Honda Car Forum | ![]() |
|
|||
|
Yeah, the S2000 is a wonderful car. Many enthusiast automotive
journalist know that Honda rocks. The Q45 on the other hand, is like a big fat guy with huge muscles. He's not all that agile and his weight keeps him from utilizing all that strength, but he sure has a lot of power. The DOHC 4.5 liter engine shows there's no replacement for displacement. With the- now long gone -gentleman's agreement in Japan among the auto makers to limit horsepower ratings, the Q45 had more like 300 hp. It had valve timing (albeit on one side) starting in 1990! This makes it pass like a demon at speeds above 60 mph. If you ever driven one, you know when you gun it on the highway it's like a time warp. The other cars are gone in a flash. Certain engine makers just know how to more power from the same dispalcement. Without a turbo(s), what 2 or 2.2 liter car is fast as the S2000? Also, the 4.6 liter truck I have, weighs about the same as my Q45, but it feels like a slug at highway speeds. Long live the S2000 and Q45! |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| s2000 | Michael Selin | Honda 2 | 15 | 03 Jul 2006 08:03 pm |
| Re: honda s2000 | Pedro | Honda 2 | 0 | 18 Jul 2005 08:56 am |
| Re: honda s2000 | Pedro | Honda 2 | 0 | 18 Jul 2005 08:54 am |
| S2000 | Richard Rimmer | Honda 2 | 8 | 06 Jul 2004 01:02 am |
| S2000 | John Booher | Honda 3 | 7 | 26 Nov 2003 01:18 am |