Honda Car Forum

"80 Knight" <nospam@pleaseandthanks.com> wrote in message
news:c_SdnZVH__x5k5vXnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@giganews.com ...
> "Canuck57" <dave@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:KslNl.3017$qP.1212@newsfe03.iad...
>>
>> "Conscience" <nobama@göv.com> wrote in message
>> news:gu4mkh$ldf$2@news.albasani.net...
>>> On 2009-05-09 12:31:30 -0700, aemeijers <aemeijers@att.net> said:
>>>
>>>> Call a spade a spade- this is welfare for the car companies and
>>>> vote-buying from the people that would get the rebates, nothing more.
>>>> And they are doing it with MY money, as usual.
>>>
>>> No more than this needs to be said.
>>>
>>> --
>>> "The highest glory of the American Revolution was this: 'It connected in
>>> one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the
>>> principles of Christianity.' " -- John Adams
>>
>> Not much Christianity left in government. I think god wanted people to
>> repect each other. Now that the tax system is used to steal from people
>> by corrupt auto, perhaps another revolution is required? If nothing else
>> so the majority is heard and not herd.
>>
>> And shutting up about it is what the plutocrats and corrupt want. But
>> some of us will not comply, GM is a company of theives who don't pay
>> their bills but expect others too. Just a bunch of whiny welchers.
>>
>> People should write their representatives and tell them to cut the
>> bailout corruption or else.
>
> Or else what? You are going to sit on your lazy ass and keep bitching on
> a Newsgroup?

Or don't vote for them. Or better yet, recall them. For example, a senator
for say Montana benefits not at all with the auto pork, so if they support
it recall them. But it is kind of stupid for a lower paid non-union no
pension worker in Montana to pay for auto-pork. Not very good
representation if you ask me. Might want to ask the senator how much they
got paid under the table to support it.

"Vic Smith" <thismailautodeleted@comcast.net> wrote in message
newss3c05ddr7k2gtj19s2e9qdqmmcutallpl@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 9 May 2009 19:16:51 -0400, "80 Knight"
> <nospam@pleaseandthanks.com> wrote:
>
>>"Canuck57" <dave@nospam.net> wrote in message
>>news:KslNl.3017$qP.1212@newsfe03.iad...
>>>
>>> "Conscience" <nobama@göv.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gu4mkh$ldf$2@news.albasani.net...
>>>> On 2009-05-09 12:31:30 -0700, aemeijers <aemeijers@att.net> said:
>>>>
>>>>> Call a spade a spade- this is welfare for the car companies and
>>>>> vote-buying from the people that would get the rebates, nothing more.
>>>>> And they are doing it with MY money, as usual.
>>>>
>>>> No more than this needs to be said.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> "The highest glory of the American Revolution was this: 'It connected
>>>> in
>>>> one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the
>>>> principles of Christianity.' " -- John Adams
>>>
>>> Not much Christianity left in government. I think god wanted people to
>>> repect each other. Now that the tax system is used to steal from people
>>> by corrupt auto, perhaps another revolution is required? If nothing
>>> else
>>> so the majority is heard and not herd.
>>>
>>> And shutting up about it is what the plutocrats and corrupt want. But
>>> some of us will not comply, GM is a company of theives who don't pay
>>> their
>>> bills but expect others too. Just a bunch of whiny welchers.
>>>
>>> People should write their representatives and tell them to cut the
>>> bailout
>>> corruption or else.
>>
>>Or else what? You are going to sit on your lazy ass and keep bitching on
>>a
>>Newsgroup?
>>
> LOL

I see the union wankers are out. LOL. Be the end of the month your
reconing is a coming. Cold dose of reality is about to hit broad side,
couldn't happen to a better bunch.

"jim beam" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:ufudnXx3fLkcYZjXnZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t...
> johngdole@hotmail.com wrote:
>> I think this is only for >10 year old cars/trucks?
>>
>> "Under the so-called cash-for-clunkers legislation, consumers with
>> old, gas guzzlers could get $3,500 or $4,500 in government vouchers to
>> use toward the purchase of new cars that get gas mileage that exceeds
>> the old car's by four miles per gallon."
>>
>> http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/05/news...ion=2009050518
>>
>
> before y'all get too tangential, re-read the facts presented with a little
> less slant:
>
> "In the case of cars, the rebate will apply if the old vehicle achieves
> less than 18 miles per gallon and the new one is rated at a minimum of 22
> miles per gallon. The maximum rebate will apply if the fuel efficiency of
> the new car is at least 10 miles per gallon higher than the old one."
>
> <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a848c080-39d7-11de-b82d-00144feabdc0.html>
>
> my 20-year old civic auto has a 32+ mpg average over the last 4 years,
> including some ignition and temp sensor problems and a bunch of high speed
> freeway stuff. recent average mileage is in the high 35's. there aren't
> many "new" cars going to better than that in real world mileage, and
> certainly not by 10mpg.

Sounds to me like another way to pork money into corrupt auto none the less.
Can't get the pork through the front door, try the side.

Still going to cost the taxpayer plenty.

Conscience wrote:
> On 2009-05-09 12:50:38 -0700, News <News@Group.name> said:
>
>>
>>
>> Conscience wrote:
>>> On 2009-05-09 12:31:30 -0700, aemeijers <aemeijers@att.net> said:
>>>
>>>> Call a spade a spade- this is welfare for the car companies and
>>>> vote-buying from the people that would get the rebates, nothing
>>>> more. And they are doing it with MY money, as usual.
>>>
>>> No more than this needs to be said.
>>>
>>
>>
>> So go buy a beater and play the game. Get some of "your" money back.
>
> No thanks. I'll leave the unscrupulous to those who carry it well.
>
> After all, they "earned" it, right?
>

Suit yourself, Mr. Pious Sanctimonious...

On May 9, 4:42*pm, Conscience <nobama@göv.com> wrote:
> On 2009-05-09 12:50:38 -0700, News <N...@Group.name> said:
>
>
>
> > Conscience wrote:
> >> On 2009-05-09 12:31:30 -0700, aemeijers <aemeij...@att.net> said:
>
> >>> Call a spade a spade- this is welfare for the car companies and
> >>> vote-buying from the people that would get the rebates, nothing more.
> >>> And they are doing it with MY money, as usual.
>
> >> No more than this needs to be said.
>
> > So go buy a beater and play the game. *Get some of "your" money back.
>
> No thanks. *I'll leave the unscrupulous to those who carry it well.
>
> After all, they "earned" it, right?

You're going to pay for it, anyway.

Jeff

>
> --
> "The highest glory of the American Revolution was this: 'It connected
> in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the
> principles of Christianity.' " *-- John Adams

"Conscience" <nobama@göv.com> wrote in message
news:gu4pqu$pe9$1@news.albasani.net...
> On 2009-05-09 12:50:38 -0700, News <News@Group.name> said:
>
>>
>>
>> Conscience wrote:
>>> On 2009-05-09 12:31:30 -0700, aemeijers <aemeijers@att.net> said:
>>>
>>>> Call a spade a spade- this is welfare for the car companies and
>>>> vote-buying from the people that would get the rebates, nothing
>>>> more. And they are doing it with MY money, as usual.
>>>
>>> No more than this needs to be said.
>>>
>>
>>
>> So go buy a beater and play the game. Get some of "your" money
>> back.
>
> No thanks. I'll leave the unscrupulous to those who carry it well.
>
> After all, they "earned" it, right?
>

Yep. And I should have bought more house then I could afford, as so I
could get bailed out too, along with my bank.

> --
> "The highest glory of the American Revolution was this: 'It
> connected in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil
> government with the principles of Christianity.' " -- John Adams
>

CharlesTheCurmudgeon wrote:

> <johngdole@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cb292ff4-da5d-468f-b923-38ffa3e59818@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>
>>I think this is only for >10 year old cars/trucks?
>>
>>"Under the so-called cash-for-clunkers legislation, consumers with
>>old, gas guzzlers could get $3,500 or $4,500 in government vouchers to
>>use toward the purchase of new cars that get gas mileage that exceeds
>>the old car's by four miles per gallon."
>>
>>http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/05/news...ion=2009050518
>>
>
>
> This is a joke, right?
>
> In the Chicago area we hear ads on the radio for donating old cars all the
> time now, including the jack-off that sings "1-877-Kars-For-Kids" all the
> time. That, plus an emissions program that is designed to fail cars as soon
> as possible after 4 years, is designed to get people to stay in debt buying
> cars is already in place.
>
> Me, I'm driving a 14 year old Corolla. They made a change in the rules, no
> car prior to 1996 has to be emissions inspected anymore. So I continue to
> drive my old Corolla. I own it.



Heh! I got you beat as I drive Gen II Honda Civics that actually
qualify as antiques. (1981, '82 and '83). Plus they have "old school"
engineering.

But, your absolutely right... It's a whole lot cheaper in the long run
to keep your old car and drive it 'till the wheels are square!

JT

(whose back up is a '55 Studebaker Prez State sedan)

On 2009-05-10 09:45:13 -0700, Jeff <jeff.utz@gmail.com> said:

> On May 9, 4:42*pm, Conscience <nobama@göv.com> wrote:
>> On 2009-05-09 12:50:38 -0700, News <N...@Group.name> said:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Conscience wrote:
>>>> On 2009-05-09 12:31:30 -0700, aemeijers <aemeij...@att.net> said:
>>
>>>>> Call a spade a spade- this is welfare for the car companies and
>>>>> vote-buying from the people that would get the rebates, nothing more.
>>>>> And they are doing it with MY money, as usual.
>>
>>>> No more than this needs to be said.
>>
>>> So go buy a beater and play the game. *Get some of "your" money back.
>>
>> No thanks. *I'll leave the unscrupulous to those who carry it well.
>>
>> After all, they "earned" it, right?
>
> You're going to pay for it, anyway.

Ya' think? Perhaps that's why I said "unscrupulous" ?

--
"It is impossible to rightly govern without God & the Bible." -- George
Washington

Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote:
>
>But, your absolutely right... It's a whole lot cheaper in the long run
>to keep your old car and drive it 'till the wheels are square!

It's probably better for the environment as well, because the environmental
impact of manufacturing new cars and disposing of old ones is pretty high.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Scott Dorsey wrote:

> Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote:
>
>>But, your absolutely right... It's a whole lot cheaper in the long run
>>to keep your old car and drive it 'till the wheels are square!
>
>
> It's probably better for the environment as well, because the environmental
> impact of manufacturing new cars and disposing of old ones is pretty high.
> --scott


Shhhhhhhhhh------ Them thar' inviar-mentalists don't want that to git
out. Could toss cold watah on the econutz premise!

<G>

JT