Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Is this normal? I just brought my Honda Civic in for it's 20,000 mile
service. I purchased this car 9/7/2005 so, it's only a year old. I drive mostly highway. They tell me the front brake pads are at 60% left and the rear are at 20% left. I have never had a car that worn the brakes so fast. I do very little city driving. Thanks, Roland |
|
|||
|
Are you sure the shop did not reverse the wear findings,
and, in fact, it is the fronts that are worn more? Which Civic do you have? I see the LX has brake pads in front and brake shoes in the wear. Brake shoes do not wear quickly at all. So what you report would be particularly surprising. Honda brake pads OTOH are known to wear quickly. But they also are less noisy, less dusty, and are less likely to overly wear the brake rotors than aftermarket pads. "cinerama" <roland.lataille@po.state.ct.us> wrote > Is this normal? I just brought my Honda Civic in for it's > 20,000 mile > service. I purchased this car 9/7/2005 so, it's only a > year old. I > drive mostly highway. They tell me the front brake pads > are at 60% left > and the rear are at 20% left. I have never had a car that > worn the > brakes so fast. I do very little city driving. > > Thanks, > > Roland > |
|
|||
|
I have a Civic LX. It's type written.
Elle wrote: > Are you sure the shop did not reverse the wear findings, > and, in fact, it is the fronts that are worn more? Which > Civic do you have? I see the LX has brake pads in front and > brake shoes in the wear. Brake shoes do not wear quickly at > all. So what you report would be particularly surprising. > > Honda brake pads OTOH are known to wear quickly. But they > also are less noisy, less dusty, and are less likely to > overly wear the brake rotors than aftermarket pads. > > "cinerama" <roland.lataille@po.state.ct.us> wrote > > Is this normal? I just brought my Honda Civic in for it's > > 20,000 mile > > service. I purchased this car 9/7/2005 so, it's only a > > year old. I > > drive mostly highway. They tell me the front brake pads > > are at 60% left > > and the rear are at 20% left. I have never had a car that > > worn the > > brakes so fast. I do very little city driving. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Roland > > |
|
|||
|
Get a second opinion. Any brake shop will do. Just don't let
them re-line the brakes (= new pads in fronts, new shoes in back) unless they use OEM. Or, if you're a little handy, you can go measure what are called the "brake linings" (in your Civic's case, pads in front, shoes in rear) yourself. For the rears, this amount of wear in this amount of time is bizarre. "cinerama" <roland.lataille@po.state.ct.us> wrote >I have a Civic LX. It's type written. > > Elle wrote: >> Are you sure the shop did not reverse the wear findings, >> and, in fact, it is the fronts that are worn more? Which >> Civic do you have? I see the LX has brake pads in front >> and >> brake shoes in the wear. Brake shoes do not wear quickly >> at >> all. So what you report would be particularly surprising. >> >> Honda brake pads OTOH are known to wear quickly. But they >> also are less noisy, less dusty, and are less likely to >> overly wear the brake rotors than aftermarket pads. >> >> "cinerama" <roland.lataille@po.state.ct.us> wrote >> > Is this normal? I just brought my Honda Civic in for >> > it's >> > 20,000 mile >> > service. I purchased this car 9/7/2005 so, it's only a >> > year old. I >> > drive mostly highway. They tell me the front brake pads >> > are at 60% left >> > and the rear are at 20% left. I have never had a car >> > that >> > worn the >> > brakes so fast. I do very little city driving. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Roland >> > > |
|
|||
|
I am going on 80,000 miles on my Civic, and just thinking about checking the
linings for wear. The only thing I know that would wear rear brakes that fast is leaving the parking brake on. Earle "cinerama" <roland.lataille@po.state.ct.us> wrote in message news:1158404375.967411.11600@m7g2000cwm.googlegrou ps.com... > Is this normal? I just brought my Honda Civic in for it's 20,000 mile > service. I purchased this car 9/7/2005 so, it's only a year old. I > drive mostly highway. They tell me the front brake pads are at 60% left > and the rear are at 20% left. I have never had a car that worn the > brakes so fast. I do very little city driving. > > Thanks, > > Roland > |
|
|||
|
yep, exactly. driving with parking brake on will do the trick. -- MishaA ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MishaA's Profile: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...?userid=469060 View this thread: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=620046 http://www.automotiveforums.com |
|
|||
|
Check to see if it has EBD. If it does it will eat rear brakes for lunch. My
2005 Accord has it and I'm about 35% left on the rears and 60% on the fronts. The best part of EBD is the fact when you brake aggressively the front end doesn't nose dive as much as a car without it. "cinerama" <roland.lataille@po.state.ct.us> wrote in message news:1158404375.967411.11600@m7g2000cwm.googlegrou ps.com... > Is this normal? I just brought my Honda Civic in for it's 20,000 mile > service. I purchased this car 9/7/2005 so, it's only a year old. I > drive mostly highway. They tell me the front brake pads are at 60% left > and the rear are at 20% left. I have never had a car that worn the > brakes so fast. I do very little city driving. > > Thanks, > > Roland > |
|
|||
|
No, I always use my right foot. I had a 1991 Honda Civic DX (that I
bought new) and the brakes wore out after about 25,000 miles. ottguit@hotmail.com wrote: > I hope you're no driving with the left foot on the brake, if you brake > with Left foot, that might be the problem, keep the foot away from the > pedal. > Bg |
|
|||
|
cinerama wrote: > > No, I always use my right foot. I had a 1991 Honda Civic DX (that I > bought new) and the brakes wore out after about 25,000 miles. > > ottguit@hotmail.com wrote: > > I hope you're no driving with the left foot on the brake, if you brake > > with Left foot, that might be the problem, keep the foot away from the > > pedal. > > Bg Rear drum brakes on any front disk brake car should go well past 100K... JT |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rear pads worn | zonie | Honda 3 | 2 | 18 Nov 2006 09:11 pm |
| 2005 Honda Civic EX - 555 miles on one tank! | cinerama | Honda 3 | 24 | 13 Jul 2006 12:53 pm |
| FS: 2005 Honda Pilot EX (SUV) - $26,000 - only 6K MILES! | eternalife@comcast.net | Honda 3 | 0 | 01 Feb 2006 06:50 pm |
| Honda Accord 2004 Back Brakes Worn Already | lucid1 | Honda 3 | 5 | 09 Nov 2005 06:18 pm |
| Brakes on 93 Honda Accord LX 152,000 miles | John | Honda 2 | 1 | 08 Oct 2003 11:06 pm |