Honda Car Forum | |
|
|||
|
Your back brakes will last a lot longer than the fronts.
My 98 civic didn't need rear replacements on the shoes until about 225000kms t cinerama wrote: >Sorry guys. I just finished talking to the Honda dealer. She was got >the pads and shoes mixed up. I have 60% left on the front and 66% left >on the back brakes. -- Message posted via CarKB.com http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200609/1 |
|
|||
|
I think all the shops do for the rear shoes (and probably
front pads) is a crude, ruler measurement of the linings (shoes and pads). That's what I do when I check my brakes. That 66% is just a guesstimate. Sounds like all's normal brake lining-wise on your car to me. "cinerama" <roland.lataille@po.state.ct.us> wrote > Sorry guys. I just finished talking to the Honda dealer. > She was got > the pads and shoes mixed up. I have 60% left on the front > and 66% left > on the back brakes. > |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rear brakes gone at 20k | JXStern | Honda 2 | 8 | 14 Sep 2005 11:14 am |
| Del Sol S rear brakes | Terry M | Honda 3 | 1 | 06 Aug 2004 01:02 pm |
| rear brakes on '99 3.2TL | the donald | Acura | 0 | 06 Jul 2004 09:36 am |
| 2003 TL, Type-S, Front brakes - vibration, Rear brakes - wear | Alex Vilner | Acura | 6 | 20 Aug 2003 09:09 am |
| Re: 99 Civic rear brakes | Peter Doherty | Honda 2 | 0 | 13 Aug 2003 11:55 am |