Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 24 Nov 2005, 11:31 am
Steve Pankow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aftermarket CV boots better than OEM?

I had somebody try to tell me that there's a new manufacturer of CV
boots out there that uses thicker rubber than Honda OEM. Unfortunately
I don't remember the name of the maker. Anyone heard of this?

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25 Nov 2005, 10:57 am
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aftermarket CV boots better than OEM?

Steve Pankow wrote:
> I had somebody try to tell me that there's a new manufacturer of CV
> boots out there that uses thicker rubber than Honda OEM. Unfortunately
> I don't remember the name of the maker. Anyone heard of this?
>

er, so what exactly does "thickness" have to do with rubber selection,
rubber quality or component design? i've yet to see an instance where
oem componentry quality did not exceed that of after-market for honda.
you can therefore be confident that oem is the way to go. ford otoh...

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02 Dec 2005, 03:11 am
TE Cheah
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Aftermarket CV boots better than OEM?

| i've yet to see an instance where
| oem componentry quality did not exceed that of after-market for honda.

Honda fits only short branch ( 4 into 1 pipe ), cheap & heavy cast iron
exhaust*manifold for its engines <2.2 litre, even a F22A's *'s twin pipes
are short. Result is lower though adequate torque @ low rpm ( as during
buyers' test drives ), but very low ( <½ as much ) torque & mpg @ high
( >3000 ) rpm, this difference rises with rpm.
http://circletrack.com/techarticles/73598
My local-made 4-2-1 * [i] uses aluminised mild steel [ii] is 13 kg <
original * [iii] has longer twin pipes than a F22A's * [iv] twin pipes'
interiors' total cross section area is 60% > original * ( single pipe )'s.
In 6-02 I saw a new Civic vtec 1.6 litre engine with very short * : a waste
of vtec ( no way is torque / mpg esp @ high rpm maximised ).
www.turborick.com/gsxr1127/gasoline.html para 10.2(1) indicates how
bad a civic's * is. Many car makers ( incl Nissan in Sunny 130Y, Hyundai
in Sonata 2.4, Proton in Waja 1.8 ) save on *, because 99.99% buyers
don't test drive on highways, or know / experienced a difference between
short & long branch *.

My F20A had crude carbon-core cables made by Sumitomo, efficiency
was low ( even by 1990 std ) : longest cable has 12.7k ohm
www.magnecor.com/magnecor1/truth.htm I've changed my F20A's plug
cables 4x, present set ( German cables ) has just 0.2 ohm/ ft : when
warm & w/o load, my F20A can idle @ just 600 rpm, with load then
550 rpm ( without shaking / stalling ). Plug gaps are 2mm. All these are
impossible with crude carbon-core cables. How low can your original
spec engine ( with crude carbon-core cables ) likewise idle @ ?
Carbon can absorb RFI, but cannot conduct as well as metal : high
efficiency cables makers coil metal wires around carbon cores, then use
these coiled wires to conduct : spark size Ø expands from ½ to 3 mm,
10x brighter, colour turns fr deep blue to bright yellow, 5x as loud.( in
open air ).
@ high rpm, any engine with 1 small coil & crude carbon-core cables
will have very small sparks, low torque & loud exhaust noise. This
inadequacy is esp bad in a 2 litre SM4 accord ; combined gear ratio
3.1323 is > those of 2 litre Toyota / Nissan models, e.g. 9.78% >
Nissan Cefiro' s 2.8530 : 75 mph requires 3341.7rpm, but a Cefiro
requires just 3043.7 rpm, on the same 205/65R15 tyres.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CV boots twfsa Honda 2 2 04 Apr 2006 11:35 pm
CV joint boots rev_otis_mcnatt@yahoo.com Honda 3 15 21 Jul 2005 01:18 pm
CV boots Scott Honda 2 9 24 May 2004 06:21 am
Tie rod boots F. Dail Singleton, Jr. Honda 3 0 21 Apr 2004 08:11 pm
When to replace CV Boots Brooklin Honda 2 2 10 Apr 2004 02:18 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.