Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Something I recently noticed while researching the CR-V as a possible
choice. The rear bumper and the rear hatch. If the rear bumper is hit, so is the rear hatch and any minor or major damage to the bumper is nothing compared to the repair cost of the rear hatch. Suddenly the side opening RAV-4 with the outside mounted spare looks much more appealing. While this issue is a design flaw, it is yet another strike against the CR-V on my checklist. Comments? Suggestions? Solutions? Anything to help with my research is greatly appreciated! ![]() _________ ===fish=== ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ |
|
|||
|
I have owned lots of fords and haven't had any real flaws. My father owns a 97 chevy express van and that thing has doors that open into themselves. If you look at any of them that have the barn doors rather than the sliding side door, you will see creases in them. -- BlackGT2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackGT2000's Profile: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...?userid=336868 View this thread: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=657989 http://www.automotiveforums.com |
|
|||
|
jim beam disrespectfully sez...
> hey, why don't you go buy a ford? Welcome to the Internet, Mr. Beam. I am researching for my next motor vehicle and unlike you, I am an actual adult. So, until you reach the age where your parents allow you to get your learner's permit, just SHUT UP!! Freedom of speech. Don't like it? Go away, troll!! |
|
|||
|
fish wrote:
> jim beam disrespectfully sez... > >> hey, why don't you go buy a ford? > > Welcome to the Internet, Mr. Beam. > > I am researching for my next motor vehicle and unlike you, I am an actual > adult. > > So, until you reach the age where your parents allow you to get your > learner's permit, just SHUT UP!! > > Freedom of speech. > > Don't like it? > > Go away, troll!! > > er, weren't you digging up scare stories and posting them with such emotive headings as "CR-V Fires and Explosions"? bottom line, if you want to play without parental protection kiddo, you better get ready to deal with the response public display of stupidity is going to get you. |
|
|||
|
In article <w6nlh.549$PN2.140@trnddc07>, i.am.such.ah.fish@new.york
says... > jim beam disrespectfully sez... > > > hey, why don't you go buy a ford? > > Welcome to the Internet, Mr. Beam. > > I am researching for my next motor vehicle and unlike you, I am an actual > adult. No, you're rather pathetically looking for reassurance because you can't trust your own opinion. Please, do us all a favor and buy anything BUT a CR-V. We'd hate to read about your fiery death when you can't open the back hatch after an oil change. --Gene |
|
|||
|
"fish" <i.am.such.ah.fish@new.york> wrote in
news:uJllh.86$tc5.63@trnddc01: > Something I recently noticed while researching the CR-V as a possible > choice. > > The rear bumper and the rear hatch. > > If the rear bumper is hit, so is the rear hatch and any minor or major > damage to the bumper is nothing compared to the repair cost of the > rear hatch. > > Suddenly the side opening RAV-4 with the outside mounted spare looks > much more appealing. So if the RAV-4's rear bumper is hit, its door and spare tire will escape injury? How do you determine that? -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
|
|||
|
Interesting you would come to that conclusion. One of the auto magazines
(sorry, I don't remember which) came to exactly the opposite conclusion when evaluating the previous CR-V and RAV-4 because in a rear end collision the spare tire becomes the bumper and the tailgate, as well as the surrounding opening, is virtually guaranteed to be destroyed. On 12/29/06 10:15 PM, in article uJllh.86$tc5.63@trnddc01, "fish" <i.am.such.ah.fish@new.york> wrote: > Something I recently noticed while researching the CR-V as a possible > choice. > > The rear bumper and the rear hatch. > > If the rear bumper is hit, so is the rear hatch and any minor or major > damage to the bumper is nothing compared to the repair cost of the rear > hatch. > > Suddenly the side opening RAV-4 with the outside mounted spare looks much > more appealing. > > While this issue is a design flaw, it is yet another strike against the CR-V > on my checklist. > > Comments? Suggestions? Solutions? > > Anything to help with my research is greatly appreciated! ![]() > _________ > ===fish=== > ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ > > |
|
|||
|
Spare tires don't collapse and do lots of damage themselves.
"fish" <i.am.such.ah.fish@new.york> wrote in message news:uJllh.86$tc5.63@trnddc01... > Something I recently noticed while researching the CR-V as a possible > choice. > > The rear bumper and the rear hatch. > > If the rear bumper is hit, so is the rear hatch and any minor or major > damage to the bumper is nothing compared to the repair cost of the rear > hatch. > > Suddenly the side opening RAV-4 with the outside mounted spare looks much > more appealing. > > While this issue is a design flaw, it is yet another strike against the > CR-V on my checklist. > > Comments? Suggestions? Solutions? > > Anything to help with my research is greatly appreciated! ![]() > _________ > ===fish=== > ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ > |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2006 Civic Design Flaw | Richard Kuroski | Honda 2 | 18 | 22 Apr 2006 09:38 pm |
| 92 Civic EX electrical glitch | Hank | Honda 3 | 3 | 26 Aug 2005 09:01 am |
| New design grilles for CIVIC | Leon Chen | Honda 2 | 0 | 06 Mar 2005 01:15 am |
| First glitch in 2004 Accord auto trans | JXStern | Honda 2 | 0 | 08 Jul 2004 04:49 pm |
| USA: 2004 Accord Design Changes? | Jimbo | Honda 3 | 3 | 10 Aug 2003 09:37 am |