Honda Car Forum | |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I was planning to have the transmission fluid changed in my Honda Accord
(maybe do it myself). Out of curiosity I called the Honda dealer to find out how much they'd charge to do, and they said they could either just drain and replace it (for $55) - which doesn't replace all the old fluid since some remains trapped in the torque converter, etc, or they could do a "power flush" (for ($140 -ikes!) which would force new fluid throughout the whole system. The power flush sounds better but is pretty expensive. My other thought was to change it once, drive it for a short while (to circulate the new stuff through) and then change it again. But now I'm wondering whether all of this (power flush or double change) is really over kill and a normal change would be sufficient. Any opinions on this? Thanks, Pat |
|
|||
|
From: pkelecy@insightbb*no_spam*.com (Pat) wrote: >My other thought was to change it once, >drive it for a short while (to circulate the >new stuff through) and then change it >again. That's what I see recommended when the fluid hasn't been changed in a long time. >But now I'm wondering whether all of >this (power flush or double change) is >really over kill and a normal change >would be sufficient. * Any opinions on >this? As I said above, if you haven't changed it in a long time and it smells burnt and has no pink left in its color, I'd double change it. I seem to recall reading negative comments about flushing the system. Perhaps someone more knowledgable than myself can clarify for you. |
|
|||
|
my only experience with a 'power flush' was less than desirable with an
old Nissan. The day after they flushed it, i started to lose fluid @ highway speeds and had to get to towed. The dealer claimed this was a *total* coincidence. I assumed the 'power' affected the seals somehow. my $0.02 Pat wrote: > I was planning to have the transmission fluid changed in my Honda Accord > (maybe do it myself). Out of curiosity I called the Honda dealer to find > out how much they'd charge to do, and they said they could either just drain > and replace it (for $55) - which doesn't replace all the old fluid since > some remains trapped in the torque converter, etc, or they could do a > "power flush" (for ($140 -ikes!) which would force new fluid throughout the > whole system. > > The power flush sounds better but is pretty expensive. My other thought was > to change it once, drive it for a short while (to circulate the new stuff > through) and then change it again. > > But now I'm wondering whether all of this (power flush or double change) is > really over kill and a normal change would be sufficient. Any opinions on > this? > > Thanks, > > Pat > > |
|
|||
|
> That's what I see recommended when the fluid hasn't been changed in a
> long time. > > >But now I'm wondering whether all of > >this (power flush or double change) is > >really over kill and a normal change > >would be sufficient. Any opinions on > >this? > > As I said above, if you haven't changed it in a long time and it smells > burnt and has no pink left in its color, I'd double change it. I seem to > recall reading negative comments about flushing the system. Perhaps > someone more knowledgable than myself can clarify for you. the problem with flush machines is the chemical in the flush eats the clutch packs. just drain it and fill it then dive it a bit, do that 3 times. that's as clean as it needs to be. Chip |
|
|||
|
My feeling is that the power flush does not clean/replace the filter if
a Honda is so equipped... JT spam@spam.com wrote: > > my only experience with a 'power flush' was less than desirable with an > old Nissan. The day after they flushed it, i started to lose fluid @ > highway speeds and had to get to towed. The dealer claimed this was a > *total* coincidence. > I assumed the 'power' affected the seals somehow. > > my $0.02 > > Pat wrote: > > > I was planning to have the transmission fluid changed in my Honda Accord > > (maybe do it myself). Out of curiosity I called the Honda dealer to find > > out how much they'd charge to do, and they said they could either just drain > > and replace it (for $55) - which doesn't replace all the old fluid since > > some remains trapped in the torque converter, etc, or they could do a > > "power flush" (for ($140 -ikes!) which would force new fluid throughout the > > whole system. > > > > The power flush sounds better but is pretty expensive. My other thought was > > to change it once, drive it for a short while (to circulate the new stuff > > through) and then change it again. > > > > But now I'm wondering whether all of this (power flush or double change) is > > really over kill and a normal change would be sufficient. Any opinions on > > this? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Pat > > > > |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 99 Accord V6 - power steering/trans flush? | Dave Garrett | Honda 2 | 10 | 02 Jan 2007 12:51 pm |
| 99 Accord V6 - power steering/trans flush? | Dave Garrett | Honda 3 | 10 | 02 Jan 2007 12:51 pm |
| Transmission flush harmful? | jbourgeois | Honda 3 | 1 | 05 Dec 2004 08:09 pm |
| 96 Acura RL - possible transmission shudder problem after transmission flush | Elizabeth Sullivan | Acura | 11 | 05 May 2004 05:46 pm |
| Transmission Flush myself? | sancheuz | Honda 3 | 18 | 20 Dec 2003 10:51 am |