Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 20 May 2005, 07:59 pm
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brake Specs: 99 Civic LX

For a 99 Civic LX 4-door sedan, can someone please post the specs for --

-- rotor thickness
-- brake pad thickness
-- drum shoe thickness, if it uses drums in the rear

I have a friend with this car who gets vibrations in the steering wheel when
she brakes. Anything else you'd check right now?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 20 May 2005, 09:17 pm
TeGGeR®
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Brake Specs: 99 Civic LX

"Elle" <elle_navorski@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in
news:GJvje.4074$Lc1.3696@newsread3.news.pas.earthl ink.net:

> For a 99 Civic LX 4-door sedan, can someone please post the specs for
> --
>
> -- rotor thickness
> -- brake pad thickness
> -- drum shoe thickness, if it uses drums in the rear
>
> I have a friend with this car who gets vibrations in the steering
> wheel when she brakes. Anything else you'd check right now?
>



Other than rotor runout due to actual warpage...

http://www.babcox.com/editorial/bf/bf100326.htm

Make certain that
1) All glaze deposits have been sanded off the rotor
2) All rust has been sanded off the hub and rear of the rotor's "top hat".

http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/rotor_off.jpg
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/glaze.jpg
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/glaze-off.jpg

Glaze makes "hard spots" that differ in friction properties from the
unglazed portions of the disc. Glaze is simply pad material that has
embedded itself into the surface texture of the disc. The pads will
regularly grab more or less depending on what they are travelling on, and
this will be felt as vibration. A wire wheel or lots of work with 50-grit
emery cloth will fix that.

If there is any sort of rust, or any particles on the flange or the back of
the rotor, the rotor will sit crooked on the hub, and runout will be
excessive, and this will be felt as vibration.

Once you are past that, then you need to read the Babcox article **very**
carefully.

Don't let anyone tell you overtorqued wheel nuts have caused this. On
Hondas this is simply *not* true unless there are other factors at play,
such as flange rust.

Another factor is tires. When you brake, the front tires are pressed into
the pavement more firmly than if you are just cruising. If the tires are
cupped or otherwise unevenly worn, this can show up most when they are
pressed harder (or lighter!) into the pavement. Of course, odd tire wear
leads us directly to the possibility of suspension wear...

Check the brakes first.


--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 21 May 2005, 08:27 pm
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Brake Specs: 99 Civic LX

Thanks, Tegger. Update: My friend's car was due for an oil change and so she
decided to let the dealer do it today and also check out the brakes. She
said the rotors just needed an "adjustment."

Not sure what that means, or whether she had the wording right (though I
mentioned rotor warping to her as a possibility before all this, so she was
attuned to something possibly being wrong with them) but I gather it may
simply have consisted of cleaning off the rotors.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 22 May 2005, 12:22 am
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Brake Specs: 99 Civic LX

TeGGeR® wrote:
> "Elle" <elle_navorski@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in
> news:GJvje.4074$Lc1.3696@newsread3.news.pas.earthl ink.net:
>
>
>>For a 99 Civic LX 4-door sedan, can someone please post the specs for
>>--
>>
>>-- rotor thickness
>>-- brake pad thickness
>>-- drum shoe thickness, if it uses drums in the rear
>>
>>I have a friend with this car who gets vibrations in the steering
>>wheel when she brakes. Anything else you'd check right now?
>>

>
>
>
> Other than rotor runout due to actual warpage...
>
> http://www.babcox.com/editorial/bf/bf100326.htm
>
> Make certain that
> 1) All glaze deposits have been sanded off the rotor
> 2) All rust has been sanded off the hub and rear of the rotor's "top hat".
>
> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/rotor_off.jpg
> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/glaze.jpg
> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/glaze-off.jpg
>
> Glaze makes "hard spots" that differ in friction properties from the
> unglazed portions of the disc. Glaze is simply pad material that has
> embedded itself into the surface texture of the disc. The pads will
> regularly grab more or less depending on what they are travelling on, and
> this will be felt as vibration. A wire wheel or lots of work with 50-grit
> emery cloth will fix that.
>
> If there is any sort of rust, or any particles on the flange or the back of
> the rotor, the rotor will sit crooked on the hub, and runout will be
> excessive, and this will be felt as vibration.
>
> Once you are past that, then you need to read the Babcox article **very**
> carefully.
>
> Don't let anyone tell you overtorqued wheel nuts have caused this. On
> Hondas this is simply *not* true unless there are other factors at play,
> such as flange rust.


the babcox article /does/ mention torque as a factor in causing runout -
it's the 4th point after the first paragraph on that subject.

>
> Another factor is tires. When you brake, the front tires are pressed into
> the pavement more firmly than if you are just cruising. If the tires are
> cupped or otherwise unevenly worn, this can show up most when they are
> pressed harder (or lighter!) into the pavement. Of course, odd tire wear
> leads us directly to the possibility of suspension wear...
>
> Check the brakes first.
>
>

all you say is great advice, but i believe the babcox article is
deficient in that is does not acknowledge the important fact that in a
runout situation, [ie. where the disk is wavering fron side to side]
there is a momentum effect. a single piston caliper has a significant
mass & therefore momentum differential between the piston side & the
caliper side. the piston is light & can follow the disk runout much
more easily than the heavier caliper, no matter how easily that caliper
may be able to slide. for low speed runout, the effect will be small or
indeed negligable, but at higher speed, the caliper will always be
playing "catch up" to the piston because of its higher mass and will
therefore create a pressure differential in the hydraulics, which will
in turn be felt at the pedal.

in a fixed caliper, with opposing pistons, provided both pistons are
equally free to float, the there will be no pulsing under runout because
the momentum of both pistons is the same. maybe carryng this
assumption from fixed calipers to single piston calipers is the cause of
this omission.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 22 May 2005, 08:10 am
TeGGeR®
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Brake Specs: 99 Civic LX

jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
news:wfednQk-G--qig3fRVn-qA@speakeasy.net:


>>

> all you say is great advice, but i believe the babcox article is
> deficient in that is does not acknowledge the important fact that in a
> runout situation, [ie. where the disk is wavering fron side to side]
> there is a momentum effect. a single piston caliper has a significant
> mass & therefore momentum differential between the piston side & the
> caliper side. the piston is light & can follow the disk runout much
> more easily than the heavier caliper, no matter how easily that
> caliper may be able to slide.




Since the caliper cannot move more quickly than the piston, the piston is
eventually kicked back into the caliper as the rotor strikes the pad on the
piston. The caliper/pad assembly therefore eventually floats free of the
rotor anyway, same as the fixed caliper type.

If the caliper or pads are frozen in place and cannot slide correctly, then
the effects are a bit different.



--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 22 May 2005, 08:32 am
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Brake Specs: 99 Civic LX

TeGGeR® wrote:
> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
> news:wfednQk-G--qig3fRVn-qA@speakeasy.net:
>
>
>
>>all you say is great advice, but i believe the babcox article is
>>deficient in that is does not acknowledge the important fact that in a
>>runout situation, [ie. where the disk is wavering fron side to side]
>>there is a momentum effect. a single piston caliper has a significant
>>mass & therefore momentum differential between the piston side & the
>>caliper side. the piston is light & can follow the disk runout much
>>more easily than the heavier caliper, no matter how easily that
>>caliper may be able to slide.

>
>
>
>
> Since the caliper cannot move more quickly than the piston, the piston is
> eventually kicked back into the caliper as the rotor strikes the pad on the
> piston.


right, momentum.

> The caliper/pad assembly therefore eventually floats free of the
> rotor anyway, same as the fixed caliper type.


yes, but there's a time delay, and that's where the hydraulics
experience a pressure pulse.

>
> If the caliper or pads are frozen in place and cannot slide correctly, then
> the effects are a bit different.


for single piston, if the caliper's not free to slide, the effects are
more pronounced & happen at lower speeds, but the net effect is the
same, the piston being forced in & out of the caliper causing the pulsing.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 22 May 2005, 04:56 pm
TeGGeR®
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Brake Specs: 99 Civic LX

jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
news:YoWdndVEho9hFA3fRVn-2A@speakeasy.net:

> TeGGeR® wrote:


>
>>
>> If the caliper or pads are frozen in place and cannot slide
>> correctly, then the effects are a bit different.

>
> for single piston, if the caliper's not free to slide, the effects are
> more pronounced & happen at lower speeds, but the net effect is the
> same, the piston being forced in & out of the caliper causing the
> pulsing.
>
>



I see your point. I suppose Babcox could have emphasized that more, but
then how many other things could they have emphasized?

Regardless of that, the Babcox article deals with the causes of pulsation
complaints, not specifically with the effects of those causes.

The main premise of the Babcox article (as I gather it) is that it is too
common for pulsation complaints to be incorrectly identified as "warped
rotors", and for the "warpage" to be wrongly identifed as actual distortion
of the friction faces. They are saying that you need to investigate several
other significant causes of pulsation before pinning the blame on distorted
friction surfaces.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 22 May 2005, 06:39 pm
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Brake Specs: 99 Civic LX

TeGGeR® wrote:
> jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote in
> news:YoWdndVEho9hFA3fRVn-2A@speakeasy.net:
>
>
>>TeGGeR® wrote:

>
>
>>>If the caliper or pads are frozen in place and cannot slide
>>>correctly, then the effects are a bit different.

>>
>>for single piston, if the caliper's not free to slide, the effects are
>>more pronounced & happen at lower speeds, but the net effect is the
>>same, the piston being forced in & out of the caliper causing the
>>pulsing.
>>
>>

>
>
>
> I see your point. I suppose Babcox could have emphasized that more, but
> then how many other things could they have emphasized?


indeed!

>
> Regardless of that, the Babcox article deals with the causes of pulsation
> complaints, not specifically with the effects of those causes.


yep. i've seen disks be worse after being skimmed than they were
before, so the babcox article is great in that it encourages people to
not assume it's the disk every time.

>
> The main premise of the Babcox article (as I gather it) is that it is too
> common for pulsation complaints to be incorrectly identified as "warped
> rotors", and for the "warpage" to be wrongly identifed as actual distortion
> of the friction faces. They are saying that you need to investigate several
> other significant causes of pulsation before pinning the blame on distorted
> friction surfaces.
>

and that's why it's a good article. they just need to update the single
piston caliper theory a bit, that's all.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sites with specs? PCB Honda 2 2 09 Apr 2007 10:41 pm
Civic valve specs? EW Honda 2 1 20 Nov 2005 03:27 pm
rim and tire specs for RSX MagPi Acura 2 01 Nov 2005 02:40 pm
2004 Civic Wheel Specs. Skid Honda 3 0 15 Apr 2004 07:46 pm
Civic 1.3GL carb engine specs CK@@L Honda 3 2 18 Dec 2003 10:37 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.