Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 19 Apr 2005, 06:34 pm
George Macdonald
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Shock/strut life for a 96 Civic Coupe

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 06:14:00 -0700, jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote:

>George Macdonald wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:56:59 -0700, jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>George Macdonald wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 07:45:58 -0400, Imminent Vengeance <me@privacy.net>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>George Macdonald wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Depends where you live but that suspension system is prone to broken front
>>>>>>springs in the frost belt - the spring breaks just where it enters the
>>>>>>perch on the shock. Because of where the break is, you probably won't even
>>>>>>notice any difference in ride/handling but you might hear a "doink" when
>>>>>>you get out of the car on the side with the break; you'd definitely hear
>>>>>>the "doink... doink" when you jack the front up. The break *can* put some
>>>>>>side force on the shock which will wear it out quicker.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The only time I broke a spring on my '93 Accord, it was at the other end of
>>>>>the coil, at the top where it enters the strut mount. But I think this was
>>>>>the result of that corner of the car jumping a huge curb while swerving to
>>>>>avoid a bad driver.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The break often happens on a violent bump but the root cause is usually
>>>>weakening of the metal due to corrosion where water/salt gets through a
>>>>hole in the epoxy coating of the spring. The upper spring seat has a
>>>>rubber doughnut in it so there's no wear of the epoxy there. I've heard of
>>>>the upper end going but AFAIK the lower is more common because of epoxy
>>>>wearing away where it contacts the metal of the perch. If you live in a
>>>>"corrosion area" it's worth checking springs for nicks in the epoxy...
>>>>which *can* be caused by some of the (cruder) tools used to compress the
>>>>spring, e.g. when swapping shocks.
>>>>
>>>
>>>i've seen brand new springs with such nicks. bad [neglectful] handling
>>>handling at the factory. as you say, corrosion pitting starts & that
>>>causes a stress riser that initiates fatigue. it's the fatigue cracking
>>>that kills the spring.

>>
>>
>> Funny thing is I've always thought that spring metal can easily be made
>> fairly corrosion resistant.

>
>sure, there's all kinds of non-ferrous springs, but they're fiercely
>expensive. i know honda springs don't seem "cheap", but believe me,
>they are compared to the alternatives. also bear in mind that steel is
>relatively high modulus compared to other materials and silicon/carbon
>steel typically used in auto springs has a very high yield point
>compared to most fatigue resistant stainless steels. lastly, spring
>wire has to be comparatively soft for the forming phase, then heat
>treatable to become hard and resistant to yielding. stainless steels
>exist that have these kinds of hardening reactions, but they're a big
>step up in cost.


I wasn't talking about stainless or non-ferrous - there are alloys of of
"steel" which corrode much more slowly than others. This is a problem
which, while not unique to Honda, is a rather glaring one... not to mention
that the epoxy coating seems like a bad idea, given the evidence.

>> If Honda thinks they can skip that because of
>> the epoxy coating, somebody there is dreaming. The Lyle tool I used to
>> replace my springs really did a number on the brand new spring coating -
>> tried to patch with epoxy glue and hoping it'll hold for a bit.
>>

>just rust resistant paint works fine. trouble is, once you have some
>corrosion, you have pitting & therefore potential fatigue crack
>initiation. strictly speaking, springs in that condition should be
>replaced, but i can't say i'm a strict adherant to that rule. depends
>on mileage & condition.


Did you miss something here? This was a brand new spring which was marred
by the tool - no question of corrosion having started.

>interesting you mention the lisle tool. i was extremely unimpressed
>with the principle of that device, for the reasons you're describing
>happened. i therefore built my own - does not touch the spring at all!
> i'll email a photo to tegger.


I chose it because it *looks* safer than some others, since the loops
cannot break loose from the spring coils under load. I found on use that
the screws "machine" a "thread" into the collars, thus reducing their
effective thickness - IOW safety may not be what it appears.

--
Rgds, George Macdonald
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 19 Apr 2005, 06:34 pm
George Macdonald
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Shock/strut life for a 96 Civic Coupe

On 19 Apr 2005 12:55:43 GMT, "TeGGer®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote:

>George Macdonald <fammacd=!SPAM^nothanks@tellurian.com> wrote in
>news:evp561ts07tcmjkecn7at6src6idb5cu9t@4ax.com :
>
>
>> The break often happens on a violent bump but the root cause is
>> usually weakening of the metal due to corrosion where water/salt gets
>> through a hole in the epoxy coating of the spring. The upper spring
>> seat has a rubber doughnut in it so there's no wear of the epoxy
>> there. I've heard of the upper end going

>
>
>
>That's where mine broke.
>
>And mine were silent; no *doink* noise. Never even knew until I checked
>than at the next brake service.
>
>It's funny, but the replacement springs now have more miles and years on
>them than the originals that broke. I wonder if Honda fixed a quality
>problem somewhere...


It's possible that you had one of the nicks mentioned by Jim Beam in the
epoxy.

--
Rgds, George Macdonald
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 19 Apr 2005, 09:14 pm
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Shock/strut life for a 96 Civic Coupe

George Macdonald wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 06:14:00 -0700, jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>
>>George Macdonald wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:56:59 -0700, jim beam <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>George Macdonald wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 07:45:58 -0400, Imminent Vengeance <me@privacy.net>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>George Macdonald wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Depends where you live but that suspension system is prone to broken front
>>>>>>>springs in the frost belt - the spring breaks just where it enters the
>>>>>>>perch on the shock. Because of where the break is, you probably won't even
>>>>>>>notice any difference in ride/handling but you might hear a "doink" when
>>>>>>>you get out of the car on the side with the break; you'd definitely hear
>>>>>>>the "doink... doink" when you jack the front up. The break *can* put some
>>>>>>>side force on the shock which will wear it out quicker.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The only time I broke a spring on my '93 Accord, it was at the other end of
>>>>>>the coil, at the top where it enters the strut mount. But I think this was
>>>>>>the result of that corner of the car jumping a huge curb while swerving to
>>>>>>avoid a bad driver.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The break often happens on a violent bump but the root cause is usually
>>>>>weakening of the metal due to corrosion where water/salt gets through a
>>>>>hole in the epoxy coating of the spring. The upper spring seat has a
>>>>>rubber doughnut in it so there's no wear of the epoxy there. I've heard of
>>>>>the upper end going but AFAIK the lower is more common because of epoxy
>>>>>wearing away where it contacts the metal of the perch. If you live in a
>>>>>"corrosion area" it's worth checking springs for nicks in the epoxy...
>>>>>which *can* be caused by some of the (cruder) tools used to compress the
>>>>>spring, e.g. when swapping shocks.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>i've seen brand new springs with such nicks. bad [neglectful] handling
>>>>handling at the factory. as you say, corrosion pitting starts & that
>>>>causes a stress riser that initiates fatigue. it's the fatigue cracking
>>>>that kills the spring.
>>>
>>>
>>>Funny thing is I've always thought that spring metal can easily be made
>>>fairly corrosion resistant.

>>
>>sure, there's all kinds of non-ferrous springs, but they're fiercely
>>expensive. i know honda springs don't seem "cheap", but believe me,
>>they are compared to the alternatives. also bear in mind that steel is
>>relatively high modulus compared to other materials and silicon/carbon
>>steel typically used in auto springs has a very high yield point
>>compared to most fatigue resistant stainless steels. lastly, spring
>>wire has to be comparatively soft for the forming phase, then heat
>>treatable to become hard and resistant to yielding. stainless steels
>>exist that have these kinds of hardening reactions, but they're a big
>>step up in cost.

>
>
> I wasn't talking about stainless or non-ferrous - there are alloys of of
> "steel" which corrode much more slowly than others. This is a problem
> which, while not unique to Honda, is a rather glaring one...


well sure, there are /many/ aloys of steel, but the key one in this
application is the ability to heat treat to something with a very high
yield point, yet not be brittle

> not to mention
> that the epoxy coating seems like a bad idea, given the evidence.


that definitely could do with some work. honda don't actually make
springs - they buy them in. find out who the supplier is.

>
>
>>> If Honda thinks they can skip that because of
>>>the epoxy coating, somebody there is dreaming. The Lyle tool I used to
>>>replace my springs really did a number on the brand new spring coating -
>>>tried to patch with epoxy glue and hoping it'll hold for a bit.
>>>

>>
>>just rust resistant paint works fine. trouble is, once you have some
>>corrosion, you have pitting & therefore potential fatigue crack
>>initiation. strictly speaking, springs in that condition should be
>>replaced, but i can't say i'm a strict adherant to that rule. depends
>>on mileage & condition.

>
>
> Did you miss something here? This was a brand new spring which was marred
> by the tool - no question of corrosion having started.


!

>
>
>>interesting you mention the lisle tool. i was extremely unimpressed
>>with the principle of that device, for the reasons you're describing
>>happened. i therefore built my own - does not touch the spring at all!
>> i'll email a photo to tegger.

>
>
> I chose it because it *looks* safer than some others, since the loops
> cannot break loose from the spring coils under load. I found on use that
> the screws "machine" a "thread" into the collars, thus reducing their
> effective thickness - IOW safety may not be what it appears.
>

seems it's designed for operator safety at the time of service, not
subsequent fatigue damage safety.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
97 Civic HX Rear Lower Shock Bushing Brian Honda 3 0 28 Oct 2004 10:45 am
2002 Odyssey: Leaking Strut AND Shock Jim Honda 1 1 22 Jun 2004 06:25 pm
2002 Odyssey: Leaking Strut AND Shock Jim Honda 3 1 22 Jun 2004 06:25 pm
03 Accord coupe strut tower brace for sedan? George Elkins Honda 3 0 23 Nov 2003 04:59 pm
95 Legend shock/strut upgrade recommendations Steve Jones Acura 0 22 Nov 2003 12:05 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.