Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 15 Jul 2004, 03:36 pm
Sean Dinh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Update

rpm that high is not considered 'lugging' the engine. Mine is only at 1500. Have you
tried any of the combustion chamber cleaner?

gmccx wrote:

> It's right at 2600-2700 rpm in 5th. So 45 is just a bit below
> that (duh). But that 45-50 ini 5th is the magic place where I can hear
> what I keep thinking is a bit of pinging... but any other gear at the
> same rpm doesn't produce that sound. That is the part that would tend
> to make me think it isn't a ping at all, unless shifting to 5th makes
> some ignition timeing change by default to favor mileage or such.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 15 Jul 2004, 10:03 pm
gmccx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pinging for what reason?

George Macdonald wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 07:29:28 -0400, gmccx <gmccx@notvalid.com> wrote:
>
>>Sean Dinh wrote:
>>
>>>It means that the car is traveling at 45 mph, and that you're trying to maintain
>>>constant speed at 45 mph. It should be ok in 5th.
>>>
>>>gmccx wrote:
>>>
>>>>4-5th shift Normal acceleration, 49 mph
>>>>4-5th shift Cruise from acceleration, 45 mph.
>>>>

>>Sounds reasonable, and I did pay attention to the rpm at 50 on the way
>>to work. It's right at 2600-2700 rpm in 5th. So 45 is just a bit below
>>that (duh). But that 45-50 ini 5th is the magic place where I can hear
>>what I keep thinking is a bit of pinging... but any other gear at the

>
> Although it's much less noticeable in lower gears, if you go up a hill in
> 3rd which might be easier done in 2nd, it does happen - IOW slight lugging
> is necessary to provoke it. I'm still suspicious that it *is* pinging,
> since it's so load dependent - my take: Honda made a cock-up of the
> ignition profile in the ECU. I'm going to try backing off the ignition
> timing a touch - it is slightly advanced of the middle mark. I also think
> oxygenated fuel is an aggravating factor here.


I did mess with the timing a while back and I think the finding was that
I couldn't really affect it much at all... but I *could* make it run
worse by retarding it too far.

The most puzzling part of the deal though is why I can ever hear
anything at all because I would think the anti-knock sensor (mounted on
the block) would 'hear' something long before I could hear it and adjust
accordingly (timing or such). Of course if I can't stop it with timing
perhaps the anti-knock sensor/control can't either.

And I still have this nagging suspicion that it all may have started
with a timing belt change long ago. But I didn't notice the ping and/or
associate with the belt until too long after the work was done to be
able to complain about it to the dealer.

(I altered the subject since I wandered this thread a bit off of the
orginal topic)

--

George

http://people.delphiforums.com/gmcc

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 16 Jul 2004, 04:46 pm
George Macdonald
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pinging for what reason?

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:03:30 -0400, gmccx <gmccx@notvalid.com> wrote:

>George Macdonald wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 07:29:28 -0400, gmccx <gmccx@notvalid.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Sean Dinh wrote:
>>>
>>>>It means that the car is traveling at 45 mph, and that you're trying to maintain
>>>>constant speed at 45 mph. It should be ok in 5th.
>>>>
>>>>gmccx wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>4-5th shift Normal acceleration, 49 mph
>>>>>4-5th shift Cruise from acceleration, 45 mph.
>>>>>
>>>Sounds reasonable, and I did pay attention to the rpm at 50 on the way
>>>to work. It's right at 2600-2700 rpm in 5th. So 45 is just a bit below
>>>that (duh). But that 45-50 ini 5th is the magic place where I can hear
>>>what I keep thinking is a bit of pinging... but any other gear at the

>>
>> Although it's much less noticeable in lower gears, if you go up a hill in
>> 3rd which might be easier done in 2nd, it does happen - IOW slight lugging
>> is necessary to provoke it. I'm still suspicious that it *is* pinging,
>> since it's so load dependent - my take: Honda made a cock-up of the
>> ignition profile in the ECU. I'm going to try backing off the ignition
>> timing a touch - it is slightly advanced of the middle mark. I also think
>> oxygenated fuel is an aggravating factor here.

>
>I did mess with the timing a while back and I think the finding was that
>I couldn't really affect it much at all... but I *could* make it run
>worse by retarding it too far.
>
>The most puzzling part of the deal though is why I can ever hear
>anything at all because I would think the anti-knock sensor (mounted on
>the block) would 'hear' something long before I could hear it and adjust
>accordingly (timing or such). Of course if I can't stop it with timing
>perhaps the anti-knock sensor/control can't either.


My Integra GS has no knock sensor so not sure how that impacts. I've tried
premium gas, different brands of gas and Chevron Techron Concentrate which
claims to clean valves and combustion chamber deposits as well as fuel
injectors but nothing made any difference so it's possible that timing
adjustments will be futile too. I'll report back when I get around to
it.<sigh>

>And I still have this nagging suspicion that it all may have started
>with a timing belt change long ago. But I didn't notice the ping and/or
>associate with the belt until too long after the work was done to be
>able to complain about it to the dealer.


Dunno if you already mentioned but have you checked your belt/pulley
alignment and tension?

>(I altered the subject since I wandered this thread a bit off of the
>orginal topic)


Sorry but I hate when people do that - it breaks all the threading in the
archives at Google.

Rgds, George Macdonald

"Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me??
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 16 Jul 2004, 07:20 pm
gmccx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pinging for what reason?

George Macdonald wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:03:30 -0400, gmccx <gmccx@notvalid.com> wrote:
>
>
>>George Macdonald wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 07:29:28 -0400, gmccx <gmccx@notvalid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sean Dinh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>It means that the car is traveling at 45 mph, and that you're trying to maintain
>>>>>constant speed at 45 mph. It should be ok in 5th.
>>>>>
>>>>>gmccx wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>4-5th shift Normal acceleration, 49 mph
>>>>>>4-5th shift Cruise from acceleration, 45 mph.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Sounds reasonable, and I did pay attention to the rpm at 50 on the way
>>>>to work. It's right at 2600-2700 rpm in 5th. So 45 is just a bit below
>>>>that (duh). But that 45-50 ini 5th is the magic place where I can hear
>>>>what I keep thinking is a bit of pinging... but any other gear at the
>>>
>>>Although it's much less noticeable in lower gears, if you go up a hill in
>>>3rd which might be easier done in 2nd, it does happen - IOW slight lugging

>>
>>I did mess with the timing a while back and I think the finding was that
>>
>>The most puzzling part of the deal though is why I can ever hear
>>anything at all because I would think the anti-knock sensor (mounted on
>>the block) would 'hear' something long before I could hear it and adjust
>>accordingly (timing or such). Of course if I can't stop it with timing
>>perhaps the anti-knock sensor/control can't either.

>
>
> My Integra GS has no knock sensor so not sure how that impacts. I've tried
>
> injectors but nothing made any difference so it's possible that timing
> adjustments will be futile too. I'll report back when I get around to
> it.<sigh>


I'll try not to miss you note about it.

>
>>And I still have this nagging suspicion that it all may have started
>>with a timing belt change long ago. But I didn't notice the ping and/or

>
> Dunno if you already mentioned but have you checked your belt/pulley
> alignment and tension?


No, I've not done anything. I'll have to pull the valve cover to see
anything and for quite a time I was content to just stay out of 5th
below 50 and not worry about it. But it still nags at me a bit. :-)

>
>
>>(I altered the subject since I wandered this thread a bit off of the

>
> Sorry but I hate when people do that - it breaks all the threading in the
> archives at Google.
>


Hmmm. I wasn't at all aware of that, probably because I've never read
groups on Google. I'll refrain from same in the future.

--

George

http://people.delphiforums.com/gmcc

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 16 Jul 2004, 07:22 pm
gmccx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pinging for what reason?

George Macdonald wrote:

> Sorry but I hate when people do that - it breaks all the threading in the
> archives at Google.
>


And if you hadn't mentioned it, I might have never known, because
Netscape/Moz still shows my message in the same thread...just with a
different subject.


--

George

http://people.delphiforums.com/gmcc

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 17 Jul 2004, 10:55 pm
gmccx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pinging for what reason?

George Macdonald wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:03:30 -0400, gmccx <gmccx@notvalid.com> wrote:
>
>
>>George Macdonald wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>Sounds reasonable, and I did pay attention to the rpm at 50 on the way
>>>>to work. It's right at 2600-2700 rpm in 5th. So 45 is just a bit below
>>>
>>>Although it's much less noticeable in lower gears, if you go up a hill in
>>>3rd which might be easier done in 2nd, it does happen - IOW slight lugging
>>>is necessary to provoke it. I'm still suspicious that it *is* pinging,
>>>since it's so load dependent - my take: Honda made a cock-up of the

>>
>>The most puzzling part of the deal though is why I can ever hear
>>anything at all because I would think the anti-knock sensor (mounted on
>>the block) would 'hear' something long before I could hear it and adjust

>
> My Integra GS has no knock sensor so not sure how that impacts. I've tried
> premium gas, different brands of gas and Chevron Techron Concentrate which


>
>>And I still have this nagging suspicion that it all may have started
>>with a timing belt change long ago. But I didn't notice the ping and/or

>
>
> Dunno if you already mentioned but have you checked your belt/pulley
> alignment and tension?
>
>


I didn't have much to do today so I pulled the valve cover to have a
look at the timing belt/alighment. Everything looks good to me, with
the little marks all lining up at TDC as per the service book. So
whatever I'm hearing isn't due to a TB installed wrong or such.

--

George

http://people.delphiforums.com/gmcc

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
98 Civic Ignition Timing duckbill Honda 2 1 20 Aug 2006 02:45 pm
98 Civic Ignition Timing acioaca@lycos.com Honda 2 22 06 Oct 2005 07:56 am
1998 Civic Ignition Timing acioaca@lycos.com Honda 2 5 26 Sep 2005 09:00 pm
Honda Civic Ignition Timing Help Davant95 Honda 2 1 18 Apr 2004 01:03 pm
97 Civic - How do you set the ignition timing? Fastcars2983 Honda 3 2 27 Sep 2003 05:41 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.