Honda Car Forum | |
|
|||
|
On 01 May 2007 11:23:14 GMT, jamie <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote:
>Hello > >Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and >lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE? > >In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models. > >Thank you Of the series listed, the LX has the least "stuff". The SE usually seems to show up in the last year of a body style and is equipped very closely to an EX model. The EX is the higest trimmed model. |
|
|||
|
Bob <anyhow@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
news:2jge33hgrsra9lo6r77l4upgj3amrflc6i@4ax.com: > On 01 May 2007 11:23:14 GMT, jamie <me2@privacy.net.invalid> > wrote: > >>Hello >> >>Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is >>second and lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE? >> >>In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models. >> >>Thank you > > Of the series listed, the LX has the least "stuff". The SE > usually seems to show up in the last year of a body style and > is equipped very closely to an EX model. The EX is the higest > trimmed model. Thank you So Very much! :-)) |
|
|||
|
jamie <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2
@authen.puce.readfreenews.net: > Hello > > Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and > lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE? > > In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models. > > Thank you Which model? For Accords, it's LX SE EX generally For CR-V's LX EX SE |
|
|||
|
Nobody wrote:
> jamie <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2 > @authen.puce.readfreenews.net: > >> Hello >> >> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and >> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE? >> >> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models. >> >> Thank you > > Which model? > > For Accords, it's LX SE EX generally > > For CR-V's LX EX SE For Accords, it depends on the model year. On the 1991 and 1993 Accords, SE was the top model. |
|
|||
|
In article <Xns992F11947603AIDTOKENnobodyIDTOKEN@66.250.146.1 28>,
nobody@nowhere.com says... > jamie <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2 > @authen.puce.readfreenews.net: > > > Hello > > > > Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and > > lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE? > > > > In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models. > > > > Thank you > > Which model? > > For Accords, it's LX SE EX generally Don't forget the "VP" (Value Package) which replaced the true low end model, the DX. --Gene |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 13 May 2007 08:19:39 -0400, High Tech Misfit <me@privacy.net>
wrote: >Nobody wrote: > >> jamie <me2@privacy.net.invalid> wrote in news:46372322$0$14954$892e7fe2 >> @authen.puce.readfreenews.net: >> >>> Hello >>> >>> Can someone kindly tell me which is the better, which is second and >>> lastly which has least options; LX EX & SE? >>> >>> In other words... what's the difference in the 3 models. >>> >>> Thank you >> >> Which model? >> >> For Accords, it's LX SE EX generally >> >> For CR-V's LX EX SE > >For Accords, it depends on the model year. On the 1991 and 1993 Accords, SE >was the top model. Same for the 1989 model Accord. The SE-i had leather seats, Bose radio and some other goodies. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|