Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Discussion > Honda Technical


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08 Oct 2007, 12:42 pm
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Default Life expectancy of a twincharged 2002 Civic SI..?

I might buy 2002 Civic SI near me that already has a turbo and supercharger in it. The dealer showed me it's service records. It's been properly maintained and well taken care of thus far, and also has a clean CarFax report.My only concern is the twincharge setup was put in shortly after the car was first purchased brand new, and now the car isn't far from 85k miles. I've test driven it and it seems fine now, but are it's best miles already behind it?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08 Oct 2007, 12:45 pm
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Default

It's most likely past it's prime. Only the previous owner(s) know how hard it's been driven. And such performance modifications only add to the wear.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08 Oct 2007, 12:48 pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 250
Default

You better hope they did it right because thats one complicated setup. If something goes wrong its big money to fix.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08 Oct 2007, 12:51 pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 667
Default

If it's been driven hard, you might be able to drive it off the lot.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08 Oct 2007, 12:54 pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 124
Default

Well lets see it in this forum the reason the car was sold? Probably problems. First the car is running of a supercharger mostly likely a Jackson Racing one takes over the intake manifold area, or a Vortech style which looks like a turbo but with belts attach to it. That alone is putting strain on every single part of the motor, trans and axles items. Then the car is turbo add more to this mix. And you need this to be your daily correct. So your SC boost 6pounds and your turbo 6pounds. Doing the match 12pounds but not all 12pounds get to the S/C since S/C takes over the intake part you probably see 8-10lbs of boost give or take.Now you didn't state if the car had forge items and or if it has an aftermarket clutch axles fuel injectors and ingiton system. What is the fuel management AEM or FMU? All these question are important is it tune? How long has it been boosted? Did you take to another shop to take alook at it.I personally wouldn't get it because the fact that it has S/C and Turbo at the same time not sure how good the install was and if it was good I'm pretty sure it be kinda of a famous Honda in a magazine or something. If it was either or SC or turbo it would be a great buy. And how much are they asking?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08 Oct 2007, 12:58 pm
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Default

I would take it to a high performance specialty shop because with that kind of setup it's real easy to mess it up. Have the mechanic go over it and see what he says. If I had to guess though, I would more than likely say that you may just want to move on from this one.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08 Oct 2007, 01:01 pm
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 34
Default

you want to know. If you drive like I know you will. About half way down the street and loose control racing another retard. taking out someone that was just going home. PLEASE no more unsafe cars with drivers to match
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03 May 2009, 01:54 am
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1
Default Re: Life expectancy of a twincharged 2002 Civic SI..?

hey guys, I'm looking to buy a 1986 Civic SI hatchback, do you guys have any clue what the life expectancy on one would be? The current miles on it are 250,000.

I know that my family's 91 Accord has 279,000, and is still going strong, but I'm not sure if the same applies to an older model.

Any help would be appreciated.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Honda drive train life expectancy Ike Honda 2 19 08 Oct 2006 02:32 pm
What factors go into the oil life indicator: 2006 Civic na Honda 2 36 20 Sep 2006 06:40 pm
Brake Pads / Life expectancy Greggyboy Honda 2 7 13 Jul 2005 08:52 pm
Shock/strut life for a 96 Civic Coupe slim Honda 3 12 19 Apr 2005 09:14 pm
Life expectancy of an Accord Scott Honda 2 8 27 Apr 2004 10:41 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.