Honda Car Forum | |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello,
I was reading somewhere, which I cannot remember off hand that the 2008 Accord V6 coupe with the 6 spd MT will do 0-60 in 5.5 seconds. I was more so considering the Accord V6 automatic 5 spd for the next car, than the manual. So I was wondering what the 0-60 difference would be? No one seems to mention it anywhere, but I would estimate about 5.8 or so. I have the EX-L 4 cyl with the 5 spd auto and I believe it does 0-60 in about 6.8 seconds. To put this into perspective, the 2008 Accord V6 6spd MT does 0-60 in 5.5 seconds. The Aston Martin DBS V12 (used in 007 Casino Royale movie) with 500 hp does 0-60 in 4.3 seconds. You sacrifice 1.2 seconds and save around $170,000.00. I think I'll go with the Accord, unless I win the lottery! I know all this means nothing to most people, but I'm still into performance, although when it all comes down to car buying I still want comfort and convienience and for a bargain. So I'm not going to and get a Pontiac G8 because its RWD and its a V8, and I don't want to spend more than 31k tops. Thanks, Al |
|
|||
|
Edmunds did an EX/V6 (automatic standard), and it clocked in 7.1sec
0-60MPH. Looks like a Camry will perform better at 6.5sec. So Honda's computer-limiting throttle up to 20MPH had something to do with it. However, Toyota's new U-series automatics had problems skipping gears. Maybe that's solved now, but the U-series seem to be problematic. That said, I hope Honda doesn't extend their TSBs again past 2003 with their automatics. "At the test track, the new Accord hit 60 mph in 7.1 seconds and ran the quarter-mile in 15.5 seconds at 91.8 mph. That's a solid improvement over the Accord in our last V6 Family Sedan Comparison Test, but it's still well behind the Camry V6 that whomped to 60 in just 6.5 seconds and scorched the quarter in 14.6 seconds at 97.3 mph." http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=122825 On Nov 9, 7:53*am, "alfred" <tombo...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I was reading somewhere, which I cannot remember off hand that the 2008 > Accord V6 coupe with the 6 spd MT will do 0-60 in 5.5 seconds. I was moreso > considering the Accord V6 automatic 5 spd for the next car, than the manual. > So I was wondering what the 0-60 difference would be? No one seems to > mention it anywhere, but I would estimate about 5.8 or so. I have the EX-L 4 > cyl with the 5 spd auto and I believe it does 0-60 in about 6.8 seconds. > > To put this into perspective, the 2008 Accord V6 6spd MT does 0-60 in 5.5 > seconds. The Aston Martin DBS V12 (used in 007 Casino Royale movie) with 500 > hp does 0-60 in 4.3 seconds. You sacrifice 1.2 seconds and save around > $170,000.00. I think I'll go with the Accord, unless I win the lottery! > > I know all this means nothing to most people, but I'm still into > performance, although when it all comes down to car buying I still want > comfort and convienience and for a bargain. So I'm not going to and get a > Pontiac G8 because its RWD and its a V8, and I don't want to spend more than > 31k tops. > > Thanks, > > Al |
|
|||
|
johngdole@hotmail.com wrote:
> Toyota's new U-series automatics had problems skipping gears. > Maybe that's solved now, but the U-series seem to be problematic. Take it for what it's worth, but Consumer Reports recently removed the current Camry V6 from their "not recommended" list. But I don't remember if they added it to their "recommended" list or if it is still in the middle. So perhaps Toyota got it right with the '08 or '09. > That > said, I hope Honda doesn't extend their TSBs again past 2003 with > their automatics. Haven't heard anything about 2005 and newer automatics having problems, so perhaps Honda has fixed that for good as well. |
|
|||
|
"Eternal Searcher" <eternalsearcher@yahoo.ca.invalid> wrote in message news:gf7aq3$8l9$1@registered.motzarella.org... > johngdole@hotmail.com wrote: > >> Toyota's new U-series automatics had problems skipping gears. >> Maybe that's solved now, but the U-series seem to be problematic. > > Take it for what it's worth, but Consumer Reports recently removed the > current Camry V6 from their "not recommended" list. But I don't remember > if > they added it to their "recommended" list or if it is still in the middle. > So perhaps Toyota got it right with the '08 or '09. > > >> That >> said, I hope Honda doesn't extend their TSBs again past 2003 with >> their automatics. > > Haven't heard anything about 2005 and newer automatics having problems, so > perhaps Honda has fixed that for good as well. Okay so Accord V6 auto is 7.1 seconds, maybe I mis calculated mine. It could be around 7.6 0-60, but still the Accord coupe V6 manual is supposed to do 0-60 in 5.5 sec, so thats worth looking at. I'm just not crazy about driving a manual in traffic, but I drive almost all highway to work and on an average work day drive no more than 14 mi round trip. So its not like I am going to be in bad and high traffic everyday. I wish honda accord would come out with a sequential sport shifter or paddles. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Honda Accord coupe differences between 2009 and 2008? | salvag@sbcglobal.net | Honda Technical | 3 | 09 Aug 2008 01:01 am |
| 2008' Accord 2.4L Performance Upgrades? | Bentracer and Bentrider | Honda 2 | 13 | 20 Feb 2008 11:14 pm |
| Differences between a 2006, 2007, and 2008 Honda Fit Sport? | Claus | Honda Technical | 1 | 08 Feb 2008 03:01 pm |
| Differences between a 2007 and 2008 Lincoln MKZ? | tyler p | Honda Technical | 1 | 25 Oct 2007 04:18 pm |
| All-New 2008 Honda Accord Emphasizes Technology, Safety and Performance Within an Expressive and Spa | skylight | Honda Accord | 0 | 21 Aug 2007 02:52 pm |