Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06 Jun 2006, 01:25 pm
Grumpy AuContraire
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ping: Elle, Michael, Teggar...

On my "antique" '83 Honda Civic 1300 FE, I can find no reference on
changing the timing belt other than an "inspection" at 60K (miles). I
have the factory manual and owner's manual.

The current belt is new but would I be correct to assume that 60K is a
good time to change it out?

BTW, I'm still driving it (in shakedown mode) and so far, all seems to
be working after a nearly two year rehab effort...

JT
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06 Jun 2006, 02:48 pm
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elle, Michael, Teggar...

From the book side, neither the UK site's factory service
manuals, Chilton's, nor Autozone.com's free online manuals
specify an interval for the timing belt.

The following say 60k miles for your Civic:
www.gates.com
and
http://www.motorwatch.com/automotive...imingBelts.pdf
These two site says it's the same for similarly aged
Preludes and Accords.

Wasn't 60k miles the standard for many makes of vehicles of
this era?

The timing belt sells for only $21 at Majestic. Perhaps it's
a flimsier design appropriate for a smaller engine, but its
fatigue life is shorter as a result?

I suppose there's a good mechanical explanation for why the
mileage interval is so short and why there's no time
interval. I have been lurking at another Honda forum lately:
http://www.honda-tech.com/ . If you want more of an
explanation, you might register there and ask. I think it's
free.

Your project sounds like fun. Me, I'm happy having just
installed three new bushings in the (older, more rusted)
rear control arm of my 91 Civic within 1.5 hours (hurrah!).

"Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote
> On my "antique" '83 Honda Civic 1300 FE, I can find no
> reference on
> changing the timing belt other than an "inspection" at 60K
> (miles). I
> have the factory manual and owner's manual.
>
> The current belt is new but would I be correct to assume
> that 60K is a
> good time to change it out?
>
> BTW, I'm still driving it (in shakedown mode) and so far,
> all seems to
> be working after a nearly two year rehab effort...
>
> JT



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06 Jun 2006, 05:59 pm
Grumpy AuContraire
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elle, Michael, Teggar...



Elle wrote:
>
> From the book side, neither the UK site's factory service
> manuals, Chilton's, nor Autozone.com's free online manuals
> specify an interval for the timing belt.
>


Thanks for confirming this. At my point in life, I have been known to
overlook (forget) things. I ain't goin' nutz after all!


> The following say 60k miles for your Civic:
> www.gates.com
> and
> http://www.motorwatch.com/automotive...imingBelts.pdf
> These two site says it's the same for similarly aged
> Preludes and Accords.
>
> Wasn't 60k miles the standard for many makes of vehicles of
> this era?
>


I believe it is. Besides, it's about the same time that the water pumps
tend to go belly up.


> The timing belt sells for only $21 at Majestic. Perhaps it's
> a flimsier design appropriate for a smaller engine, but its
> fatigue life is shorter as a result?
>


Good question but no answer from here...



> I suppose there's a good mechanical explanation for why the
> mileage interval is so short and why there's no time
> interval. I have been lurking at another Honda forum lately:
> http://www.honda-tech.com/ . If you want more of an
> explanation, you might register there and ask. I think it's
> free.
>
> Your project sounds like fun. Me, I'm happy having just
> installed three new bushings in the (older, more rusted)
> rear control arm of my 91 Civic within 1.5 hours (hurrah!).
>


It was a languishing project until last fall when gas prices pushed the
$3 level after Katrina. The engine had already been swapped and all
that remained was hooking all the stuff up. I got a price of $250 (a
bargain) from a local independent shop to do that but when no progress
was being made after the car being there for a couple of months, I took
the task on my own.

I am now driving the car on a regular basis and it's getting 30+ mpg at
present. I am sure that some of the emissions stuff isn't working
properly and probably a few hoses are hooked up wrong. But sooner or
later, I nail down as much as I can and proudly be giving every gas
station that I pass the single finger salute!

I have about a grand (including the cost of the car + parts car) into
this and I like the relatively simplicity compared to today's vehicles.
Besides, it has neat racing side trim that was possibly installed by the
original dealer here in town and the original radio still works fine...

<G>

JT




> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote
> > On my "antique" '83 Honda Civic 1300 FE, I can find no
> > reference on
> > changing the timing belt other than an "inspection" at 60K
> > (miles). I
> > have the factory manual and owner's manual.
> >
> > The current belt is new but would I be correct to assume
> > that 60K is a
> > good time to change it out?
> >
> > BTW, I'm still driving it (in shakedown mode) and so far,
> > all seems to
> > be working after a nearly two year rehab effort...
> >
> > JT

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06 Jun 2006, 06:09 pm
Elmo P. Shagnasty
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elle, Michael, Teggar...

In article <r_khg.9863$921.1211@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink. net>,
"Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

> The following say 60k miles for your Civic:
> www.gates.com
> and
> http://www.motorwatch.com/automotive...imingBelts.pdf
> These two site says it's the same for similarly aged
> Preludes and Accords.
>
> Wasn't 60k miles the standard for many makes of vehicles of
> this era?
>
> The timing belt sells for only $21 at Majestic. Perhaps it's
> a flimsier design appropriate for a smaller engine, but its
> fatigue life is shorter as a result?
>
> I suppose there's a good mechanical explanation for why the
> mileage interval is so short and why there's no time
> interval.


Number 1, Gates sells belts. Gee, do you think they might have a vested
interest here?

And number 2, the belt change interval has gone up over the years mostly
because of advances in the belt material and construction. Nothing more.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06 Jun 2006, 07:00 pm
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 83 1.3L Civic [was Re: Elle, Michael, Teggar...]

"Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote
> It was a languishing project until last fall when gas
> prices pushed the
> $3 level after Katrina. The engine had already been
> swapped and all
> that remained was hooking all the stuff up. I got a price
> of $250 (a
> bargain) from a local independent shop to do that but when
> no progress
> was being made after the car being there for a couple of
> months, I took
> the task on my own.
>
> I am now driving the car on a regular basis and it's
> getting 30+ mpg at
> present. I am sure that some of the emissions stuff isn't
> working
> properly and probably a few hoses are hooked up wrong.
> But sooner or
> later, I nail down as much as I can and proudly be giving
> every gas
> station that I pass the single finger salute!
>
> I have about a grand (including the cost of the car +
> parts car) into
> this and I like the relatively simplicity compared to
> today's vehicles.
> Besides, it has neat racing side trim that was possibly
> installed by the
> original dealer here in town and the original radio still
> works fine...
>
> <G>


Care to share a picture? Tegger might be willing to put it
up at his site, or I'll throw it up at my site for a
temporary period.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06 Jun 2006, 07:46 pm
TeGGeR®
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Ping: Elle, Michael, Teggar...

Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote in
news:4485C9E8.83278B28@GrumpyvilleNOT.com:

> On my "antique" '83 Honda Civic 1300 FE, I can find no reference on
> changing the timing belt other than an "inspection" at 60K (miles). I
> have the factory manual and owner's manual.
>
> The current belt is new but would I be correct to assume that 60K is a
> good time to change it out?
>
> BTW, I'm still driving it (in shakedown mode) and so far, all seems to
> be working after a nearly two year rehab effort...
>
>



60K was probably for the original belt. New OEM belts are much better made
than those in 1983, and you can likely go by the modern 7yr/105K limit
(provided the belt you buy is actually new and isn't just NOS).

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07 Jun 2006, 01:10 am
Grumpy AuContraire
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 83 1.3L Civic [was Re: Elle, Michael, Teggar...]



Elle wrote:
>
> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote
> > It was a languishing project until last fall when gas
> > prices pushed the
> > $3 level after Katrina. The engine had already been
> > swapped and all
> > that remained was hooking all the stuff up. I got a price
> > of $250 (a
> > bargain) from a local independent shop to do that but when
> > no progress
> > was being made after the car being there for a couple of
> > months, I took
> > the task on my own.
> >
> > I am now driving the car on a regular basis and it's
> > getting 30+ mpg at
> > present. I am sure that some of the emissions stuff isn't
> > working
> > properly and probably a few hoses are hooked up wrong.
> > But sooner or
> > later, I nail down as much as I can and proudly be giving
> > every gas
> > station that I pass the single finger salute!
> >
> > I have about a grand (including the cost of the car +
> > parts car) into
> > this and I like the relatively simplicity compared to
> > today's vehicles.
> > Besides, it has neat racing side trim that was possibly
> > installed by the
> > original dealer here in town and the original radio still
> > works fine...
> >
> > <G>

>
> Care to share a picture? Tegger might be willing to put it
> up at his site, or I'll throw it up at my site for a
> temporary period.




Sure, I'll get a couple to you in the next day or so. They'll be small
file size JPEGs.

JT
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07 Jun 2006, 06:03 am
TeGGeR®
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elle, Michael, Teggar...

Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote in
news:44860A2C.DA69720A@GrumpyvilleNOT.com:

>
>
> Elle wrote:
>>
>> From the book side, neither the UK site's factory service
>> manuals, Chilton's, nor Autozone.com's free online manuals
>> specify an interval for the timing belt.
>>

>
> Thanks for confirming this. At my point in life, I have been known to
> overlook (forget) things. I ain't goin' nutz after all!




Your owner's manual specifies the timing belt change interval, as do all
factory shop manuals. It is in the same maintenance table as all other
maintenance items.

That aftermarket sources do not specify a change interval speaks more to
the quality (or lack thereof) of those sources than anything else.


--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07 Jun 2006, 08:06 am
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elle, Michael, Teggar...

"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote
Re the timing belt change interval for a 1.3L 1983 Civic--
> Your owner's manual specifies the timing belt change
> interval, as do all
> factory shop manuals. It is in the same maintenance table
> as all other
> maintenance items.


Would you please find the page in the UK site's 1984-87
Civic factory shop manual that specifies the timing belt
change interval?

I don't see it here
http://media.honda.co.uk/car/owner/m...2sb200/4-5.pdf

or here

http://media.honda.co.uk/car/owner/m...2sb200/4-7.pdf


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07 Jun 2006, 08:12 am
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 83 1.3L Civic [was Re: Elle, Michael, Teggar...]

"Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpster@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote
Elle
>> Care to share a picture? Tegger might be willing to put
>> it
>> up at his site, or I'll throw it up at my site for a
>> temporary period.

>
>
>
> Sure, I'll get a couple to you in the next day or so.
> They'll be small
> file size JPEGs.


Great! I'll make it the "Honda of the Month" at my site and
post some of the history you gave on it. I love the look of
those older Civics. :-)


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
88 Civic LX...Ping, Clatter, Ping!! Advice/Pointers? FunkyKev Honda 3 1 28 Sep 2006 10:26 pm
Ping Elle-MichaelP-Tegger... Grumpy AuContraire Honda 3 2 15 Jul 2006 05:10 pm
Ping Curly Eddie G Honda 2 3 19 Jun 2006 07:57 pm
Ping: Elle, Tegger, Michael Pardee Stephen H Honda 2 6 02 May 2006 12:18 am
Ping:tigger Stephen H Honda 3 9 26 Dec 2005 01:28 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.