Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi
I just bought the 2007 civic LX A/T. I am thinking of the extended warranty for 7years/130000 km for 1000$ Canadian. What do you guys think , are people taking it. Basic warranty is 3 year for bumper to bumper and 5 years for powertrain and tranny. I have had two Hondas before 93 Civic and 92 Accord and never had a problem before 8 years, but I hear quality is not what it used to be, excellent compared to everybody else but not the same comparted to older gen Hondas. I am planning to keep this car for at least 8 years I appreciate the help. I believe you have a few months to exercise the extended warranty for the same price Tx again |
|
|||
|
On Mar 29, 8:54 am, "cosza" <c...@cae.ca> wrote:
> Hi > I just bought the 2007 civic LX A/T. I am thinking of the extended warranty > for 7years/130000 km for 1000$ Canadian. What do you guys think , are people > taking it. Basic warranty is 3 year for bumper to bumper and 5 years for > powertrain and tranny. I have had two Hondas before 93 Civic and 92 Accord > and never had a problem before 8 years, but I hear quality is not what it > used to be, excellent compared to everybody else but not the same comparted > to older gen Hondas. I am planning to keep this car for at least 8 years > I appreciate the help. No one can judge the worth to you but you. Think of it like this: buying the insurance is a gamble and the odds are stacked against you -- that is why these policies are so profitable. But it's like a casino, you could "win" if you need an expensive covered repair within the policy period. And some cars will certainly need such a repair. Have you considered just putting the $1,000 into a money market account and using it as an auto repair fund? |
|
|||
|
some warranty companies will issue a refund if no claims are ever filed.
but I don't know details of this and I have never tried to get a refund. perhaps others are more familiar with how this works. "cosza" <costa@cae.ca> wrote in message news:eugcti$4iv$1@dns3.cae.ca... Hi I just bought the 2007 civic LX A/T. I am thinking of the extended warranty for 7years/130000 km for 1000$ Canadian. What do you guys think , are people taking it. Basic warranty is 3 year for bumper to bumper and 5 years for powertrain and tranny. I have had two Hondas before 93 Civic and 92 Accord and never had a problem before 8 years, but I hear quality is not what it used to be, excellent compared to everybody else but not the same comparted to older gen Hondas. I am planning to keep this car for at least 8 years I appreciate the help. I believe you have a few months to exercise the extended warranty for the same price Tx again |
|
|||
|
cosza wrote:
> Hi > I just bought the 2007 civic LX A/T. I am thinking of the extended warranty > for 7years/130000 km for 1000$ Canadian. What do you guys think , are people > taking it. Basic warranty is 3 year for bumper to bumper and 5 years for > powertrain and tranny. I have had two Hondas before 93 Civic and 92 Accord > and never had a problem before 8 years, but I hear quality is not what it > used to be, excellent compared to everybody else but not the same comparted > to older gen Hondas. I am planning to keep this car for at least 8 years > I appreciate the help. > > I believe you have a few months to exercise the extended warranty for the > same price > > Tx again > > consider the business proposition for the company offering the warranty: if the car is likely to break down with something that'll cost you, you'll lose money. so you'll only insure prospects that are likely /not/ to fail. also, consider the language of the warranty. when i read the fine print on the warranty my grandmother bought, it only covered the stuff that never fails, like crankshaft, con rods, etc. stuff that does fail like shocks or suspension bushings, ignition systems, radiators, were excluded. of course, she didn't read this before signing, and the sales droid told her it covered everything, but from what i can see, extended warranties are /highly/ unlikely to be worth it. bank the cash and save it instead. |
|
|||
|
How is the quality in general of this generation. Any mechanics out there
that have seen this car, please comment on their experiences Thanks again "cosza" <costa@cae.ca> wrote in message news:eugcti$4iv$1@dns3.cae.ca... > Hi > I just bought the 2007 civic LX A/T. I am thinking of the extended > warranty for 7years/130000 km for 1000$ Canadian. What do you guys think , > are people taking it. Basic warranty is 3 year for bumper to bumper and 5 > years for powertrain and tranny. I have had two Hondas before 93 Civic > and 92 Accord and never had a problem before 8 years, but I hear quality > is not what it used to be, excellent compared to everybody else but not > the same comparted to older gen Hondas. I am planning to keep this car for > at least 8 years > I appreciate the help. > > I believe you have a few months to exercise the extended warranty for the > same price > > Tx again > |
|
|||
|
Some have had their glitches, but I own one and haven't had a problem yet. I have never owned a honda previous to this but I was really taken with this generation civic. -- BlackGT2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackGT2000's Profile: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...?userid=336868 View this thread: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=688360 http://www.automotiveforums.com |
|
|||
|
Only buy a Honda warranty. If it isn't from Honda, forget about it. Price
the Honda on line. Should be around $1000 US for zero deductible 120k 7 or 8 years (I forgot). One advantage of buying is for resale. I instead of trading a car in you sell it a few months before the transferable service agreement ends. You will sell quickly at a high end price if the car is in good shape since you can effectively provide a warranty with it. "cosza" <costa@cae.ca> wrote in message news:eugcti$4iv$1@dns3.cae.ca... > Hi > I just bought the 2007 civic LX A/T. I am thinking of the extended > warranty for 7years/130000 km for 1000$ Canadian. What do you guys think , > are people taking it. Basic warranty is 3 year for bumper to bumper and 5 > years for powertrain and tranny. I have had two Hondas before 93 Civic > and 92 Accord and never had a problem before 8 years, but I hear quality > is not what it used to be, excellent compared to everybody else but not > the same comparted to older gen Hondas. I am planning to keep this car for > at least 8 years > I appreciate the help. > > I believe you have a few months to exercise the extended warranty for the > same price > > Tx again > |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2007 civic LX extended warranty - should I go for it | cosza | Honda 3 | 1 | 25 Apr 2007 05:04 pm |
| Nissan Altima 2007 vs. Honda Accord 2007 | success_ny@yahoo.com | Honda 2 | 3 | 25 Aug 2006 12:53 am |
| Honda Civic LX 2001 extended warranty worth it ? | Arctic Inferno | Honda 2 | 15 | 12 Sep 2004 06:48 pm |
| Honda Civic LX 2001 extended warranty worth it ? | Arctic Inferno | Honda 3 | 5 | 30 Aug 2004 07:40 am |