Honda Car Forum

On Feb 2, 5:10*pm, "Howard Lester" <heyles...@dakotacom.net> wrote:
> "Avalon1178" * wrote
>
> >> Why the resistance to following it?
> > Who said I'm not gonna follow it? *Can't you read my original
>
> question? *A simple "yes" or "no" is all I'm looking for. *Geez, did I
> just offend your Honda religion or something?
>
> Your original post included wondering a) what happens if the "minder"
> malfunctions, and b) what happens if the dealer forgets to reset it. (It was
> to those that I responded.) Those are not "yes or no" questions. So in the
> future, be clear with your communication, and we'll respond accordingly.
> There are a lot of bright, knowledgeable people here who really do go out of
> their way to help... and respond accordingly. Seriously, I hope you enjoy
> your new car.
>
> This has been a very entertaining thread; thank you all!

Dude, are you and Elmo eating the same food for dinner? Here's my
original question from the very first post of this thread:

"Now with all the new
features in the 2008 model like maintenance reminders etc, and the
absence of a schedule maintenance in the owner's manual, is there no
point to following your standard 5000 miles scheduled maintenance to,
say, get your oil change etc or your typical 10,000-interval mile
service to a shop (like tire rotation, brake fluid check, etc)? "

Maybe you should stick to reading those astronomy books and learning
about hummingbird behaviors, or try using your own brain for a chance
before you suggest others to do the same.

>
> have you noticed how people here don't like answering dumb questions?
> you want to pay me, i'll give you any answer you want. *if you don't
> want to pay me, you got to interest me - and bleating about what you're
> getting for free just doesn't do that.- Hide quoted text -
>

Thanks but I finally got my answer. Unfortunately it took 14+ threads
to sift through. Some people here seriously have issues if one
comment that may sound "bad" is made to their Honda gods.

Avalon1178 wrote:
> On Feb 2, 5:10�pm, "Howard Lester" <heyles...@dakotacom.net> wrote:
>> "Avalon1178" � wrote
>>
>>>> Why the resistance to following it?
>>> Who said I'm not gonna follow it? �Can't you read my original
>> question? �A simple "yes" or "no" is all I'm looking for. �Geez, did I
>> just offend your Honda religion or something?
>>
>> Your original post included wondering a) what happens if the "minder"
>> malfunctions, and b) what happens if the dealer forgets to reset it. (It was
>> to those that I responded.) Those are not "yes or no" questions. So in the
>> future, be clear with your communication, and we'll respond accordingly.
>> There are a lot of bright, knowledgeable people here who really do go out of
>> their way to help... and respond accordingly. Seriously, I hope you enjoy
>> your new car.
>>
>> This has been a very entertaining thread; thank you all!
>
> Dude, are you and Elmo eating the same food for dinner? Here's my
> original question from the very first post of this thread:
>
> "Now with all the new
> features in the 2008 model like maintenance reminders etc, and the
> absence of a schedule maintenance in the owner's manual, is there no
> point to following your standard 5000 miles scheduled maintenance to,
> say, get your oil change etc or your typical 10,000-interval mile
> service to a shop (like tire rotation, brake fluid check, etc)? "
>
> Maybe you should stick to reading those astronomy books and learning
> about hummingbird behaviors, or try using your own brain for a chance
> before you suggest others to do the same.
>

lets get this straight - you show up out of the blue, you ask badly
constructed and poorly considered questions, then get all pissed because
the people you're asking really can't be bothered with your shit, but
it's all their fault??? dude, knowing how to read the owners manual is
the least of your problems.

> lets get this straight - you show up out of the blue, you ask badly
> constructed and poorly considered questions, then get all pissed because
> the people you're asking really can't be bothered with your shit, but
> it's all their fault??? *dude, knowing how to read the owners manual is
> the least of your problems.- Hide quoted text -
>

Okay, I guess we can put you in the same horse stable as Elmo and
Howard. I think someone needs to replace the hay you guys have been
eating.

Read my original question again. If you people don't want to be
bothered with my question, then don't respond at all, instead of
saying some smartass response like I don't know what I'm talking
about. Its a simple question given the fact that I drove an older
model before purchasing a new one. And if you can't follow this
"badly constructed and poorly considered question", then I guess
you're just as stupid for not carefully reading it before posting your
response. This is a usenet group, not grammar school.

Avalon1178 wrote:
>> lets get this straight - you show up out of the blue, you ask badly
>> constructed and poorly considered questions, then get all pissed because
>> the people you're asking really can't be bothered with your shit, but
>> it's all their fault??? �dude, knowing how to read the owners manual is
>> the least of your problems.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>
> Okay, I guess we can put you in the same horse stable as Elmo and
> Howard. I think someone needs to replace the hay you guys have been
> eating.
>
> Read my original question again. If you people don't want to be
> bothered with my question, then don't respond at all, instead of
> saying some smartass response like I don't know what I'm talking
> about. Its a simple question given the fact that I drove an older
> model before purchasing a new one. And if you can't follow this
> "badly constructed and poorly considered question", then I guess
> you're just as stupid for not carefully reading it before posting your
> response. This is a usenet group, not grammar school.


let's see - you've argued with not one, not two, but three people here.
statistically, what is the likely common denominator in this equation?

> let's see - you've argued with not one, not two, but three people here.
> * statistically, what is the likely common denominator in this equation?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Three stupid people eating hay in a horse stable

On Feb 2, 10:35*pm, rcpesi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > let's see - you've argued with not one, not two, but three people here.
> > * statistically, what is the likely common denominator in this equation?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Three stupid people eating hay in a horse stable

Now who the heck are you? If I were you I wouldn't get involved....

> let's see - you've argued with not one, not two, but three people here.
> statistically, what is the likely common denominator in this equation?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Hahaha, someone posted a response to this question that is worthy of
repeating, but I think he/she knows better about getting involved
since he/she deleted their post.

On Feb 2, 10:54*pm, Avalon <Avalon1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > let's see - you've argued with not one, not two, but three people here.
> > * statistically, what is the likely common denominator in this equation?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Hahaha, someone posted a response to this question that is worthy of
> repeating, but I think he/she knows better about getting involved
> since he/she deleted their post.

Eh! What the heck, I'll say what his/her response was:

Q: let's see - you've argued with not one, not two, but three people
here.
> > statistically, what is the likely common denominator in this equation?

A: Three stupid people eating hay in a horse stable

Hahahaha!

"jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote

> Avalon1178 wrote:
>>> lets get this straight - you show up out of the blue, you ask badly
>>> constructed and poorly considered questions, then get all pissed because
>>> the people you're asking really can't be bothered with your shit, but
>>> it's all their fault??? �dude, knowing how to read the owners manual is
>>> the least of your problems.- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>
>> Okay, I guess we can put you in the same horse stable as Elmo and
>> Howard. I think someone needs to replace the hay you guys have been
>> eating.
>>
>> Read my original question again. If you people don't want to be
>> bothered with my question, then don't respond at all, instead of
>> saying some smartass response like I don't know what I'm talking
>> about. Its a simple question given the fact that I drove an older
>> model before purchasing a new one. And if you can't follow this
>> "badly constructed and poorly considered question", then I guess
>> you're just as stupid for not carefully reading it before posting your
>> response. This is a usenet group, not grammar school.
>
>
> let's see - you've argued with not one, not two, but three people here.
> statistically, what is the likely common denominator in this equation?

That he met three assholes in a row.

Polfus