Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10 Jul 2004, 10:52 am
ravelation
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Camber Kit or Bending?

We took the Civic to the Alignment shop to diagnose the tire wear
problem. First step was two new tires on the front. Now, they offer two
ways to fix the problem--
install a camber kit for $240. or physically bend the knuckle dealy for
$55. each side.
Downside to the bending is if the suspension gets changed, ie: raised,
you have to rebend it. A camber kit would allow adjustment.

Bearing in mind this is the Frankenstein Civic (it looks great, but is
put together with multiple year parts), I'm leaning toward bending the
metal. Has anyone heard any horror stories from this method? Does this
increase the odds of something breaking?

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10 Jul 2004, 11:17 am
Mista Bone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Camber Kit or Bending?

maybe replacing the already bent parts would be a better idea.

"ravelation" <ravelation@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:20786-40F010CD-49@storefull-3276.bay.webtv.net...
> We took the Civic to the Alignment shop to diagnose the tire wear
> problem. First step was two new tires on the front. Now, they offer two
> ways to fix the problem--
> install a camber kit for $240. or physically bend the knuckle dealy for
> $55. each side.
> Downside to the bending is if the suspension gets changed, ie: raised,
> you have to rebend it. A camber kit would allow adjustment.
>
> Bearing in mind this is the Frankenstein Civic (it looks great, but is
> put together with multiple year parts), I'm leaning toward bending the
> metal. Has anyone heard any horror stories from this method? Does this
> increase the odds of something breaking?
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10 Jul 2004, 02:36 pm
E. Meyer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Camber Kit or Bending?

On 7/10/04 10:52 AM, in article
20786-40F010CD-49@storefull-3276.bay.webtv.net, "ravelation"
<ravelation@webtv.net> wrote:

> We took the Civic to the Alignment shop to diagnose the tire wear
> problem. First step was two new tires on the front. Now, they offer two
> ways to fix the problem--
> install a camber kit for $240. or physically bend the knuckle dealy for
> $55. each side.
> Downside to the bending is if the suspension gets changed, ie: raised,
> you have to rebend it. A camber kit would allow adjustment.
>
> Bearing in mind this is the Frankenstein Civic (it looks great, but is
> put together with multiple year parts), I'm leaning toward bending the
> metal. Has anyone heard any horror stories from this method? Does this
> increase the odds of something breaking?
>


I have had suspension parts on several cars (three Hondas, an Acura & a Ford
truck) bent by the frame shop when the unadjustable parameters were no
longer in spec. Never had a problem afterwards. What they are doing is
basically returning it to its original position/shape.

A reputable shop will recommend the kit (if there is a kit) before they bend
anything. I would let them bend it. If it doesn't work out, you can
always install the kit or replace the out-of-spec parts.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10 Jul 2004, 07:26 pm
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Camber Kit or Bending?

personally, i'd go with the kit. if they're going to bend anything it
should be the frame not the control arms because the upper arm needs to
either get longer or be set out further. and the trouble with bending
the frame is that if you sell it at any time, the buyer may have a hell
of a job adjusting the ride height again if they chose to. so
personally, i think it would pay more on resale for the car that's been
done right rather than the one that's been fudged - frankenstein or not.

ravelation wrote:
> We took the Civic to the Alignment shop to diagnose the tire wear
> problem. First step was two new tires on the front. Now, they offer two
> ways to fix the problem--
> install a camber kit for $240. or physically bend the knuckle dealy for
> $55. each side.
> Downside to the bending is if the suspension gets changed, ie: raised,
> you have to rebend it. A camber kit would allow adjustment.
>
> Bearing in mind this is the Frankenstein Civic (it looks great, but is
> put together with multiple year parts), I'm leaning toward bending the
> metal. Has anyone heard any horror stories from this method? Does this
> increase the odds of something breaking?
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10 Jul 2004, 10:18 pm
SoCalMike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Camber Kit or Bending?



jim beam wrote:
> personally, i'd go with the kit. if they're going to bend anything it
> should be the frame not the control arms because the upper arm needs to
> either get longer or be set out further. and the trouble with bending
> the frame is that if you sell it at any time, the buyer may have a hell
> of a job adjusting the ride height again if they chose to. so
> personally, i think it would pay more on resale for the car that's been
> done right rather than the one that's been fudged - frankenstein or not.


no offense, but by the time most teenage boys get done with civics, they
arent worth reselling. theyre beat, pimped out, and full of
dubious-quality aftermarket crap.

generally, every dollar spent on "enhancements" takes a dollar from the
true value of the car.

eg: a stock civic with a blue book value of $7000.

add $2000 in wheels, drop kit, stickers, wings, and the car is now worth
$5000
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10 Jul 2004, 11:38 pm
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Camber Kit or Bending?

SoCalMike wrote:
>
>
> jim beam wrote:
>
>> personally, i'd go with the kit. if they're going to bend anything it
>> should be the frame not the control arms because the upper arm needs
>> to either get longer or be set out further. and the trouble with
>> bending the frame is that if you sell it at any time, the buyer may
>> have a hell of a job adjusting the ride height again if they chose
>> to. so personally, i think it would pay more on resale for the car
>> that's been done right rather than the one that's been fudged -
>> frankenstein or not.

>
>
> no offense, but by the time most teenage boys get done with civics, they
> arent worth reselling. theyre beat, pimped out, and full of
> dubious-quality aftermarket crap.
>
> generally, every dollar spent on "enhancements" takes a dollar from the
> true value of the car.
>
> eg: a stock civic with a blue book value of $7000.
>
> add $2000 in wheels, drop kit, stickers, wings, and the car is now worth
> $5000


agreed. i guess i was saying that /my/ opinion of value is even lower
of the car that's been bent vs. the one that's been reversibly modded.
/neither/ enhance value.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11 Jul 2004, 09:11 am
TomP
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Camber Kit or Bending?

ravelation wrote:

> We took the Civic to the Alignment shop to diagnose the tire wear
> problem. First step was two new tires on the front. Now, they offer two
> ways to fix the problem--
> install a camber kit for $240. or physically bend the knuckle dealy for
> $55. each side.


>
> Downside to the bending is if the suspension gets changed, ie: raised,
> you have to rebend it. A camber kit would allow adjustment.


You are implying by the comment, ("ie: raised"), that the car is
lowered. If this is the case, I see no reason not to bend the knuckles.
Sounds like your alignment shop does this on a regular basis, so hopefully
knows what they are doing.

> Bearing in mind this is the Frankenstein Civic (it looks great,


That's matter of taste... ;-o


--
Tp,

-------- __o
----- -\<. -------- __o
--- ( )/ ( ) ---- -\<.
-------------------- ( )/ ( )
-----------------------------------------

No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron...


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11 Jul 2004, 11:27 am
ravelation
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Camber Kit or Bending?


mikein562athotmail@hotmail.com (SoCalMike) wrote:

>no offense, but by the time most teenage
>boys get done with civics, they arent
>worth reselling. theyre beat, pimped out,
>and full of dubious-quality aftermarket
>crap.
>generally, every dollar spent on
>"enhancements" takes a dollar from the
>true value of the car.


>eg: a stock civic with a blue book value
>of $7000.
>add $2000 in wheels, drop kit, stickers,
>wings, and the car is now worth $5000


Ha! You know the SoCal market well! There are the other teens though,
who drool at the car and 'say' they'll give you $9k. Show me the money!!

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11 Jul 2004, 11:33 am
ravelation
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Camber Kit or Bending?

In answer to TomP- (can't seem to capture your words)

Yes, the car is lowered. It's also had accidents and frame bending
already done. Surprisingly though, it drives nice and straight. It just
chews tires like there's no tomorrow.

Regarding the looks of the car-- Even the stuffy ol' bitty across the
street came out of her dungeon to tell me how nice the car was. It's a
tastefully modded black Coupe.



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12 Jul 2004, 01:44 pm
Alex Rodriguez
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Camber Kit or Bending?

In article <19254-40F16BE0-53@storefull-3275.bay.webtv.net>,
ravelation@webtv.net says...
>
>
>In answer to TomP- (can't seem to capture your words)
>
>Yes, the car is lowered. It's also had accidents and frame bending
>already done. Surprisingly though, it drives nice and straight. It just
>chews tires like there's no tomorrow.
>
>Regarding the looks of the car-- Even the stuffy ol' bitty across the
>street came out of her dungeon to tell me how nice the car was. It's a
>tastefully modded black Coupe.


I would just tell them to bend away.
-----------
Alex

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment? televascular Honda 2 26 11 Sep 2006 04:42 am
bad camber zac s via CarKB.com Honda 2 10 04 Jul 2005 09:26 am
how to put on sprigns,shocks, and camber kit kyle lallave Honda 1 0 16 Nov 2004 04:20 pm
how to put on springs/shocks/camber kit kyle lallave Honda 2 0 15 Nov 2004 10:33 pm
FS: skunk2 coils and camber kit. Josh Huffmaster Honda 2 0 26 Sep 2003 06:35 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.