Honda Car Forum

> > In my 1985 Celica the sender unit had a seperate contact that
> > closed when the fuel in the tank got low enough. I suspect the
> > 1995 Passport uses a similar setup. If this is the situation, then
> > the fuel tank will have to be removed and the defective switch
> > repair/replaced. It is posible, thoguh unlikely that Honda
> > could have used an electronic voltage sensor to trip the light
> > when the fuel gauge reads below some set point. Given the
> > greater complexity, ie expense, I suspect that Honda went
> > with the same basic sensor that my Celica used.

it's the same unit as the fuel level unit. the tanks aren't bad to
drop. having a brass punch to remove the retaining ring is another
thing.
it's an odd animal since it is an isuzu rodeo.
Chip

I own a 1995 Honda Passport, so I looked in a '95 Passport wiring
diagram.

It shows two fuel level sensors, one for the fuel guage and the other
operates the low fuel light.

I would guess the the low fuel sensor is sticking.

All the fuel sensors that I have seen are mechanical....A float rubs
on a coil of resistance wire

I never let my fuel level get below a quarter full so my low fuel
light has never come on. I wonder if mine would stick if I let it get
low enough.

On 22 Nov 2004 17:59:12 -0800, chip@chipanddebby.com (Chip Stein)
wrote:

>> > In my 1985 Celica the sender unit had a seperate contact that
>> > closed when the fuel in the tank got low enough. I suspect the
>> > 1995 Passport uses a similar setup. If this is the situation, then
>> > the fuel tank will have to be removed and the defective switch
>> > repair/replaced. It is posible, thoguh unlikely that Honda
>> > could have used an electronic voltage sensor to trip the light
>> > when the fuel gauge reads below some set point. Given the
>> > greater complexity, ie expense, I suspect that Honda went
>> > with the same basic sensor that my Celica used.
>
> it's the same unit as the fuel level unit. the tanks aren't bad to
>drop. having a brass punch to remove the retaining ring is another
>thing.
> it's an odd animal since it is an isuzu rodeo.
> Chip

My wife drives our Rodeo to work, for the most part, and she is in the habit
of letting it go until the fuel gauge is almost resting on E before getting
gas, yet the fuel low indicator light never comes on. On the other hand,
the fuel gauge sometimes seems a bit erratic and will not show full even
though I have topped off the tank, especially during cold weather. Perhaps
one of these days my wife will let the tank get a bit too empty and we'll
find out it the low end of the gauge is any more accurate than the high end.

Happy Thanksgiving to all!!!

--
__________________________________________________ ___
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati - When all else fails; play dead
"Charlie S" <chasa@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:8bt7q0547h8901mjqns95j7ncch1kfchem@4ax.com...
>
> I own a 1995 Honda Passport, so I looked in a '95 Passport wiring
> diagram.
>
> It shows two fuel level sensors, one for the fuel guage and the other
> operates the low fuel light.
>
> I would guess the the low fuel sensor is sticking.
>
> All the fuel sensors that I have seen are mechanical....A float rubs
> on a coil of resistance wire
>
> I never let my fuel level get below a quarter full so my low fuel
> light has never come on. I wonder if mine would stick if I let it get
> low enough.
>
> On 22 Nov 2004 17:59:12 -0800, chip@chipanddebby.com (Chip Stein)
> wrote:
>
>>> > In my 1985 Celica the sender unit had a seperate contact that
>>> > closed when the fuel in the tank got low enough. I suspect the
>>> > 1995 Passport uses a similar setup. If this is the situation, then
>>> > the fuel tank will have to be removed and the defective switch
>>> > repair/replaced. It is posible, thoguh unlikely that Honda
>>> > could have used an electronic voltage sensor to trip the light
>>> > when the fuel gauge reads below some set point. Given the
>>> > greater complexity, ie expense, I suspect that Honda went
>>> > with the same basic sensor that my Celica used.
>>
>> it's the same unit as the fuel level unit. the tanks aren't bad to
>>drop. having a brass punch to remove the retaining ring is another
>>thing.
>> it's an odd animal since it is an isuzu rodeo.
>> Chip
>