Honda Car Forum

TeGGeR® wrote:
> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in news:Gp6dnfAkuIKKi-neRVn-
> ug@speakeasy.net:
>
>
>>TeGGeR® wrote:
>>
>>>jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
>>>news:vK6dnVOd1Y8kkOneRVn-jA@speakeasy.net:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>i understand that the primary source of
>>>>moisture in the system is diffusion through the flex hoses
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Diffusion which way? In or out?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>in. if moisture [water] were diffusing out, it would be a self-purging
>>system. brake fluid is strongly hygroscopic.
>>
>
>
>
> The source is the master cylinder, not the hoses. The master cylinder has
> this great big opening on top, capped with a vented rubber chapeau. Air
> enters there, along with whatever moisture it carries.

in terms of surface area to volume ratio, the flex hoses are a bigger
source.

>
> Water is heavier than brake fluid, so it travels downhill, eventually
> ending up in the calipers and wheel cylinders. That's why the black
> corrosion dots are always at the bottom of the bores.
>
> The hoses are quite impermeable, you may believe me on that.

i don't believe you - i'm the materials guy.

for a simple explanation, check

http://www.stoptech.com/tech_info/wp...fluid_1a.shtml

about half way down.

jim beam wrote:
> Al wrote:
>
>> The article at that link was very interesting -
>>
>> Here is what I think I may start doing:
>> At every oil change I will get out the Turkey Baster, suck out the
>> master cylinder reservoir and put in clean brake fluid. By doing this
>> I will regularly reduce the amount of water, eliminate some
>> contamination, and replenish the corrosion inhibitors that may have
>> become depleted. I also will avoid all the the work and pitfalls of
>> bleeding the system, including damage that may or may not be caused by
>> master cylinder piston travel. My system will never be as clean as it
>> would have been right after a complete flush, but it will always be
>> cleaner than it would have been in the second year of a two year
>> cycle. The cost would be minimal.
>
>
> it's an interesting idea and certainly better than doing nothing. not
> sure about the frequency thing, but again, doing it is better than nothing.
>
> what it doesn't achieve is flushing the fluid in the brake calipers and
> the rest of the system.

The other problem is that as you brake, fluid is constantly mixing
around. I did a full flush of my system, and yet soon saw some rust
evident in the master cylinder (got the vehicle used, and it may never
have been fully flushed--the front calipers had quite a bit of rust in
the bore). I probably didn't get evry last bit out of the calipers
during the flush, but my point is that there is a lot of fluid
circulation, and sucking out the master cylinder every 3-4 months
(assuming you're very good about changing your oil) is going to leave a
lot of crud in the rest of the system.

Abe

Abeness wrote:
> jim beam wrote:
>
>> Al wrote:
>>
>>> The article at that link was very interesting -
>>>
>>> Here is what I think I may start doing:
>>> At every oil change I will get out the Turkey Baster, suck out the
>>> master cylinder reservoir and put in clean brake fluid. By doing
>>> this I will regularly reduce the amount of water, eliminate some
>>> contamination, and replenish the corrosion inhibitors that may have
>>> become depleted. I also will avoid all the the work and pitfalls of
>>> bleeding the system, including damage that may or may not be caused
>>> by master cylinder piston travel. My system will never be as clean
>>> as it would have been right after a complete flush, but it will
>>> always be cleaner than it would have been in the second year of a two
>>> year cycle. The cost would be minimal.
>>
>>
>>
>> it's an interesting idea and certainly better than doing nothing. not
>> sure about the frequency thing, but again, doing it is better than
>> nothing.
>>
>> what it doesn't achieve is flushing the fluid in the brake calipers
>> and the rest of the system.
>
>
> The other problem is that as you brake, fluid is constantly mixing
> around. I did a full flush of my system, and yet soon saw some rust
> evident in the master cylinder (got the vehicle used, and it may never
> have been fully flushed--the front calipers had quite a bit of rust in
> the bore). I probably didn't get evry last bit out of the calipers
> during the flush, but my point is that there is a lot of fluid
> circulation, and sucking out the master cylinder every 3-4 months
> (assuming you're very good about changing your oil) is going to leave a
> lot of crud in the rest of the system.
>
> Abe

well, if you want to be really anal about it, take the m/c off, strip it
down and clean it out by hand. it's no less of a task than doing a
caliper. i did the whole system on my 89 when i first got it. only
thing i didn't touch was the proportioning valve.

another tip: if badly crudded up, bleed the master cylinder at the
outlets, DO NOT force dirty fluid the whole way through the system.
this is another reason to do bleeding using the full piston stroke - it
forces all the sludge out rather than let it continue in residence. but
a strip-down would be better.

jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
news:8PednV2gPfTqv-nenZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@speakeasy.net:

> TeGGeR® wrote:

>> The source is the master cylinder, not the hoses. The master cylinder
>> has this great big opening on top, capped with a vented rubber
>> chapeau. Air enters there, along with whatever moisture it carries.
>
> in terms of surface area to volume ratio, the flex hoses are a bigger
> source.
>


Not from what I'm reading.

http://www.gs610.com/abc.htm
Excerpt:
"It depends on the fluid and environment. A typical high performance DOT 4
fluid like, Motul, AP, Castrol SRF, Wilwood and ATE SuperBlue, in a high
humdity evironment will absorb as much as 4.5-5% moisture in as short a
period as 2 weeks. In real world testing (several daily driver cars,
Prospeed GS610™ absorbed <1% moisture in 3 years. This was measured from
the brake fluid in the resevoir where the vehicle's brake system is most
likly to contain the greatest contaimination of moisture."

and see under the paragraph "How does brake fluid become contaminated?".



>>
>> Water is heavier than brake fluid, so it travels downhill, eventually
>> ending up in the calipers and wheel cylinders. That's why the black
>> corrosion dots are always at the bottom of the bores.
>>
>> The hoses are quite impermeable, you may believe me on that.


Not quite...


>
> i don't believe you - i'm the materials guy.



It turns out some of them /do/ absorb water, but not those on Hondas and
other Japanese makes.

My mechanic tells me Honda hoses are made of special rubber that does not
allow fluid intake. He doesn't know what it was called or when they started
using it, but it's probably "EPDM" according to what I'm finding in Google.

Apparently the hose water absorption thing is now largely a thing of the
past.



>
> for a simple explanation, check
>
> http://www.stoptech.com/tech_info/wp...fluid_1a.shtml
>
> about half way down.
>


Yes, but higher up they say:

"The fluid in the system absorbs water through the breathers, through the
caliper piston seals and by magic."

and

"The magic of diffusion allows moisture in the air to permeate microscopic
pores in the rubber brake hoses, the nylon master cylinder reservoir, and
the various rubber seals in the hydraulic system. Sadly, there is nothing
we can do about it and if left unchecked the water would sit in our brake
system and rot it away from the inside out."

So the hoses are only one small part of the absorption. If you count the
hoses for absorption, you have to count EVERYTHING.

Contaminated fresh fluid, and the master cylinder are the main sources.


--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in news:y_CdnfYXWOlYuOneRVn-
pg@speakeasy.net:


> well, if you want to be really anal about it, take the m/c off, strip it
> down and clean it out by hand. it's no less of a task than doing a
> caliper.


That's an excellent idea. Except if you're going to do all that, you might
as well replace the seals, and by that point it's probably easier (and not
much more expensive) to just replace the MC entirely.


> i did the whole system on my 89 when i first got it. only
> thing i didn't touch was the proportioning valve.
>
> another tip: if badly crudded up, bleed the master cylinder at the
> outlets, DO NOT force dirty fluid the whole way through the system.
> this is another reason to do bleeding using the full piston stroke - it
> forces all the sludge out rather than let it continue in residence. but
> a strip-down would be better.


All my brake hydraulic problems disappeared when I started doing annual
fluid changes (with my Integra in '91). Prior to that I had the same
problems everybody else here reports.

It baffles me why more is not made of annual fluid changes, especially when
you consider that your brakes are you last line of defense against crashing
itno things.

It also amazes me that brakes continue to work as well as they do
considering the astonishing level of neglect and abuse they have to endure.


--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

TeGGeR® wrote:
> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
> news:8PednV2gPfTqv-nenZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@speakeasy.net:
>
>
>>TeGGeR® wrote:
>
>
>>>The source is the master cylinder, not the hoses. The master cylinder
>>>has this great big opening on top, capped with a vented rubber
>>>chapeau. Air enters there, along with whatever moisture it carries.
>>
>>in terms of surface area to volume ratio, the flex hoses are a bigger
>>source.
>>
>
>
>
> Not from what I'm reading.
>
> http://www.gs610.com/abc.htm
> Excerpt:
> "It depends on the fluid and environment. A typical high performance DOT 4
> fluid like, Motul, AP, Castrol SRF, Wilwood and ATE SuperBlue, in a high
> humdity evironment will absorb as much as 4.5-5% moisture in as short a
> period as 2 weeks. In real world testing (several daily driver cars,
> Prospeed GS610™ absorbed <1% moisture in 3 years. This was measured from
> the brake fluid in the resevoir where the vehicle's brake system is most
> likly to contain the greatest contaimination of moisture."
>
> and see under the paragraph "How does brake fluid become contaminated?".

er, you want me to regard as authoritative the word of some dude selling
"Prospeed GS610 Maximum Performance Brake Fluid"?

>
>
>
>
>>>Water is heavier than brake fluid, so it travels downhill, eventually
>>>ending up in the calipers and wheel cylinders. That's why the black
>>>corrosion dots are always at the bottom of the bores.
>>>
>>>The hoses are quite impermeable, you may believe me on that.
>
>
>
> Not quite...
>
>
>
>>i don't believe you - i'm the materials guy.
>
>
>
>
> It turns out some of them /do/ absorb water, but not those on Hondas and
> other Japanese makes.

where do you get this stuff??? read some of the material spec sheets!!!
the rate of diffusion is different for different materials, but it
still occurs! and you're not paying attention to surface area/volume
ratio either.

>
> My mechanic tells me Honda hoses are made of special rubber that does not
> allow fluid intake. He doesn't know what it was called or when they started
> using it, but it's probably "EPDM" according to what I'm finding in Google.

so, your mechanic knows more about materials...

>
> Apparently the hose water absorption thing is now largely a thing of the
> past.

fluids are better and hoses are better, but DIFFUSION cannot be eliminated.

>
>
>
>
>>for a simple explanation, check
>>
>>http://www.stoptech.com/tech_info/wp...fluid_1a.shtml
>>
>>about half way down.
>>
>
>
>
> Yes, but higher up they say:
>
> "The fluid in the system absorbs water through the breathers, through the
> caliper piston seals and by magic."

that's dumbed down... and apparently with good cause since "diffusion"
seems to be such a freaky concept.

>
> and
>
> "The magic of diffusion allows moisture in the air to permeate microscopic
> pores in the rubber brake hoses, the nylon master cylinder reservoir, and
> the various rubber seals in the hydraulic system. Sadly, there is nothing
> we can do about it and if left unchecked the water would sit in our brake
> system and rot it away from the inside out."
>
> So the hoses are only one small part of the absorption. If you count the
> hoses for absorption, you have to count EVERYTHING.

yes, you have to count everything, but i say again, do the math on the
surface area of the hoses and figure out how that compares.

>
> Contaminated fresh fluid, and the master cylinder are the main sources.
>
>
whatever.

nothing irritates me more than people that don't know quoting other
people that don't know as if they're authoritative. whatever happened
to reference libraries? has everyone forgotten what text books are for?
what happens if an authoritative reference text is not online?
apparently that means it's invalid.

jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
news:NNmdnfGZosgNLenenZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t:


>
> where do you get this stuff???


Same place you get your pulley bolt info.


--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

TeGGeR® wrote:
> "The magic of diffusion allows moisture in the air to permeate microscopic
> pores in the rubber brake hoses, the nylon master cylinder reservoir, and
> the various rubber seals in the hydraulic system. Sadly, there is nothing
> we can do about it and if left unchecked the water would sit in our brake
> system and rot it away from the inside out."

for the same reason tires slowly lose air through the carcass. FWIW,
costco offers a nitrogen air fill. supposedly, the benefits are:

its dryer than regular air
its molecules are bigger than air molecules, reducing diffusion
less susceptible to expansion/contraction due to temp changes.

if anyone wants to dispute this, go right ahead

TeGGeR® wrote:
> It baffles me why more is not made of annual fluid changes, especially when
> you consider that your brakes are you last line of defense against crashing
> itno things.

because for most people, its just not necessary. i do mine every 3
years, but i dont drive much and live in a semiarid climate. by the time
i do it, it comes out a tad darker (goldish) than the new stuff
(clear/straw colored)

and yes- ive seen my share of coffee-colored brake fluid.
>
> It also amazes me that brakes continue to work as well as they do
> considering the astonishing level of neglect and abuse they have to endure.
>
>

TeGGeR® wrote:
> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
> news:NNmdnfGZosgNLenenZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t:
>
>
>
>>where do you get this stuff???
>
>
>
> Same place you get your pulley bolt info.
>
>
a cheap shot not worthy of response, but you're getting one anyway.

let's examine the established facts:

1. bolts are roughly twice as hard to get off as put on - more than the
5-10% increase in torque anticipated by binding. even after one day of use.

2. the pulley wheel does lash - as evidenced by galling.

3. the greatest anticipated lash impulse is in the tightening direction.

4. honda felt there was sufficient need to change the pulley wheel
design in subsequent years to not just woodruffed, but woodruffed,
splined *and* loctited.

5. bolts are known to tighten in service depending on application.

what is not established is:

1. the extent to which any tightening rotation may occurr, if it does.

2. what else could account for a 100% increase in bolt torque in the
absence of serious corrosion.

saying "i don't believe it therefore it can't be true" really doesn't
cut it.