Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
> >
>> there is no average. the variables of location, driving style & typical >> journey are just too broad to generalize. > > Of course there's an average, and of course it could be helpful to know. > > The distribution probably is Gaussian. > > Unless one knows the standard deviation of the average is extremely high, > then the variables you name are no more too broad to generalize than, say, > adult male height. Even if the S.D. is extremely high, the original poster > could seek averages for simply his locale (and for OEM pads), and this > would > reduce the S.D. and no doubt provide useful information to him. > I agree. Also, you could calculate several averages if you had the data. An average for urban driving, an average for highway driving, an average for suburban driving, an average for little old ladies, etc. I have a 99 Accord with 4 wheel disc brakes that just turned over 70k with the original brakes. I bought replacement pads a couple years ago but still have not needed to put them on. Sid |
|
|||
|
> I have a 98 Accord MT. 106K. Front pads still have 20% left, all original.
> I do not downshift to brake, but often stay in a lower gear, and thus do > not brake nearly as much as autos I follow. > > My 87 Accord's front pads usually only lasted 50K. Thanks, now this is what I consider useful information, unlike some of the other "smart" answers. |
|
|||
|
"chibitul" <chibitul@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:1122752401.268880.4120@g43g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com... >> I have a 98 Accord MT. 106K. Front pads still have 20% left, all >> original. >> I do not downshift to brake, but often stay in a lower gear, and thus do >> not brake nearly as much as autos I follow. >> >> My 87 Accord's front pads usually only lasted 50K. > > Thanks, now this is what I consider useful information, unlike some of > the other "smart" answers. Uh-huh. So how long do brake pads last, based on that data? |
|
|||
|
chibitul wrote: > > well, smart guy, I asked what is the average. Imagine it is some soft > of Gaussian distribution, or whatever, and yes, some brakes wear out > faster (100 miles), some wear out very late (200k miles) as you said. > but these are UNUSUAL cases, 1 in a million or so. I wanted to know the > AVERAGE. If that concept is familiar to you, please let me know. > > thanks > p.s. I am going to check tha pads tomorrow. I get 35K on OEM Honda pads on a 96 Civic coupe. -- "I'm the commander -- see, I don't need to explain -- I do not need to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being the president. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel like I owe anybody an explanation. " - George "Dubya" Bush |
|
|||
|
it depends on how you drive car. There is a way to keep lasting a break
pad. A soft driver usually keep their pad last while the violent drivers does opposite. It is not based on luck or sitution or type or condition of car. It is based on pure driving skill... |
|
|||
|
based on this answer (and other information I found searching older
threads) I would say the "average" lifetime of Honda pads is between 50k and 100k miles. Of course it depends on too many factors to list here. But here are a couple of point I learned: 1 -50k miles is not unusual, that is for typical driving conditions. if you do pizza delivery of course the pads will wear down faster, and if you do only highway of course they may well last over 100k miles. 2 -usually you do not have to turn the rotors, they last almost 200k miles if you use OEM pads and do not let the pads wear down to the metal. I check my pads and I have 2.1-2.2 mm left, that is at 59k miles. that is just in line with what others experienced. you give me more data for your specific case (auto/manual, citi/highway, aggressive/moderate drivers, hilly/flat region, etc.) and I will give you an even better *estimate* remember, it is just an *estimate*. |
|
|||
|
chibitul <chibitul@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> remember, it is just an *estimate*. I don't think there is an estimate for brake wear. There are just too many factors. You might get an average and that's about it. The only way to find out if the pads needed replacing are from regular inspections or hearing the tell-tale noise. |
|
|||
|
In article <qsHGe.6329$0C.1674@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.n et>,
elle_navorski@nospam.earthlink.net says... >Of course there's an average, and of course it could be helpful to know. I think it would hurt more than help. There is such a wide range of pad life that you could think you are average, when you are really below average and you ruined your rotors. --------------- Alex |
|
|||
|
If you're willing to work the standard tranny, they'll last a very long
time. Quality of rotor and pads will play a big factor (along with driving style) on the wear factor. I tend to drive hard, but don't use the brake much (I prefer to downshift or swing around the obstical). Anyways, my 1998 Civic is on it's 4th set of pad up front and the rear drum are still on the orginal shoes. The car has 246,000km and the clutch is still orginal. I'm do for a new clutch in the near future, but since the bad presure plate and stiff clutch pedal doesn't bother me, I'm probaly gonna milk it for a few more season. Pars 98 Civic Hatch "chibitul" <chibitul@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:1122603600.267210.3850@g49g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com... > I feel like I'm stirring the pot a little bit. I know this is a tough > question... anyway, for a manual car, driving in the suburbs (not New > York like traffic jam, but also not interstate highway all day long), > you know, the usual 5-10 miles to work every day, groceries, gym, > shopping, doctor, etc. so how long so the brake pads last, ON AVERAGE? > just throw some numbers. I mean, 1000 miles would probably be unheard > of, right? also, 200k miles would also be unheard of (remember, this is > mostly suburbs, not highway). I'm asking because I peeked at my pads > and there is some thickness left, need to get the caliper and measure > properly over the weekend. I am approaching 60k miles. > > thanks > |
|
|||
|
Too variable due to driving style. My wife and I both had '90 Integras
years ago. She drove hers like a bat out of Hell and it needed 2 replacements on the front (one on the rear also, I think) before she sold it at 89,000 miles. Mine made it 105,000 before needing front pads, and the original rears lasted until it was sold at 119,000. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Brake Pads | johnin | Honda 2 | 1 | 23 May 2006 03:50 am |
| Re: Brake Pads | johnin | Honda 2 | 2 | 15 May 2006 11:16 pm |
| Brake Pads | mrg | Honda 2 | 4 | 15 May 2006 11:14 pm |
| Best Brake Pads | news group | Acura | 3 | 24 Jul 2004 10:40 pm |
| honda brake pads(disc brakes) vs. other premium pads | Stempis Rhubank | Honda 3 | 10 | 26 Oct 2003 09:38 pm |