Honda Car Forum | |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Dear all:
In the next several years, I will eventually be looking for a car. I currently have a 1995 Prelude (which is fourth generation) with 160 HP. It is running like a champion. After I get all the useable life out of this beauty, I will be looking for a replacement. For several months, I have been toiling over this question of whether to go with the 200HP V-tech fifth generation Prelude or the 240HP v6 six speed Accord. They each have their good points. The V6 Accord has 40 more HP which seems like a lot. However, I did some calculation: The Accord would be ~325 lbs heavier. Non-the-less, I think that the Accord would still be very very fast. It does 0 to 60 in 7.5 seconds. Also, it has six speeds, which would be fun to shift and drive. Then, lastnight, I was driving my current fourth gen. Prelude and everything became clear to me. . . See, I took a very fast turn--a turn that no other car has any business taking. My prelude handled it with simple and impressive ease. I made the tires sqeech in this high speed left turn. It was very cool. NO BODY ROLL at all! This little reminder just cinched the deal for me! I realized that I cannot drive a car that will have body roll--horsepower or not! So, the above is a my story of how I came to decide that a few years from now, when I am in the market for a car, it will be the fifth generation Prelude. From what I read, the fifth gen. has even a stiffer chasis and even better handling! I think I will be very happy. As far as horsepower is concerned, I know I won't be getting the 240. However, I will be moving from the 160HP (my current prelude has 160HP) to 200 hp (the fifth gen preludes are all v-tech 200 HP cars). Oh. BTW, I am not going to buy the SH model which has that Torque steering (SH model) thing. I don't think I will need it. Beside the SH models are a bit heavier and I don't need the extra weight. signed: Prelude guy. |
|
|||
|
"LovingPerson" <saylo1234@aol.com> wrote in message news:fed77941.0406080426.d8430c7@posting.google.co m... > Dear all: > > In the next several years, I will eventually be looking for a > car. I currently have a 1995 Prelude (which is fourth generation) > with 160 HP. It is running like a champion. After I get all the > useable life out of this beauty, I will be looking for a replacement. > > For several months, I have been toiling over this question of > whether to go with the 200HP V-tech fifth generation Prelude or the > 240HP v6 six speed Accord. They each have their good points. The V6 > Accord has 40 more HP which seems like a lot. However, I did some > calculation: The Accord would be ~325 lbs heavier. Non-the-less, I > think that the Accord would still be very very fast. It does 0 to 60 > in 7.5 seconds. Also, it has six speeds, which would be fun to shift > and drive. > > Then, lastnight, I was driving my current fourth gen. Prelude > and everything became clear to me. . . See, I took a very fast > turn--a turn that no other car has any business taking. My prelude > handled it with simple and impressive ease. I made the tires sqeech > in this high speed left turn. It was very cool. NO BODY ROLL at > all! This little reminder just cinched the deal for me! I realized > that I cannot drive a car that will have body roll--horsepower or not! > > So, the above is a my story of how I came to decide that a few > years from now, when I am in the market for a car, it will be the > fifth generation Prelude. From what I read, the fifth gen. has even a > stiffer chasis and even better handling! I think I will be very > happy. As far as horsepower is concerned, I know I won't be getting > the 240. However, I will be moving from the 160HP (my current prelude > has 160HP) to 200 hp (the fifth gen preludes are all v-tech 200 HP > cars). Oh. BTW, I am not going to buy the SH model which has that > Torque steering (SH model) thing. I don't think I will need it. > Beside the SH models are a bit heavier and I don't need the extra > weight. > > signed: Prelude guy. Good luck finding a decent one. I have an 01 Base 5 spd with 42k miles on it -- the last year made and it's stock plus being adult driven and maintained. Most I have seen have been "tricked" or "riced" out in some way. Your only alternative might be the RSX S 6 spd. I plan to hold on to mine for a long time for the same reasons you want one. |
|
|||
|
"TWW" <twaugh5@cox.net> wrote in message news:<V1sxc.3849$1c4.1317@fed1read06>...
> "LovingPerson" <saylo1234@aol.com> wrote in message > news:fed77941.0406080426.d8430c7@posting.google.co m... > > Dear all: > > > > In the next several years, I will eventually be looking for a > > car. I currently have a 1995 Prelude (which is fourth generation) > > with 160 HP. It is running like a champion. After I get all the > > useable life out of this beauty, I will be looking for a replacement. > > > > For several months, I have been toiling over this question of > > whether to go with the 200HP V-tech fifth generation Prelude or the > > 240HP v6 six speed Accord. They each have their good points. The V6 > > Accord has 40 more HP which seems like a lot. However, I did some > > calculation: The Accord would be ~325 lbs heavier. Non-the-less, I > > think that the Accord would still be very very fast. It does 0 to 60 > > in 7.5 seconds. Also, it has six speeds, which would be fun to shift > > and drive. > > > > Then, lastnight, I was driving my current fourth gen. Prelude > > and everything became clear to me. . . See, I took a very fast > > turn--a turn that no other car has any business taking. My prelude > > handled it with simple and impressive ease. I made the tires sqeech > > in this high speed left turn. It was very cool. NO BODY ROLL at > > all! This little reminder just cinched the deal for me! I realized > > that I cannot drive a car that will have body roll--horsepower or not! > > > > So, the above is a my story of how I came to decide that a few > > years from now, when I am in the market for a car, it will be the > > fifth generation Prelude. From what I read, the fifth gen. has even a > > stiffer chasis and even better handling! I think I will be very > > happy. As far as horsepower is concerned, I know I won't be getting > > the 240. However, I will be moving from the 160HP (my current prelude > > has 160HP) to 200 hp (the fifth gen preludes are all v-tech 200 HP > > cars). Oh. BTW, I am not going to buy the SH model which has that > > Torque steering (SH model) thing. I don't think I will need it. > > Beside the SH models are a bit heavier and I don't need the extra > > weight. > > > > signed: Prelude guy. > > Good luck finding a decent one. I have an 01 Base 5 spd with 42k miles on > it -- the last year made and it's stock plus being adult driven and > maintained. Most I have seen have been "tricked" or "riced" out in some > way. Your only alternative might be the RSX S 6 spd. I plan to hold on to > mine for a long time for the same reasons you want one. Yeah. I know. I used to think that it was because the people who own these things are children. However, I have since realized that it isn't just kids who drive the crap out of them. Adults like to beat up on sports cars, too. These people. They don't treat their cars with very good care. My friend was in the market for a boxter. She eventually had to go to a dealer to get one, because all the ones on the market from private parties were all thrashed. You would have thought that people who have treated expensive sports cars like the porsche with more care, but no. So, the point is: Yep, I do heed your point. It will be hard to find a decent one of those Preludes. :-(. I will probably have to pay a pretty penny if I want a nice one. BTW, I do see your point about the RSX type-s. Did you know that they only weigh about 2750 lbs? That is some good weight for a car that has 200HP! cheers. signed: Prelude person. |
|
|||
|
"LovingPerson" <saylo1234@aol.com> wrote in message news:fed77941.0406091032.13237c39@posting.google.c om... > "TWW" <twaugh5@cox.net> wrote in message news:<V1sxc.3849$1c4.1317@fed1read06>... > > "LovingPerson" <saylo1234@aol.com> wrote in message > > news:fed77941.0406080426.d8430c7@posting.google.co m... > > > Dear all: > > > > > > In the next several years, I will eventually be looking for a > > > car. I currently have a 1995 Prelude (which is fourth generation) > > > with 160 HP. It is running like a champion. After I get all the > > > useable life out of this beauty, I will be looking for a replacement. > > > > > > For several months, I have been toiling over this question of > > > whether to go with the 200HP V-tech fifth generation Prelude or the > > > 240HP v6 six speed Accord. They each have their good points. The V6 > > > Accord has 40 more HP which seems like a lot. However, I did some > > > calculation: The Accord would be ~325 lbs heavier. Non-the-less, I > > > think that the Accord would still be very very fast. It does 0 to 60 > > > in 7.5 seconds. Also, it has six speeds, which would be fun to shift > > > and drive. > > > > > > Then, lastnight, I was driving my current fourth gen. Prelude > > > and everything became clear to me. . . See, I took a very fast > > > turn--a turn that no other car has any business taking. My prelude > > > handled it with simple and impressive ease. I made the tires sqeech > > > in this high speed left turn. It was very cool. NO BODY ROLL at > > > all! This little reminder just cinched the deal for me! I realized > > > that I cannot drive a car that will have body roll--horsepower or not! > > > > > > So, the above is a my story of how I came to decide that a few > > > years from now, when I am in the market for a car, it will be the > > > fifth generation Prelude. From what I read, the fifth gen. has even a > > > stiffer chasis and even better handling! I think I will be very > > > happy. As far as horsepower is concerned, I know I won't be getting > > > the 240. However, I will be moving from the 160HP (my current prelude > > > has 160HP) to 200 hp (the fifth gen preludes are all v-tech 200 HP > > > cars). Oh. BTW, I am not going to buy the SH model which has that > > > Torque steering (SH model) thing. I don't think I will need it. > > > Beside the SH models are a bit heavier and I don't need the extra > > > weight. > > > > > > signed: Prelude guy. > > > > Good luck finding a decent one. I have an 01 Base 5 spd with 42k miles on > > it -- the last year made and it's stock plus being adult driven and > > maintained. Most I have seen have been "tricked" or "riced" out in some > > way. Your only alternative might be the RSX S 6 spd. I plan to hold on to > > mine for a long time for the same reasons you want one. > > Yeah. I know. I used to think that it was because the people who own > these things are children. However, I have since realized that it > isn't just kids who drive the crap out of them. Adults like to beat > up on sports cars, too. > > These people. They don't treat their cars with very good care. > > My friend was in the market for a boxter. She eventually had to go to > a dealer to get one, because all the ones on the market from private > parties were all thrashed. You would have thought that people who > have treated expensive sports cars like the porsche with more care, > but no. So, the point is: Yep, I do heed your point. It will be > hard to find a decent one of those Preludes. :-(. I will probably > have to pay a pretty penny if I want a nice one. > > BTW, I do see your point about the RSX type-s. Did you know that they > only weigh about 2750 lbs? That is some good weight for a car that > has 200HP! > > cheers. > > signed: Prelude person. Back in the mid 60s I owned a 2nd hand 64 XKE Series Jaguar roadster. Weight 2750 and a 265 hp DOHC 3.08 I 6. The Jag was tested at 150 with the 3.31 rear, although mine had (as I recollect) a 3.54 which meant around 135 or so. The Jag was a monocoque body, hence the light weight even with a very heavy I 6 that weighed at least as much as a Chevy V8. But, safety today has meant more weight. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Engine wiring Acura 1.6EL, US Civic EX (D16Y8) diffs betw 1997 and 1998 | M5 | Acura | 2 | 09 Mar 2005 08:41 pm |
| Engine wiring Acura 1.6EL, US Civic EX (D16Y8) diffs betw 1997 and 1998 | M5 | Honda 2 | 2 | 09 Mar 2005 08:41 pm |
| Engine wiring Acura 1.6EL, US Civic EX (D16Y8) diffs betw 1997 and 1998 | M5 | Honda 3 | 2 | 09 Mar 2005 08:41 pm |
| HONDA Coupé Prélude 1982 1 200 euros | Lyonnais | Honda 2 | 1 | 25 Dec 2004 04:39 am |
| Which Accord Should I buy? 2004 Coupe 4 cylinder vs Coupe 6 cylinder | Scott | Honda 3 | 15 | 30 Nov 2003 10:00 pm |