Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 24 Mar 2005, 09:21 am
garcia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Timing chain on 93 Honda Accord

About 2 months ago I had my timing chain replaced along with water pump and
radiator. I had my brothers friend take care of it. I thought it was
running fine until I changed my own distributor cap and rotor then two
days later the Rpm when coming to a stop would drop to about five hundred.
So I took the car to a shop near my house. The machanic said that my timing
belt was off. He showed me that the two timing marks where not aligned with
the cylinder head surface. Do those need to be perfectly aligned or can
they be slightly off? I was also told that the belt was on to tight. Could
me changing the cap and rotor messed up the timing? The person that changed
my timing chain to begin with said that it is okay for the timing chain to
be off on the timing marks with the cylinder head. Does anyone have any
advice?

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 24 Mar 2005, 09:43 am
TeGGer®
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing chain on 93 Honda Accord

"garcia" <jessica2001_95694@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:5456736221a070943cf11675639dbfde@localhost.ta lkaboutautos.com:

> About 2 months ago I had my timing chain replaced along with water
> pump and radiator. I had my brothers friend take care of it. I thought
> it was running fine until I changed my own distributor cap and rotor
> then two days later the Rpm when coming to a stop would drop to about
> five hundred. So I took the car to a shop near my house. The machanic
> said that my timing belt was off. He showed me that the two timing
> marks where not aligned with the cylinder head surface. Do those need
> to be perfectly aligned or can they be slightly off? I was also told
> that the belt was on to tight. Could me changing the cap and rotor
> messed up the timing? The person that changed my timing chain to begin
> with said that it is okay for the timing chain to be off on the timing
> marks with the cylinder head. Does anyone have any advice?
>
>



1) A rubber/fabric timing belt is not the same as a steel timing chain. You
have a belt. Do not confuse the terms.

2) No, it is NOT acceptable for the belt alignment to be off by even one
tooth.

3) It is NOT acceptable for it to be too tight. Excessive tension will
cause the belt to fail, and your motor could sustain considerable damage.

4) Changing your distributor cap and rotor can affect the IGNITION timing,
but not the VALVE timing. The ignition timning should be checked and reset
if necessary afer ANY removal of the distributor cap and/or rotor.

Somebody owes you a fix here. And you need to find a better mechanic.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 24 Mar 2005, 10:06 am
garcia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing chain on 93 Honda Accord

Thank you for your quick response, so if the crankshaft pulley is off by
one tooth from the cylinder head cover would the whole timing belt need to
be taken off and then replaced. I ask because my car is at the shop and I
was told that it will be $320 to fix it. I just do not want to have any
doubts. When I talked to the guy that worked on my car he said that the
tensioner spring was not working, it was loose so he just tightend it.
Could the tensioner spring be replaced?

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 24 Mar 2005, 11:19 am
Steve
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing chain on 93 Honda Accord


"garcia" <jessica2001_95694@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e1f92bac55f327fef3f4ecfd1f7cb7a1@localhost.ta lkaboutautos.com...
> Thank you for your quick response, so if the crankshaft pulley is off by
> one tooth from the cylinder head cover would the whole timing belt need to
> be taken off and then replaced. I ask because my car is at the shop and I
> was told that it will be $320 to fix it. I just do not want to have any
> doubts. When I talked to the guy that worked on my car he said that the
> tensioner spring was not working, it was loose so he just tightend it.
> Could the tensioner spring be replaced?
>


Remember the shop is going to give you a guarantee.... a "friend" usually
does not

A little confusion here, the tensioner spring is too loose, the belt is too
tight? If the spring doesn't meet specs, them replace it.
After the belt was changed the first time did the car run OK? As well as
before? that tells you the belt was on correctly. if it was on correctly and
ran correctly and was too tight, how did it move a tooth?
Also related to the belt tension, a too tight belt can cause a cam bearing
to fail,
Let the shop do the job right and prevent a catastrophic failure..



--
Stephen W. Hansen
ASE Certified Master Automobile Technician
ASE Undercar Specialist


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 24 Mar 2005, 11:44 am
garcia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing chain on 93 Honda Accord

I was told that the tensioner spring was not good and it was not replaced
but that the bolt was tightend I'm guessing that it was tightened to what
the guy thought it should be at and then tightened the bolt. The only
difference I noticed in the car was that it was the engine was slightly
louder and the car was running different, not better.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 24 Mar 2005, 12:04 pm
TeGGer®
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing chain on 93 Honda Accord

"garcia" <jessica2001_95694@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:2ec0780eb7cd7a856b5ec0791b5d1071@localhost.ta lkaboutautos.com:

> I was told that the tensioner spring was not good and it was not replaced
> but that the bolt was tightend I'm guessing that it was tightened to what
> the guy thought it should be at and then tightened the bolt. The only
> difference I noticed in the car was that it was the engine was slightly
> louder and the car was running different, not better.
>
>



A bad tensioner spring will result in insufficient belt tension, that is, a
loose belt.

If the belt is too tight, you'll get a whirring or moaning noise from the
engine, which will get louder as you rev it. A overtightened belt is a sign
of inept installation, not a spring problem.

You very desperately need to, very quickly, go to a DIFFERENT garage and
get this rectified.

And I sure hope the "mechanic" you used replaced your balancer belt as
well.

Don't drive this car any more than necessary until this problem is fixed.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 24 Mar 2005, 03:08 pm
garcia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing chain on 93 Honda Accord

Thanks to all of you who responded.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
timing chain papote7878 Honda 3 3 09 Feb 2007 02:52 pm
Honda v6 Timing chain magix23 Honda 2 11 12 Jun 2005 08:20 am
Timing chain on 93 Honda Accord garcia Honda 3 0 24 Mar 2005 09:12 am
Get Accord 2004 V4 instead of V6 re timing chain / belt Daniel TONG Honda 3 9 09 Aug 2004 06:25 pm
Timing Chain Rich Honda 2 3 25 Aug 2003 06:07 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.