Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Earle Horton wrote:
> Whatever. It's an automatic, isn't it, with a torque converter? no, it's cvt, continuously variable transmission. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continu...e_transmission > The manual > I got with the HX recommends changing the fluid in the cvt every 15,000 > miles, which says to me that it is a transmission that is continuously > wearing itself out as you use it. And that will be Honda Genuine > Transmission Fluid too. I don' need no stinkin' automatic, thanks. You can > pry the stick shift from my cold, dead hands. > > Cheers, > > Earle > > "jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote in message > news:6P2dnTM3ia1fGZrYnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... >> Earle Horton wrote: >>> You mis-spelled "junk". I got the stick shift. >> no i didn't. the cvt will give you better mileage - it's always in >> /exactly/ the most efficient ratio. >> >>> Earle >>> >>> "jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote in message >>> news:CPudnRCOIZv9HJrYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... >>>> Earle Horton wrote: >>>>> My 1999 HX, "special" low emissions, high mileage model, gets 40-45 > mpg. >>>> that hx, with cvt, is a wonder, the cvt part particularly - it makes a >>>> /huge/ difference. "hybrid" is bunk. >>>> >>>>> Earle >>>>> >>>>> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:45077D67.E0A299AE@GrumpyvilleNOT.com... >>>>>> My ancient '83 Civic just runs better and better. Today's fill up - >>>>>> 41.2 mpg for mixed driving... >>>>>> >>>>>> JT >>> > > |
|
|||
|
dold@XReXXWhoXN.usenet.us.com wrote: > > Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpster@grumpyvillenot.com> wrote: > > dold@XReXXWhoXN.usenet.us.com wrote: > > > I'm having a hard time comparing the current costs of a salvaged 1983 car > > > verses a 2006 car. > > > Current Investment > > ? Less than $1K total investment + my sweat equity > > Features: > > ? A/C > > ? Simpler components reasonably easy to reach/work on > > ? No friggin' power steering > > ? Used look = Less attraction to thieves etc. > > ? Goes down the road 70-80 mph nicely > > A friend who did an extreme amount of driving became convinced that the > best dollar value was a used taxicab. They didn't look very good, which is > one of the features you listed. They had A/C, and power steering, don't > know why you wouldn't want that, unless you consider it a potential repair > problem. > If someone needs power steering on a 1,900 lb car, they have a serious problem. > If something bad happened, he just parked it in front of a wrecking yard if > it was still drivable, and bought another one. > > I don't think he ever even changed oil. > > > ? 42+ MPG > > Probably not, but he had less invested than you, and no sweat equity. > I think he comes out ahead. > > No worries about collision insurance, or the loss of a prized vehicle. > Ah, but I do have insurance and a good running gen2 will bring $2,500 any day of the week on eBay, especially one from rust free Texas... JT |
|
|||
|
Elle wrote: > > "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote > > Current Investment > > . Less than $1K total investment + my sweat equity > > . Breezed through inspection > > . Consumables such as gas & oil > > > > Features: > > . A/C > > Bum. All I had to do to get it going was replace the receiver dryer, flush the evaporator (the condenser is new --- $15 on ebay), add a return line filter to protect the compressor and yep, it took the R-134 and is cool as can be. I love it!!! > > ;-) > > > . Simpler components reasonably easy to reach/work on > > . No friggin' power steering > > . Used look = Less attraction to thieves etc. > > \ . Goes down the road 70-80 mph nicely > > . 42+ MPG > > > > Advantages: > > . No payments > > . Low insurance > > . Generally cheap parts > > . More money left over to give to charities. :-) Especially when charity begins at home... <G> JT (Who is about to spiff up another $200 '82 Civic DX just purchased for a quick eBay turn...) |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:15:53 GMT, Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote:
>If someone needs power steering on a 1,900 lb car, they have a serious problem. It depends on the car. I had a '76 toyota corona 'wagon' w/out assist whose steering wheel could only be turned while the car was rolling. Do you have some bizzare notion that a 3000 lb. car can absolutely need power steering, but a 2000 lb. never needs it? It's only a 30% difference. |
|
|||
|
AZ Nomad wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:15:53 GMT, Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote: > > >If someone needs power steering on a 1,900 lb car, they have a serious problem. > > It depends on the car. I had a '76 toyota corona 'wagon' w/out assist whose > steering wheel could only be turned while the car was rolling. > > Do you have some bizzare notion that a 3000 lb. car can absolutely need power > steering, but a 2000 lb. never needs it? It's only a 30% difference. Why would one turn a steering wheel if one is not going anywhere? JT |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:33:20 GMT, Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote:
>AZ Nomad wrote: >> >> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:15:53 GMT, Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote: >> >> >If someone needs power steering on a 1,900 lb car, they have a serious problem. >> >> It depends on the car. I had a '76 toyota corona 'wagon' w/out assist whose >> steering wheel could only be turned while the car was rolling. >> >> Do you have some bizzare notion that a 3000 lb. car can absolutely need power >> steering, but a 2000 lb. never needs it? It's only a 30% difference. >Why would one turn a steering wheel if one is not going anywhere? Parking. |
|
|||
|
I had 2 83 tercel 4WD wagons. They did not have power steering. They needed it. They also needed a bigger engine and decent brakes. "AZ Nomad" <aznomad@PmunOgeBOX.com> wrote in message news:slrnegit2r.c0c.aznomad@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net... > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:15:53 GMT, Grumpy AuContraire > <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote: > > > >>If someone needs power steering on a 1,900 lb car, they have a serious >>problem. > > It depends on the car. I had a '76 toyota corona 'wagon' w/out assist > whose > steering wheel could only be turned while the car was rolling. > > Do you have some bizzare notion that a 3000 lb. car can absolutely need > power > steering, but a 2000 lb. never needs it? It's only a 30% difference. > |
|
|||
|
My honda hybrid always get atleast 45 mpg, sometimes closer to 50 in
the winter. http://www.safelotvegas.com/index.php Grumpy AuContraire wrote: > My ancient '83 Civic just runs better and better. Today's fill up - > 41.2 mpg for mixed driving... > > JT |
|
|||
|
AZ Nomad wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:33:20 GMT, Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote: > > >AZ Nomad wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:15:53 GMT, Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote: > >> > >> >If someone needs power steering on a 1,900 lb car, they have a serious problem. > >> > >> It depends on the car. I had a '76 toyota corona 'wagon' w/out assist whose > >> steering wheel could only be turned while the car was rolling. > >> > >> Do you have some bizzare notion that a 3000 lb. car can absolutely need power > >> steering, but a 2000 lb. never needs it? It's only a 30% difference. > > >Why would one turn a steering wheel if one is not going anywhere? > > Parking. You still have to move the car to park... JT |
|
|||
|
Safelot@lvcoxmail.com wrote: > > My honda hybrid always get atleast 45 mpg, sometimes closer to 50 in > the winter. http://www.safelotvegas.com/index.php > Grumpy AuContraire wrote: > > My ancient '83 Civic just runs better and better. Today's fill up - > > 41.2 mpg for mixed driving... > > > > JT Tell me your total cost per mile... JT |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fit hybrid ? | anyone | Honda 3 | 14 | 14 Aug 2006 04:29 am |
| Hybrid Accord | J Katz | Honda 2 | 4 | 11 Oct 2005 02:15 am |
| Civic Hybrid | billnech@msn.com | Honda 3 | 8 | 12 Dec 2004 11:38 am |
| worries about the honda civic hybrid (or any hybrid) | Matthew Lasar | Honda 3 | 24 | 30 May 2004 12:51 pm |
| Hybrid | Jim85CJ | Honda 3 | 32 | 29 May 2004 08:41 pm |