Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
To which I ask, if the purchaser was warranted, don't you think that it
would be stated in the warranty manual? You are free to believe whatever you wish, but the manufacture warrants the vehicle to it dealer(s,) not the owners as I have tried to explain numerous times. LOL "Dillon Pyron" <invaliddmpyron@austin.rr.com> wrote in message news:b45nm4pg7b89a0vtig77nsj571vqd2tjnu@4ax.com... > Thus spake Jeff <jeff.utz@gmail.com> : > >>On Jan 11, 4:44 pm, "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote: >>> I never said that, did you miss the "Normally" that someone quoted from >>> the >>> warranty manual? >>> >>> The manufacture warrants the vehicle to it dealer(s.) >> >>Then why does the warranties talk about transferring the warranty to >>new owners of the car or truck? Why would there be any need to >>transfer the warranty? And, if you were correct, wouldn't the wording >>of the warranties reflect that the warranty is to the dealers? >> >>And why does the Chrysler warranty have this language? "You are >>covered by the Basic Limited Warranty if >>you are a purchaser for use of the vehicle." >> >>And where does it say that the dealer is warranted here? >> >>"In the United States (We Include U.S. >>Possessions and Territories as Part of >>the United States for Warranty Purposes): >>Warranty service must be done by an authorized >>Chrysler, Dodge or Jeep dealer. We strongly >>recommend that you take your vehicle to your >>Selling Dealer. They know you and your vehicle >>best, and are most concerned that you get >>prompt and high quality service. If you move >>within the United States, warranty service may >>be requested from any authorized Chrysler, >>Dodge or Jeep dealer." >> >>And GM says that if you buy a GM car, *you* get a 100,000 mi >>powertrain warranty. Not your dealer. >> >>Get a clue, if you can old man. > > Head, meet wall. Wall, this is head. > >> >>Jeff >> >>> In a situation where >>> ones selling dealer has closed down or one has moved a great distance, >>> (most >>> warranty agreements mention 50 miles) the manufacture will have it towed >>> to >>> their nearest dealership, same as if one is traveling. >>> >>> That dealer, unlike your dealer, will most likely not do the work before >>> receiving prior authorization to do so, till he knows he will be >>> reimbursed. >>> >>> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <el...@nastydesigns.com> wrote in >>> messagenews:elmop-A6A2D3.13052110012009@mara100-84.onlink.net... >>> >>> > In article <x5qdnfkWd43HS_XUnZ2dnUVZ_snin...@ptd.net>, >>> > "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote: >>> >>> >> When the reference was made to calling the manufacturer about a >>> >> warranty >>> >> PROBLEM, what I said was, if you do they will tell you to contact >>> >> your >>> >> SELLING dealer because DISPUTED warranty claims MUST go to the >>> >> selling >>> >> dealer and that is a fact, whether you choose to believe it or not. >>> >>> > So let me get this straight: you're saying that if I buy a car in >>> > Maine >>> > and three months later move to California, and three months after that >>> > have a warranty problem that the servicing dealer in California >>> > disputes, and I want to run it up the chain to the manufacturer's >>> > representative... >>> >>> > ....that I have to trek the car back to my SELLING dealer back in >>> > MAINE? > -- > - dillon I am not invalid > > When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams come true. > Unless it's really a meteorite hurtling to the Earth which > will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much hosed no > matter what you wish for. Unless it's death by meteor. > > |
|
|||
|
Stop acting like a jerk (I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I say
you are only *acting* like a jerk) and giving people information that YOU BELIEVE to be true. The auto warranty IS between the car makers and their DEALER(S!) If I am incorrect, please provide real evidence. ![]() "Jeff" <jeff.utz@gmail.com> wrote in message news:5b486cf1-42ba-4ee1-b651-2d034e5c0705@v42g2000yqv.googlegroups.com... On Jan 11, 4:44 pm, "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote: > I never said that, did you miss the "Normally" that someone quoted from > the > warranty manual? > > The manufacture warrants the vehicle to it dealer(s.) In a situation where > ones selling dealer has closed down or one has moved a great distance, > (most > warranty agreements mention 50 miles) the manufacture will have it towed > to > their nearest dealership, same as if one is traveling. > > That dealer, unlike your dealer, will most likely not do the work before > receiving prior authorization to do so, till he knows he will be > reimbursed. > > "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <el...@nastydesigns.com> wrote in > messagenews:elmop-A6A2D3.13052110012009@mara100-84.onlink.net... > > > In article <x5qdnfkWd43HS_XUnZ2dnUVZ_snin...@ptd.net>, > > "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote: > > >> When the reference was made to calling the manufacturer about a > >> warranty > >> PROBLEM, what I said was, if you do they will tell you to contact your > >> SELLING dealer because DISPUTED warranty claims MUST go to the selling > >> dealer and that is a fact, whether you choose to believe it or not. > > > So let me get this straight: you're saying that if I buy a car in Maine > > and three months later move to California, and three months after that > > have a warranty problem that the servicing dealer in California > > disputes, and I want to run it up the chain to the manufacturer's > > representative... > > > ....that I have to trek the car back to my SELLING dealer back in MAINE? If the warranty is to the dealer, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act requires this fact to be stated in the warranty documents. It isn't. Stop acting like a jerk (I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I sat that you are only *acting* like a jerk) and giving people information that you make that is completely false. The auto warranties are between the car makers and the buyers. If I am incorrect, please provide real evidence. Jeff |
|
|||
|
And where does it say that the OWNER is warranted here?
"In the United States (We Include U.S. Possessions and Territories as Part of the United States for Warranty Purposes): Warranty service MUST be done by an AUTHORIZED CHRYSLER, DODGE or JEEP DEALER. We strongly RECOMMEND that you take your vehicle to your SELLING DEALER. They know you and your vehicle best, and are most concerned that you get prompt and high quality service. If you MOVE within the United States, warranty service may be requested from any authorized Chrysler, Dodge or Jeep dealer." "Jeff" <jeff.utz@gmail.com> wrote in message news:f5196638-5084-426b-85f5-4fdb0ee8e51e@33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... On Jan 11, 4:44 pm, "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote: > I never said that, did you miss the "Normally" that someone quoted from > the > warranty manual? > > The manufacture warrants the vehicle to it dealer(s.) Then why does the warranties talk about transferring the warranty to new owners of the car or truck? Why would there be any need to transfer the warranty? And, if you were correct, wouldn't the wording of the warranties reflect that the warranty is to the dealers? And why does the Chrysler warranty have this language? "You are covered by the Basic Limited Warranty if you are a purchaser for use of the vehicle." And where does it say that the dealer is warranted here? "In the United States (We Include U.S. Possessions and Territories as Part of the United States for Warranty Purposes): Warranty service must be done by an authorized Chrysler, Dodge or Jeep dealer. We strongly recommend that you take your vehicle to your Selling Dealer. They know you and your vehicle best, and are most concerned that you get prompt and high quality service. If you move within the United States, warranty service may be requested from any authorized Chrysler, Dodge or Jeep dealer." If the selling dealer is warranted, don't you think that that would be stated in the warranty manual? And GM says that if you buy a GM car, *you* get a 100,000 mi powertrain warranty. Not your dealer. Get a clue, if you can old man. Jeff > In a situation where > ones selling dealer has closed down or one has moved a great distance, > (most > warranty agreements mention 50 miles) the manufacture will have it towed > to > their nearest dealership, same as if one is traveling. > > That dealer, unlike your dealer, will most likely not do the work before > receiving prior authorization to do so, till he knows he will be > reimbursed. > > "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <el...@nastydesigns.com> wrote in > messagenews:elmop-A6A2D3.13052110012009@mara100-84.onlink.net... > > > In article <x5qdnfkWd43HS_XUnZ2dnUVZ_snin...@ptd.net>, > > "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote: > > >> When the reference was made to calling the manufacturer about a > >> warranty > >> PROBLEM, what I said was, if you do they will tell you to contact your > >> SELLING dealer because DISPUTED warranty claims MUST go to the selling > >> dealer and that is a fact, whether you choose to believe it or not. > > > So let me get this straight: you're saying that if I buy a car in Maine > > and three months later move to California, and three months after that > > have a warranty problem that the servicing dealer in California > > disputes, and I want to run it up the chain to the manufacturer's > > representative... > > > ....that I have to trek the car back to my SELLING dealer back in MAINE? |
|
|||
|
"Dillon Pyron" <invaliddmpyron@austin.rr.com> wrote in message news:jv4nm41kkkoc5o8ll9eb36go3j8aijrubu@4ax.com... > Thus spake "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> : > >>So what's your point? Did you think you could take it to a Toyota dealer >> ![]() > > Jesus ****ing Christ!!! Did you not see the part where it says I can > take it to ANY dealer and not the one I bought it from?? > > And please don't top post. Top posting is for idiots that don't know > how to actually work in Usenet. > Or self-righteous arseholes like Mike Hunter who think that because he has the gold, he can make the rules. Sir Charles the Curmudgeon |
|
|||
|
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote in message news:8oqdnazkiZ21OvbUnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@ptd.net... > To which I ask, if the purchaser was warranted, don't you think that > it would be stated in the warranty manual? > > You are free to believe whatever you wish, but the manufacture > warrants the vehicle to it dealer(s,) not the owners as I have tried > to explain numerous times. > LOL What you are saying makes no sense Mike. The warranty is to the vehicle purchaser. The dealer acts as the agent for the manufacturer. I can take my broken Ford, that is under warranty, to any Ford dealer for repairs. They will do the work that Ford allows and then get reimbursed by Ford. The warranty is granted by the manufacturer to the purchaser of the vehicle and is transferable to subsequent purchasers. Ed |
|
|||
|
In article <i5GdnWoZFKjONPbUnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@ptd.net>,
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote: > And where does it say that the OWNER is warranted here? > > "In the United States (We Include U.S. > Possessions and Territories as Part of > the United States for Warranty Purposes): > Warranty service MUST be done by an AUTHORIZED > CHRYSLER, DODGE or JEEP DEALER. We strongly > RECOMMEND that you take your vehicle to your > SELLING DEALER. They know you and your vehicle > best, and are most concerned that you get > prompt and high quality service. If you MOVE > within the United States, warranty service may > be requested from any authorized Chrysler, > Dodge or Jeep dealer." Where does it say the SELLING DEALER is the other party in the warranty? Let's see....nowhere. However, it does say that service must be done by an authorized dealer...and of course, Chrysler can authorize anyone they want. Notice that it says NOTHING about "you must take it to your SELLING DEALER." They only "recommend" that. They don't MANDATE or REQUIRE it. Gee, My Cunter. Maybe you can't read. It also says "warranty service may be requested from any authorized dealer". ANY authorized dealer. So now you have established that you were full of shit about the car being taken to the SELLING dealer. Now let's talk about who is protected by the warranty: what is all this "you may take it..." stuff? WHO may take it? To WHOM is Chrysler talking? <gasp!> THE OWNER. The guy who bought the car. Chrysler is NOT talking to the dealer, because the warranty is not between Chrysler and any dealer. The warranty is between Chrysler and the OWNER. And Chrysler makes it easy on themselves, and the owner, by not forcing the owner to take the car back to the Chrysler factory. Chrysler authorizes third parties to act on BEHALF of Chrysler. Get that? On BEHALF of Chrysler. When performing warranty work, the authorized service entity IS, for all intents and purposes, CHRYSLER. The owner of the car remains the owner of the car, and the owner of the car is requesting warranty service from the MANUFACTURER. The warranty is offered from the MANUFACTURER to the owner. Period. That the MANUFACTURER may CHOOSE to authorize others to act in its BEHALF changes NOTHING about the fact that the warranty is BETWEEN THE MANUFACTURER AND THE OWNER. |
|
|||
|
In article <meCdnUGK5pyrNfbUnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@ptd.net>,
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote: > Stop acting like a jerk (I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I say > you are only *acting* like a jerk) and giving people information that YOU > BELIEVE to be true. You mean, just like you're giving people information that YOU BELIEVE to be true? Just because YOU believe it, doesn't mean anything. The rest of us can read and have had experience in these matters, and know that what you BELIEVE is factually WRONG. You may BELIEVE that the Holocaust didn't exist, but you would be factually WRONG. |
|
|||
|
As I said I could not care less what someone in a NG chooses to believe but
if you actually READ your new car Limited Warranty you will see it said; Your (manufacturer) and (Brand) dealer(s) warrants etc. If the warranty was between the buyer and the manufacturer it would be a contract, just like the agreements between the buyer and his finance source, it is a contract with the dealers Call your attorney and ask him if ONE party of a contract can change ANY part of a contract. If you actually READ your new car Limited Warranty, under "Limitations and Disclaimers" you will see it said "With the exception of implied warranty under federal and state laws (manufacturer) and (Brand) dealer(s) reserves the right to make changes and or additions to vehicles built and sold by them at any time etc. You have a contract with your insurance company to repairer you damaged car. If the insurance company wants to use less than new parts to repair it, you can demand NEW parts on YOUR new car but a car warranty says otherwise. The reason being the warranty is NOT a contract with you, it is with the dealer(s.) "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message news:elmop-D616D2.16374112012009@mara100-84.onlink.net... > In article <meCdnUGK5pyrNfbUnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@ptd.net>, > "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote: > >> Stop acting like a jerk (I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I >> say >> you are only *acting* like a jerk) and giving people information that YOU >> BELIEVE to be true. > > You mean, just like you're giving people information that YOU BELIEVE to > be true? > > Just because YOU believe it, doesn't mean anything. The rest of us can > read and have had experience in these matters, and know that what you > BELIEVE is factually WRONG. > > You may BELIEVE that the Holocaust didn't exist, but you would be > factually WRONG. |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:47:28 -0500, "C. E. White"
<cewhite3@removemindspring.com> wrote: > >"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote in message >news:8oqdnazkiZ21OvbUnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@ptd.net.. . >> To which I ask, if the purchaser was warranted, don't you think that >> it would be stated in the warranty manual? >> >> You are free to believe whatever you wish, but the manufacture >> warrants the vehicle to it dealer(s,) not the owners as I have tried >> to explain numerous times. >> LOL > >What you are saying makes no sense Mike. The warranty is to the >vehicle purchaser. The dealer acts as the agent for the manufacturer. >I can take my broken Ford, that is under warranty, to any Ford dealer >for repairs. They will do the work that Ford allows and then get >reimbursed by Ford. The warranty is granted by the manufacturer to the >purchaser of the vehicle and is transferable to subsequent purchasers. > >Ed We should just let this thread die Ed. Mike either really enjoys seeing people respond to what he says or he's so stupid that the facts will never make an impression on him. I think it boosts his ego to see his name in print and he will never acknowledge the facts if it keeps the thread going. Jack j |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:28:04 GMT, Retired VIP
<jackj.extradots.180@windstream.net> wrote: > >We should just let this thread die Ed. Mike either really enjoys >seeing people respond to what he says or he's so stupid that the facts >will never make an impression on him. I think it boosts his ego to >see his name in print and he will never acknowledge the facts if it >keeps the thread going. > >Jack j Agreed. Either he's an idiot and he's incapable of understanding or he's intentionally acting like one for his own distorted amusement. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 0-60 time and 1/2 mile time of 2007 civic lx coupe? | gilly | Honda Technical | 3 | 18 Sep 2007 01:18 pm |
| daughter has a 1990 honda accord, heater fan will work one time and then next time she | bejabbers2003 | Honda Technical | 5 | 13 Sep 2007 05:44 pm |
| My factory alarm on my 92 vigor has gotten on my nerves for time last time!? | justice82303 | Acura Technical | 1 | 15 Aug 2007 07:25 pm |
| Honda Accord 98 Doesn't Start Morning time to time | Homer | Honda 3 | 7 | 13 Oct 2006 08:35 am |
| Toyota Mfg Chief Admits to More Problem in US Assembly Plants | John Horner | Honda 2 | 1 | 28 May 2004 09:11 am |