Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 15 Aug 2005, 02:29 pm
Jerzy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Poor gas mileage (2005 Honda Civic LX AT) ~25 MPG

According to spec the gas consumption is 29 in the city and 38 on the
highway. However, I can drive about 300 MI before the "low fuel" light
comes up (which according to the manual would allow me to drive
additional 25/30 miles). Most of the time (90%) I drive on a highway.
According to the spec the tank size is 13.2 gallons, which gives me
about 25 MPG: 300 + (30 reserve) / 13.2 = 25. This average is even
worst than officially published 29 MPG in the city. What gives? Can the
fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If
there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is
probably around 75 mph). How good are these advertised 29/38 numbers?
Are they accurate when driving 55/65? Can't test that myself since I
don't have a patience to drive that slow. This is a new car - I've just
bought it (I put almost 3k MI already). Thanks.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15 Aug 2005, 04:11 pm
Timothy J. Lee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poor gas mileage (2005 Honda Civic LX AT) ~25 MPG

In article <1124134181.111170.83690@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups. com>,
Jerzy <javaguy1974@hotmail.com> wrote:
>According to spec the gas consumption is 29 in the city and 38 on the
>highway. However, I can drive about 300 MI before the "low fuel" light
>comes up (which according to the manual would allow me to drive
>additional 25/30 miles). Most of the time (90%) I drive on a highway.
>According to the spec the tank size is 13.2 gallons, which gives me
>about 25 MPG: 300 + (30 reserve) / 13.2 = 25.


Instead of assuming how much fuel is in the fuel tank when the light
turns on, go to the fuel station and refuel until the fuel tank is
full. Note the amount of fuel used in refueling and divide that number
into the number of miles since you last filled the fuel tank to full.
That will give you a more accurate estimate.

>Can the
>fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If
>there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is
>probably around 75 mph).


On the highway, aerodynamic drag increases greatly as you increase speed.
That can greatly worsen fuel economy.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Lee
Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome.
No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 15 Aug 2005, 04:37 pm
Jerzy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poor gas mileage (2005 Honda Civic LX AT) ~25 MPG

>That will give you a more accurate estimate.

OK. Sounds like a good idea. Thanks.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 15 Aug 2005, 05:50 pm
chibitul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poor gas mileage (2005 Honda Civic LX AT) ~25 MPG

keep an excel spreadsheet with date, mileage, fuel, price, mileage (per
tank), average mileage (last 5 tanks or so, up to you) and also
MAINTENANCE recoards: new tires, new plugs, new brake pads, whatever,
so that you know is something goes wrong. also note driving conditions:
summer, highway, empty car, or winter, hilly, 4 people in the car and
the trunck loaded with sports equipment. That also affects the mileage
a lot!

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 15 Aug 2005, 10:48 pm
SoCalMike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poor gas mileage (2005 Honda Civic LX AT) ~25 MPG

Jerzy wrote:
> According to spec the gas consumption is 29 in the city and 38 on the
> highway. However, I can drive about 300 MI before the "low fuel" light
> comes up (which according to the manual would allow me to drive
> additional 25/30 miles).


which means basically... nothing. it might, might not. its basically a
"second warning"

> Most of the time (90%) I drive on a highway.
> According to the spec the tank size is 13.2 gallons, which gives me
> about 25 MPG: 300 + (30 reserve) / 13.2 = 25. This average is even


set trip odo to 0
fill tank
drive until you feel the tank should be refilled
refill tank until pump clicks
divide number on trip odometer by number of gallons used to refill
*thats* your true MPG

IOW... dont go by the tank specs and what youre guessing the reserve
should be... use REAL FIGURES.

> worst than officially published 29 MPG in the city. What gives? Can the
> fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If
> there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is
> probably around 75 mph). How good are these advertised 29/38 numbers?


they pretty much dont apply for 90mph driving. in fact, they only apply
if you do the same test cycle the EPA uses. you should get around 29 in
mixed driving. if youre doing 90mph, then 25 is a reasonable number.

> Are they accurate when driving 55/65? Can't test that myself since I
> don't have a patience to drive that slow. This is a new car - I've just
> bought it (I put almost 3k MI already). Thanks.


it should loosen up more in another 5k miles.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 16 Aug 2005, 11:04 am
Andy Mai
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poor gas mileage (2005 Honda Civic LX AT) ~25 MPG

SoCalMike <mikein562athotmail@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Jerzy wrote:
>> worst than officially published 29 MPG in the city. What gives? Can the
>> fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If
>> there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is
>> probably around 75 mph). How good are these advertised 29/38 numbers?

>
>they pretty much dont apply for 90mph driving. in fact, they only apply
>if you do the same test cycle the EPA uses. you should get around 29 in
>mixed driving. if youre doing 90mph, then 25 is a reasonable number.


The EPA test for highway mileage is to run the car on friction rollers
at a constant 48 mph.

Running down the road at 80-90 mph should give you about 30 mpg,
more or less, depending on the direction and speed of the wind and
the severity of the hills. (No road is absolutely flat.)

One time I was driving my '98 Civic EX coupe from Flagstaff, AZ to
Amarillo, TX on I-40 at a constant 85 mph indicated. I got 42 mpg
over 411 miles. I also had a constant 40 mph tail wind. It makes a
huge difference.

Andy
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 16 Aug 2005, 12:48 pm
slim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poor gas mileage (2005 Honda Civic LX AT) ~25 MPG



Jerzy wrote:
>
> According to spec the gas consumption is 29 in the city and 38 on the
> highway. However, I can drive about 300 MI before the "low fuel" light
> comes up (which according to the manual would allow me to drive
> additional 25/30 miles). Most of the time (90%) I drive on a highway.
> According to the spec the tank size is 13.2 gallons, which gives me
> about 25 MPG: 300 + (30 reserve) / 13.2 = 25. This average is even
> worst than officially published 29 MPG in the city. What gives? Can the
> fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If
> there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is
> probably around 75 mph). How good are these advertised 29/38 numbers?
> Are they accurate when driving 55/65? Can't test that myself since I
> don't have a patience to drive that slow. This is a new car - I've just
> bought it (I put almost 3k MI already). Thanks.


I get 34 mpg @ 80+ on my 96 Civic Coupe. ;-)

--

Why Bill Gates is a crimimal.

Microsoft helps China to censor bloggers
Jonathan Watts in Beijing
Wednesday June 15, 2005 The Guardian

Civil liberties groups have condemned an arrangement between Microsoft
and
Chinese authorities to censor the internet.

The American company is helping censors remove "freedom" and "democracy"
from the net in China with a software package that prevents bloggers
from
using these and other politically sensitive words on their websites.

The restrictions, which also include an automated denial of "human
rights",
are built into MSN Spaces, a blog service launched in China last month
by
Shanghai MSN Network Communications Technology, a venture in which
Microsoft
holds a 50% stake.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 17 Aug 2005, 01:21 pm
Alex Rodriguez
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poor gas mileage (2005 Honda Civic LX AT) ~25 MPG

In article <1124134181.111170.83690@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups. com>,
javaguy1974@hotmail.com says...
>
>
>According to spec the gas consumption is 29 in the city and 38 on the
>highway. However, I can drive about 300 MI before the "low fuel" light
>comes up (which according to the manual would allow me to drive
>additional 25/30 miles). Most of the time (90%) I drive on a highway.
>According to the spec the tank size is 13.2 gallons, which gives me
>about 25 MPG: 300 + (30 reserve) / 13.2 = 25. This average is even
>worst than officially published 29 MPG in the city. What gives? Can the
>fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If
>there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is
>probably around 75 mph). How good are these advertised 29/38 numbers?
>Are they accurate when driving 55/65? Can't test that myself since I
>don't have a patience to drive that slow. This is a new car - I've just
>bought it (I put almost 3k MI already). Thanks.


Something is wrong. I have a T&C minivan and in highway only driving I
get just over 24mpg. I average about somewhere between 70 & 75 mph, so I am
not driving really slow.
------------
Alex

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 20 Aug 2005, 10:36 am
SAC 441
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poor gas mileage (2005 Honda Civic LX AT) ~25 MPG

Just a point of reference: I have a 2003 Honda Civic EX,and I routinely
do 80mph on the interstate.I get 29mpg when going that fast.I tend to
get better mileage when approaching lower speeds (like 55-60mph) when
going on state roads with lower speed limits.I think this is a general
observation in any engine no matter what year or engine in the
vehicle.The faster you go,the more the fuel efficiency decreases.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 21 Aug 2005, 08:53 am
TomP
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poor gas mileage (2005 Honda Civic LX AT) ~25 MPG

Jerzy wrote:

> According to spec the gas consumption is 29 in the city and 38 on the
> highway. However, I can drive about 300 MI before the "low fuel" light
> comes up (which according to the manual would allow me to drive
> additional 25/30 miles). Most of the time (90%) I drive on a highway.
> According to the spec the tank size is 13.2 gallons, which gives me
> about 25 MPG: 300 + (30 reserve) / 13.2 = 25. This average is even
> worst than officially published 29 MPG in the city. What gives? Can the
> fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If
> there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is
> probably around 75 mph). How good are these advertised 29/38 numbers?
> Are they accurate when driving 55/65? Can't test that myself since I
> don't have a patience to drive that slow. This is a new car - I've just
> bought it (I put almost 3k MI already). Thanks.


My son's '05 Civic Coupe (A/T) consistently gets 25 MPG, strictly in town
(greater Los Angeles area) driving. When the car does see the freeway
(such as it is around here) the F.E. can get close to 30 MPG

You can read about EPA ESTIMATES on their web site, but here is Honda's
version:

Tech Line fields many questions on fuel economy, including why some
vehicles don't get the fuel mileage estimates shown on the fuel economy
label (part of the Monroney label that's on every new car and truck).
Before you read this Q & A, here's a sample label with an explanation of
its contents.

Question: Why can't I get the City and Highway mpg estimates shown on the
label?

Answer: The mileage estimates on the label reflect the average mpg attained
by similar vehicles in a model line under controlled laboratory conditions
and are not the result of an actual road test. And remember, as stated on
the fuel economy label: "Actual mileage will vary with options, driving
conditions, driving habits, and vehicle's condition."

Question: Just how are the EPA mileage estimates made anyway?

Answer: Test vehicles are run by professional drivers on a treadmill-like
device that easures exhaust emissions and fuel usage. During the test, the
vehicle's headlights, A/C, heater, audio unit, and all accessories are
turned off. Upshifts on M/T vehicles are typically made at 15 mph (1st to
2nd gear), 28 mph
(2nd to 3rd gear), 41 mph (3rd to 4th gear), and 52 mph (4th to 5th gear).
The City portion of the test simulates a 7.5 mile stop-and-go trip with an
average speed of 20 mph. The trip takes 23 minutes, has 18 stops, and keeps
the engine idling about 18 percent of the time to simulate rush hour
traffic delays.
The Highway portion of the test simulates a 10-mile drive with speeds
averaging 48 mph. It's
run from a hot start in a mix of rural and interstate driving conditions.
There are no stops, and there's not much idling time. When both test
results are known, the City mpg is lowered by 10 percent, and the
Highway mpg is lowered by 22 percent; this makes the results closer to
real worldls fuel consumption.

Question: How do I calculate mpg?

Answer: You divide the miles driven by the number of gallons of fuel that
you
used.

Question: How can I increase my vehicle's mpg?

Answer: To increase your vehicle's mpg, do this:
.. As often as possible, accelerate slowly and smoothly, keep your engine
speed below 3,000
rpm, and lower your road speed.
.. Keep your tires inflated to the specs listed on the doorjamb sticker.
.. Keep your vehicle in top condition by following the maintainance schedule

listed in your owner's manual and by using the recommended engine oil.

Question: Where can I get more info on fuel economy?

Answer: You can get a free copy of the Model Year 2001 Fuel Economy Guide
by any of these
means:
Mail: National Alternative Fuels Hotline
9300 Lee Highway
Fairfax, VA 22031-1207
Phone: 800-423-1363
Internet: www.fueleconomy.gov









--
Tp,

-------- __o
----- -\<. -------- __o
--- ( )/ ( ) ---- -\<.
-------------------- ( )/ ( )
-----------------------------------------

No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron...


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2000 civic poor gas mileage elaine1231@yahoo.com Honda 2 8 09 Feb 2007 09:29 pm
Accord 05 VP Poor Gas Mileage ag_15@excite.com Honda 3 21 08 Apr 2006 08:24 am
2005 Honda Civic LX gas mileage cinerama Honda 3 37 01 Dec 2005 03:02 pm
Poor Mileage on 2004 Civic Bob Honda 2 4 15 Mar 2005 10:39 am
2004 Honda Civic Hybrid: poor gas mileage roger beniot Honda 3 38 17 Feb 2004 01:33 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.