Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12 Apr 2004, 12:18 am
TE Cheah
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default S2000 came 3rd ( bottom ) in review, to Nissan 350Z & Mazda RX-8 !

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ee/index1.html





Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12 Apr 2004, 01:36 am
mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: S2000 came 3rd ( bottom ) in review, to Nissan 350Z & Mazda RX-8 !


"TE Cheah" <no@spam.biz> wrote in message news:407a2ff1_1@news.tm.net.my...
> http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ee/index1.html


theyve been having probs with the RX8. FWIW, i think the S2k would hold its
value better than either of the others too.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12 Apr 2004, 02:07 am
Cosmin N.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: S2000 came 3rd ( bottom ) in review, to Nissan 350Z & Mazda RX-8!

mike wrote:

> "TE Cheah" <no@spam.biz> wrote in message news:407a2ff1_1@news.tm.net.my...
>
>>http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ee/index1.html

>
>
> theyve been having probs with the RX8. FWIW, i think the S2k would hold its
> value better than either of the others too.
>


Not only that, but judging by the data listed in the article, the worst
performing car won. The Honda was quickest in cornering and braking. The
Nissan had the best acceleration. Cornering response was the only part
where the RX8 was better than the other two.

There are other aspects when reviewing a car than just raw performance
numbers, but in this case I don't think the Mazda was the clear winner,
nor was the Honda a loser.

Cosmin
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12 Apr 2004, 05:22 am
George Macdonald
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: S2000 came 3rd ( bottom ) in review, to Nissan 350Z & Mazda RX-8 !

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 07:07:02 GMT, "Cosmin N." <no@email.com> wrote:

>mike wrote:
>
>> "TE Cheah" <no@spam.biz> wrote in message news:407a2ff1_1@news.tm.net.my...
>>
>>>http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ee/index1.html

>>
>>
>> theyve been having probs with the RX8. FWIW, i think the S2k would hold its
>> value better than either of the others too.
>>

>
>Not only that, but judging by the data listed in the article, the worst
>performing car won. The Honda was quickest in cornering and braking. The
>Nissan had the best acceleration. Cornering response was the only part
>where the RX8 was better than the other two.
>
>There are other aspects when reviewing a car than just raw performance
>numbers, but in this case I don't think the Mazda was the clear winner,
>nor was the Honda a loser.


Hell those guys don't even know better than to compare the specific output
of a rotary vs. a 4-stroke engine. I don't think there was any clear
winner - still can't figure how the 350Z's touted grunt didn't get it
around a lap fastest. IMO this mostly boils down to personal preferences
and a sports car should not be judged on "around-town ride quality". I
just wish all of those companies would go racing with the damned things.

Rgds, George Macdonald

"Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me??
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12 Apr 2004, 09:22 am
Ted Jackson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: S2000 came 3rd ( bottom ) in review, to Nissan 350Z & Mazda RX-8 !

In article <407a2ff1_1@news.tm.net.my>, "TE Cheah" <no@spam.biz> wrote:

> http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ee/index1.html


I read the story in the magazine and I have read many of their other
reviews related to other cars. It appears to me that the people that
conduct the reviews know which car they think is best before they even
start the tests. They end up picking that car regardless of the test
results. I advise any person that reads the reviews to also read the
letters to the editor. Lots of readers complain in those letters about the
various car review reports. The S2000 should have been first or second
based upon the test results.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12 Apr 2004, 09:46 pm
Jeff Tamblyn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: S2000 came 3rd ( bottom ) in review, to Nissan 350Z & Mazda RX-8 !

besides which the 350z is plug ulgy if you ask me whereas the s2000 is quite
attractive.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12 Apr 2004, 10:43 pm
Cosmin N.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: S2000 came 3rd ( bottom ) in review, to Nissan 350Z & Mazda RX-8!

Jeff Tamblyn wrote:

> besides which the 350z is plug ulgy if you ask me whereas the s2000 is quite
> attractive.
>


That is a matter of taste. I happen to like the S2000 and the 350Z, but
I HATE the RX8's design. Those considerations are purely subjective, and
they shouldn't influence the final decision too much. However, as I
noted in my previous post, the RX8 won in spite of being the slowest one
of the three.

I agree with Ted, in most reviews the winner is decided before a single
word is written.

Cosmin
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 13 Apr 2004, 05:22 pm
yessir
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: S2000 came 3rd ( bottom ) in review, to Nissan 350Z & Mazda RX-8 !

MotorTrend sucks!! Read Car And Driver !!!

http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=6846



"TE Cheah" <no@spam.biz> wrote in message news:407a2ff1_1@news.tm.net.my...
> http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ee/index1.html
>
>
>
>
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 13 Apr 2004, 06:08 pm
Adam Drew
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: S2000 came 3rd ( bottom ) in review, to Nissan 350Z & Mazda RX-8!

yessir wrote:
> MotorTrend sucks!! Read Car And Driver !!!
>
> http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=6846


Yeah, no kidding. MT gave their car of the year award to the **Chevy
Malibu** a few years ago. In their latest issue they printed probably
six letters lambasting them for choosing the Toyota Prius at this year's
COTY.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 13 Apr 2004, 06:38 pm
He Hate Retards
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: S2000 came 3rd ( bottom ) in review, to Nissan 350Z & Mazda RX-8

In terms of looks, 350Z blows away the S2k and RX.



How to turn off 'Maintenance Required" light:

1. Hold trip/reset button on dash
2. Turn key to "ON" or start engine
3. Hold button til light goes out

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Damage from Scratching Bottom huck Honda 3 3 15 Dec 2005 07:50 pm
Damage from Scratching Bottom klabu Honda 2 7 14 Dec 2005 05:40 pm
350Z run-in Kryptoknight Acura 8 28 Jun 2004 04:49 pm
S2000 came 3rd ( bottom ) in review, to Nissan 350Z & Mazda RX-8 ! TE Cheah Honda 2 9 20 Apr 2004 04:09 am
Re: Total-Boost.com : JDM ENGINES (Honda, Mazda, Nissan, Toyota,Subaru, Mitsubishi) Becker Honda 2 1 01 Dec 2003 03:32 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.