Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 20 Dec 2008, 05:03 pm
CharlesTheCurmudgeon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More on the bailout


<mechanic@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:tvd3l.1211$Ve.100@edtnps82...
>
> OK... we are getting to the crux of it all....
>
>>"Millions of Americans jobless or making just $14 and hour"

>
>>Rock Hardson" <RH232@yahooo.com> wrote in message
>>news:494d4b67$0$1571$822641b3@news.adtechcompute rs.com...

>
> Apparently, it doesn't matter what the job is worth....
>
> Bend over and take it like a man starts to sound like "death to the
> infidel dogs"...
>


Just 14 dollars an hour? I now make more than that, but it took years.
And I work hard for it. I know a lot of people that work for less than
that, too.

There's no doubt in my mind that Rock Hardson is a UAW shill.

Sir Charles the Curmudgeon


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 20 Dec 2008, 10:28 pm
Mike Marlow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More on the bailout

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:54:35 -0800 (PST), Gosi cast forth these pearls of
wisdom...:


>
> A slow death is what is being processed.
> An ordered C7 is under way.
> GM is so bloody big that it needs to be closed down in parts.
> The cost of closing is being sent to the taxpayers.
> The question of interest is if any more cars people do not want need
> to be built.
> There is a huge surplus out there already.
> It will be interesting what comes after the collaps.


It's too bad you are not half as smart as you are prolific. You can
certainly spout, but man, you make an ass of yourself every time you do.

--

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 20 Dec 2008, 11:51 pm
Art
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More on the bailout

Unfortunately the bigger problem is the pension owed retired workers.
Toyota and Honda don't have similar cost issues.


"Rock Hardson" <RH232@yahooo.com> wrote in message
news:494d1c7a$1$1548$822641b3@news.adtechcomputers .com...
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews
>
> I suspect once the US auto industry gets on a level field the foriegn
> companies may be in for an ass kicking.
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 20 Dec 2008, 11:58 pm
Rock Hardson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More on the bailout


"Gosi" <gosinn@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9b5b0088-b75b-42da-9677-406a2d4d47ed@35g2000pry.googlegroups.com...
On 20 Dec, 19:45, "Rock Hardson" <RH...@yahooo.com> wrote:
> "Gosi" <gos...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:329fe1ed-1143-48de-8240-d47460d7c64f@v5g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> On 20 Dec, 17:56, Jim Higgins <gordian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 20, 8:25 am, "Rock Hardson" <RH...@yahooo.com> wrote:

>
> > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...08/12/19/AR200...

>
> > > I suspect once the US auto industry gets on a level field the foriegn
> > > companies may be in for an ass kicking.

>
> > The Detroit mindset of looking no further than about the next quarter
> > or two will not be changed by the bailout. The Japanese have accepted
> > near term losses for long term gain, an idea that is anathema to the
> > Detroit 3 (*not* the Big Three anymore). Detroit is not too big to
> > fail:

>
> > Why Detroit Is Not Too Big to
> > Failhttp://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1867847,00.html

>
> > The Remains of Detroit
> > (slideshow)http://www.time.com/time/photogaller...810098,00.html

>
> > Detroit's "best" hope is a forced bankruptcy reorganization to change
> > the outdated and lethal mindset that has done them in.

>
> A slow death is what is being processed.
> An ordered C7 is under way.
> GM is so bloody big that it needs to be closed down in parts.
> The cost of closing is being sent to the taxpayers.
> The question of interest is if any more cars people do not want need
> to be built.
> There is a huge surplus out there already.
> It will be interesting what comes after the collaps.
>
> Could it be that all your wishes will finally come true? Millions of
> Americans jobless or making just $14 and hour, more foreclosures, more
> applying for welfare being paid by your taxes, the corner hot dog stands
> and
> other stores that supported factory workers and suppliers will be out of a
> job, and from Pa. to Ohio to Michigan will be in a state of economic
> disaster that could easily trickle across that country. You would really
> love to see that. What do you care as long as the Japanese are fat and
> happy.


It is not my fault that GM has been stupid for decades and in a slow
death spiral.

And its not my fault that you were born, but what does that have to do with
it?


I am merely an observer and I have known for years what mistakes
management of GM is making.
By the same token it surely is not my doing nor wish coming true now
that GM is dead.

In looking at your post your propaganda goes back what seems like forever
for the hatred of the US industry.

GM has been making crappy products for ages and have been able to turn
the tide for years but now it is too late.
If anyone believes it has anything to do with my they give me more
credit than it is due to me.
I could have saved GM many times over a long time ago.
I still could given the means but I do not see anyone asking me to do
so.
I could not care less actually I just find it amusing to watch this
happening as predicted.
The stupid management of GM met the most stupid president in history
and got him to give out taxpayers money.
How stupid does that make the general public I am sure you have worked
out by now and that is why you are so angry.

Gosi in looking at your posts here many of your comments have no credibility
whatsover. It just amazes me how you claim you can see the future of
American industry failure, yet you can't see the repercussions. Yet you also
say it is amusing.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 21 Dec 2008, 12:01 am
Rock Hardson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More on the bailout


"CharlesTheCurmudgeon" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gijq2s$e4g$1@news.motzarella.org...
>
> <mechanic@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
> news:tvd3l.1211$Ve.100@edtnps82...
>>
>> OK... we are getting to the crux of it all....
>>
>>>"Millions of Americans jobless or making just $14 and hour"

>>
>>>Rock Hardson" <RH232@yahooo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:494d4b67$0$1571$822641b3@news.adtechcomput ers.com...

>>
>> Apparently, it doesn't matter what the job is worth....
>>
>> Bend over and take it like a man starts to sound like "death to the
>> infidel dogs"...
>>

>
> Just 14 dollars an hour? I now make more than that, but it took years.
> And I work hard for it. I know a lot of people that work for less than
> that, too.
>
> There's no doubt in my mind that Rock Hardson is a UAW shill.
>
> Sir Charles the Curmudgeon
>


Sir Charles simply can't believe or understand that a regular American with
no relationship to the union whatsover simply has an interest in the common
Joe. Selfish lives can corrupt the mind.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 21 Dec 2008, 05:39 am
Dioclese
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More on the bailout

"Rock Hardson" <RH232@yahooo.com> wrote in message
news:494d1c7a$1$1548$822641b3@news.adtechcomputers .com...
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews
>
> I suspect once the US auto industry gets on a level field the foriegn
> companies may be in for an ass kicking.
>


That's up to the fickle and uneducated/behind the times consumer's
perceptions. Ford, right now, should be educating its consumers about its
current products and future plans versus the typical consumer perceptions of
that. Consumers won't go to the dealership until that changes more.
--
Dave

2008 Focus , 5 spd no frills coupe- to date per fillup - 33 mpg low - 39 mpg
high.

How much CO footprint to remove and transport basic materials for batteries
and to manufacture the batteries for the Ford Fusion and any other hybrid?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 21 Dec 2008, 07:16 am
rantonrave@mail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More on the bailout



CharlesTheCurmudgeon wrote:
>
>"Rock Hardson" <RH232@yahooo.com> wrote in message
>news:494d1c7a$1$1548$822641b3@news.adtechcomputer s.com...
>>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews
>>
>>I suspect once the US auto industry gets on a level field the foriegn
>>companies may be in for an ass kicking.

>
>
>Sorry, you are WRONG. US auto makers do not encourage the culture of
>quality that the Japanese auto makers embraced about 50 years ago. Until
>the American automakers demonstrate they are truly commited to quality and
>not just dependent on whether the head of the company is commited to quality
>or not, there's not only going to not be a level playing field, there's not
>gong to be any play.
>

The Japanese may have embraced it 50 years ago, but they continued to
have horrible quality
(can you say 'Toyopet'?) for another 25 years. It's also a myth that
Japanese car makers universally have better quality because when
Toyota, Honda, and Subaru are excluded, their quality falls to being
only par with ours.

What's been more important to Japanese success is the culture of
engineers versus our culture of business majors. This is especially
true because development of new products never makes sense from a
financial standpoint. Business majors understand this, but engineers
fortunately don't.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 21 Dec 2008, 07:18 am
rantonrave@mail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More on the bailout



Mike Hunter wrote:
>
>Can we assume that apparently you have not seen the numerous reports that
>show many of the domestic are BEATING some of the imports in customer
>quality surveys? Have you seen the CAFE lists that show many domestics
>are as good or better than imports, of the same size, when it comes to fuel
>economy and some domestic, with V6 engines, are doing nearly as good as
>imports with only 4cy engines?
>

So why can't we honestly say all of them beat the foreign brands, as
was once could?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 21 Dec 2008, 11:09 am
Jim Higgins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More on the bailout

On Dec 21, 4:16*am, "rantonr...@mail.com" <rantonr...@mail.com> wrote:
> CharlesTheCurmudgeon wrote:
>
> >"Rock Hardson" <RH...@yahooo.com> wrote in message
> >news:494d1c7a$1$1548$822641b3@news.adtechcomputer s.com...
> >>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...08/12/19/AR200....

>
> >>I suspect once the US auto industry gets on a level field the foriegn
> >>companies may be in for an ass kicking.

>
> >Sorry, you are WRONG. *US auto makers do not encourage the culture of
> >quality that the Japanese auto makers embraced about 50 years ago. *Until
> >the American automakers demonstrate they are truly commited to quality and
> >not just dependent on whether the head of the company is commited to quality
> >or not, *there's not only going to not be a level playing field, there's not
> >gong to be any play.

>
> The Japanese may have embraced it 50 years ago, but they continued to
> have horrible quality
> (can you say 'Toyopet'?) for another 25 years. *It's also a myth that
> Japanese car makers universally have better quality because when
> Toyota, Honda, and Subaru are excluded, their quality falls to being
> only par with ours.
>
> What's been more important to Japanese success is the culture of
> engineers versus our culture of business majors. *This is especially
> true because development of new products never makes sense from a
> financial standpoint. *Business majors understand this, but engineers
> fortunately don't.



"...when Toyota, Honda, and Subaru are excluded, their quality falls
to being
only par with ours."

By your own admission Toyota and Honda's quality is superior to
Detroit's. Congratulations on finally coming around to that
conclusion, there is hope for you yet :-)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 21 Dec 2008, 11:42 am
Gordon McGrew
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More on the bailout

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:26:25 -0500, "Mike Hunter"
<mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote:

>Can we assume that apparently you have not seen the numerous reports that
>show many of the domestic are BEATING some of the imports in customer
>quality surveys?


I have seen the Consumer Reports Survey which shows that Toyota and
Honda are far more reliable than anything made by the "Big Three".
(Hard to call them the Big Three when Chrysler ranks fifth in sales.)

> Have you seen the CAFE lists that show many domestics
>are as good or better than imports, of the same size, when it comes to fuel
>economy and some domestic, with V6 engines, are doing nearly as good as
>imports with only 4cy engines?


That's nice, if questionably true. But GM and Ford would already be
in liquidation if it had to rely on those cars. The only thing that
has kept them floating over the last decade has been the 10-12 mpg
dinosaurs that are on the brink of extinction.

GM just put a hold on the factory which was supposed to build the
vaporware Volt. What does that say?





>
>
>"CharlesTheCurmudgeon" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:gij6p4$srt$1@news.motzarella.org...
>>
>> "Rock Hardson" <RH232@yahooo.com> wrote in message
>> news:494d1c7a$1$1548$822641b3@news.adtechcomputers .com...
>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews
>>>
>>> I suspect once the US auto industry gets on a level field the foriegn
>>> companies may be in for an ass kicking.
>>>

>>
>> Sorry, you are WRONG. US auto makers do not encourage the culture of
>> quality that the Japanese auto makers embraced about 50 years ago. Until
>> the American automakers demonstrate they are truly commited to quality and
>> not just dependent on whether the head of the company is commited to
>> quality or not, there's not only going to not be a level playing field,
>> there's not gong to be any play.
>>
>> And since you are obviously a UAW shill, you go plonk in the night.
>>
>> Sir Charles the Curmudgeon
>> Friends don't let friends vote Democrat.
>>

>

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Consumers Reports Seeks Bailout Comments4u Honda 3 67 22 Jan 2009 10:16 pm
The Big Three Auto Bailout from the LA Auto Show skylight Honda Videos 0 25 Nov 2008 10:00 pm
GM, Ford and Chrysler say they need a $40 billion bailout...? Natalia Kovalevskaya Honda Technical 2 26 Aug 2008 04:47 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.