Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 27 Mar 2006, 03:25 am
Burt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: '89 CRX won't start - frustration

"jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote

> er, ok, so when your *intermittent* fault happens to be /not/ evident
> when you test, and faulty when you're trying to start, then what? fact:
> for this age civic/crx, you're well inside 3 sigma on relay faults.


It doesn't work that way. It fails on or off when the car sits for that
long. Especially, parking overnight the solder joint normally restores
itself. In fact, the OP hears the 2 second after the ignition is on.




Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 27 Mar 2006, 09:13 am
Remco
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: '89 CRX won't start - frustration


ThomasE wrote:
> Oh the ignition wires are pretty old and they are OEM. But could all 4
> wires fail all of a sudden?
>
> I'll do some more methodical testing tomorrow...


Why not just spray some starter fluid into the air intake to see if it
wants to start?
If it then wants to start, you know it most likely is not air or
ignition..

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 27 Mar 2006, 09:52 am
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: '89 CRX won't start - frustration

Three quick checks I'd do on old OEM wires: (1) Run the car
in the dark and look for sparks coming from the wires. (2)
Run the car at idle with the hood up. Spray the wires with
misting water. Listen for changes in the idle speed. That's
a tip off (according to Tegger's site) that they need
replacement. Seems reasonable to me. (3) Check the wire
resistance. Should be under 15,000 ohms each.

Old wires are said to be harder on the ignition coil, too.
So it pays to replace them (with new OEM ones).

You sound plenty expert in your automotive knowledge. I hope
you nail this one, soon! Should be good.

"ThomasE" <lester12@yahoo.com> wrote
> Oh the ignition wires are pretty old and they are OEM. But
> could all 4
> wires fail all of a sudden?
>
> I'll do some more methodical testing tomorrow...
>
>
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 27 Mar 2006, 10:37 am
Matt Ion
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: '89 CRX won't start - frustration

Elle wrote:
> Three quick checks I'd do on old OEM wires: (1) Run the car
> in the dark and look for sparks coming from the wires. (2)
> Run the car at idle with the hood up.


That's a good idea, except the car won't run...


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0612-4, 03/25/2006
Tested on: 3/27/2006 7:37:47 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 27 Mar 2006, 10:55 am
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: '89 CRX won't start - frustration

"Matt Ion" <soundy@moltenimage.com> wrote
> Elle wrote:
>> Three quick checks I'd do on old OEM wires: (1) Run the
>> car in the dark and look for sparks coming from the
>> wires. (2) Run the car at idle with the hood up.

>
> That's a good idea, except the car won't run...



Oops. :-)


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 27 Mar 2006, 04:21 pm
ThomasE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default UPDATE

UPDATE
Thank you very much for your support. Sometimes just knowing that somebody
else is just as puzzled gives you energy to keep investigating…
Today the car did finally start but unfortunately without revealing any
clues as to what the problem is, so I’m sure that this no start problem
will reappear sooner or later.

Here is what I did today Monday in the order I did it:

1. First I tried to crank the engine without doing anything, just in case

Cranked engine - No start.

2. Then CLEANED SPARK PLUGS: I took out all 4 spark plugs and cleaned them
with wire brush and adjusted the gap (the gap had increased to about 1.2mm,
I reset it to 0.9mm). The plugs did not seem fouled with oil or gasoline
although there was a faint smell of gasoline on them, normal I assume
although I have not tried to debug such problems before. Plug electrode
appearance looked normal to me just a light gray very few deposits which I
removed with wire brush. Cleaned the wire ends and spark plug hole and
reinstalled the spark plugs.
Cranked engine – NO START – perhaps an occasional very weak firing as
usual.

3. Then SPRAYED STARTER FLUID INTO INTAKE MANIFOLD: Took out the air hose
at the intake manifold, opened the throttle butterfly to make sure the
started fluid would go in, and then sprayed starter fluid directly into
the intake manifold for 3-4 seconds. I could not see inside the intake
manifold but I opened the throttle butterfly and inserted a screwdriver
into it, to make sure there were no other obstructions, all was fine.
Cranked engine - NO START - perhaps an occasional very weak firing as
usual.

4. REPEATED SPRAYING STARTER FLUID INTO INTAKE for another 3-4 seconds
just to make sure,
Cranked engine - NO START -perhaps an occasional very weak firing as
usual.

5. CLEANED THE DISTRIBUTOR: Since I had already checked for spark a couple
of days ago, I removed the plastic black distributor housing, it did not
seem dirty inside but cleaned it anyway with some alcohol.
Cranked engine - NO START -perhaps an occasional very weak firing as
usual.

6. INSISTED CRANKING: In frustration, since I was occasionally hearing
weak firing I insisted cranking the engine. Whenever I fully depressed the
accelerator there seemed to be more firing. After two 20second cranks it
seemed that the firing had increased. The firing seemed smooth (that is,
it did not seem that just a few cylinders were firing it just seemed like
weak uniform firing but I could be wrong). At the end of the third 20
second crank it started firing more and I kept cranking more until the
engine finally RELUCTANTLY STARTED somewhat erratically first for about 5
seconds and then normal. Quite a bit of smoke came out of the exhaust but
that could have been the started fluid. Once started the high idle was
normal, engine noise normal, revving up normal, no smoke from exhaust. I
let it idle for a couple of minutes and then turned it off.
I waited 1 minute, re-cranked and it started normally.
Turned engine off. Waited 15 minutes cranked- started normally.
Took car for test drive all was normal. Accelerated at full throttle going
35mph on a steep hill power was normal no missing or other signs of fuel
starvation.
Turned engine off, waited 30 minutes cranked – started normally.
Turned engine off, waited 1 hour cranked – started normally.

With the engine idling I did the SPRAY BOTTLE TEST sprayed spark plug
wires and distributor until they were drenched, no change in idling or
other engine behavior.

With the engine idling I slowly removed each one of the spark plug wires
until the cylinder I was unplugging stopped firing. I noticed that the
spark must be STRONG because it seemed I had to remove the wire by about ½
inch from the spark plug before any one cylinder stopped firing (although
the engine was able to kept idling on 3 cylinders).

The reluctant slow way in which the engine started and the smoke from the
exhaust would point to flooding/fouling but, as I described in step 2, I
had taken out all 4 spark plugs and they seemed clean, besides I cleaned
them thoroughly in step 2 and it still would not start.

Meanwhile throughout this process I could always hear the fuel pump
running for 2 seconds as soon as I turned the ignition.
As I had said in my original posting I had already tested the fuel
pressure last Thursday and I had also tested for spark.

Soooo… I am puzzled. I’m sure the problem will return sooner or later and
I’m running out of diagnostic tests. You are probably starting to think
that I am making all this up to puzzle you…
I will take out the main relay and re-solder it, seems like an easy job,
not much to loose by doing it just in case…


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 27 Mar 2006, 04:32 pm
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: UPDATE

"ThomasE" <lester12@yahoo.com> wrote
> With the engine idling I slowly removed each one of the
> spark plug wires
> until the cylinder I was unplugging stopped firing. I
> noticed that the
> spark must be STRONG because it seemed I had to remove the
> wire by about ½
> inch from the spark plug before any one cylinder stopped
> firing (although
> the engine was able to kept idling on 3 cylinders).


For future reference, doesn't this risk overloading the
ignition coil or something?

See
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/start...tml#checkspark
.. Plus some guy a few months ago did something like you
describe and burned out his ignition coil.

> Soooo. I am puzzled. I'm sure the problem will return
> sooner or later and
> I'm running out of diagnostic tests. You are probably
> starting to think
> that I am making all this up to puzzle you.
> I will take out the main relay and re-solder it, seems
> like an easy job,
> not much to loose by doing it just in case.


Right, I'm not confident it's the main relay, but if you've
really got the time, eliminate it. Unfortunately it's a bit
of a bear to get out. Most folks say leave the casing
bracketed to the wall and just slide out the guts.

Certainly seems like the symptoms point to some odd flooding
condition. Did you dump a bottle of Chevron Techron into the
near empty fuel tank (and then fill the tank) yet?

Be interesting to hear whether the car starts tomorrow...


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 27 Mar 2006, 05:15 pm
ThomasE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: UPDATE

Yes, I was a little concerned about the coil but compared to this
frustrating problem changing the coil did not seem that bad. Besides, as I
tried this on the first cylinder I noticed that even when the wire is
pulled away from the spark, the spark was still discharging from the wire
end to the engine (inside the spark pug hole). The bad thing would be if
the spark had absolutely nowhere to discharge and discharged through the
coil insulation inside the coil. Had that been the case I would have had
second thoughts about repeating the procedure on all cylinders.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 27 Mar 2006, 05:30 pm
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: UPDATE

I understand. You ensured you had a ground. That's the key.

"ThomasE" <lester12@yahoo.com> wrote
> Yes, I was a little concerned about the coil but compared
> to this
> frustrating problem changing the coil did not seem that
> bad. Besides, as I
> tried this on the first cylinder I noticed that even when
> the wire is
> pulled away from the spark, the spark was still
> discharging from the wire
> end to the engine (inside the spark pug hole). The bad
> thing would be if
> the spark had absolutely nowhere to discharge and
> discharged through the
> coil insulation inside the coil. Had that been the case I
> would have had
> second thoughts about repeating the procedure on all
> cylinders.
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 27 Mar 2006, 05:31 pm
Remco
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: UPDATE

ThomasE wrote:
> Yes, I was a little concerned about the coil but compared to this
> frustrating problem changing the coil did not seem that bad. Besides, as I
> tried this on the first cylinder I noticed that even when the wire is
> pulled away from the spark, the spark was still discharging from the wire
> end to the engine (inside the spark pug hole). The bad thing would be if
> the spark had absolutely nowhere to discharge and discharged through the
> coil insulation inside the coil. Had that been the case I would have had
> second thoughts about repeating the procedure on all cylinders.


Now that you've gotten it to start, it occurred to me that I've seen
something like this on a Subaru once where the thermosensor was
defective and adjusted the mixture such that the car just would not
start.
Subarus get into this mode after starting repeatedly where the mixture
goes to a mid range for debug purposes (one can also short two pins
together).

It does the exact same thing you are describing: not starting for a
long time and then suddenly starting. After the car cools down, the
problem would re-appear.

This information was just "for what it is worth" - Subies are quite
different than Hondas but just for giggles check the thermosensor...

Remco

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"S" start Blinks and Car wan’t Start. Mit Honda 2 4 28 Mar 2007 11:24 am
New Yokohama Avid tires on 97 Accord (pull to the left, squirrely handling - endless frustration) techman41973@yahoo.com Honda 3 0 08 Jul 2006 01:01 pm
1997 Passport won't start,clicks, and sometimes takes an hour to start Cozy Honda 3 0 21 Feb 2004 04:03 pm
TL won't start Guest Guest Acura 5 06 Nov 2003 01:35 pm
Re: Help! '92 CRX HF no start Rex B Honda 2 3 30 Jul 2003 02:15 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.