Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 3


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23 Nov 2003, 10:16 am
Forest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Blizzak tires?

Just wondering here; I recently bought 4 Bridgestone Blizzak tires mounted.
I'm aware of the reason for needing all 4 traction wise as opposed to just
front, (swapping ends and all.) What I was thinking was in order to save
some tread wear, is it ok to remove the front Blizzaks with the all year
tire and leave the rear on since the rear is being pulled (front wheel
drive) I don't see a risk of swapping ends. I'm thinking of this for between
snow falls. Am I nuts or what?

Thanks...


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23 Nov 2003, 01:02 pm
Gordon McGrew
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Blizzak tires?

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 15:16:06 GMT, "Forest" <forest@myhome.com> wrote:

>Just wondering here; I recently bought 4 Bridgestone Blizzak tires mounted.
>I'm aware of the reason for needing all 4 traction wise as opposed to just
>front, (swapping ends and all.) What I was thinking was in order to save
>some tread wear, is it ok to remove the front Blizzaks with the all year
>tire and leave the rear on since the rear is being pulled (front wheel
>drive) I don't see a risk of swapping ends. I'm thinking of this for between
>snow falls. Am I nuts or what?
>
>Thanks...


The first half of the Blizzak tread is a soft compound intended for
cold ice/snow traction. If you run it in hot weather, that layer will
quickly wear down to the harder compound beneath it. Then, when the
next season comes around they won't be good as winter tires. Not only
will the tread be too hard but the tread will lack the depth for snow.
Winter tires are no good for snow when about half the tread is gone.

The effect of having different tires front to back is somewhat
unpredictable. If your front tires have more grip under some
conditions, you could easily have a situation where the rear end
breaks loose before the front end and the end-swapping problem emerges
at the worst possible moment, i.e. emergency braking.

To me, one of the big benefits of using winter tires is that it allows
me to use summer tires in the summer. You should now have two sets of
rims, why don't you replace the all-season tires on the original rims
with something optimized for summer use.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23 Nov 2003, 01:50 pm
BrickMayson@mailcity.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Blizzak tires?

One reason the manufacture suggests 4 tires is the way 'winter
rubber' tires are constructed. As it has been explained to me,
snow tires have a deep lug type tread to increase traction and
rubber that remains more pliable in cold weather than regular AS
tires. Snow tires are best if one drive primarily on unplowed
snow. On the other hand if one drives mostly on plowed, icy
roads, then winter rubber tires are better. Winter rubber tires,
like the Blizzak, use soft rubber similar to a motorcycle tire on
the top 3/16" to 1/4" of the tread depth for increased traction
in colder weather and a more aggressive tread than regular tires
to do the job. The softer rubber wears off
in about 10 thousand miles or so. After that they are much like
a regular A/S tire and can be left on the vehicle. By using the
dual rubber compounds, rather than all soft rubber, the tire has
a life span more acceptable to the customer..


mike hunt



Forest wrote:
>
> Just wondering here; I recently bought 4 Bridgestone Blizzak tires mounted.
> I'm aware of the reason for needing all 4 traction wise as opposed to just
> front, (swapping ends and all.) What I was thinking was in order to save
> some tread wear, is it ok to remove the front Blizzaks with the all year
> tire and leave the rear on since the rear is being pulled (front wheel
> drive) I don't see a risk of swapping ends. I'm thinking of this for between
> snow falls. Am I nuts or what?
>
> Thanks...

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 23 Nov 2003, 04:05 pm
Forest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Blizzak tires?

I know all that. What I wanted to know is if there is any one sees a
problem with radials on the front and blizzaks on the rear for short
periods? I'm trying to save tread wear. I can't see a problem as the rear
just roll along on acceleration and justs drag on deceleration.

<BrickMayson@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:3FC0FF77.B0565F13@mailcity.com...
> One reason the manufacture suggests 4 tires is the way 'winter
> rubber' tires are constructed. As it has been explained to me,
> snow tires have a deep lug type tread to increase traction and
> rubber that remains more pliable in cold weather than regular AS
> tires. Snow tires are best if one drive primarily on unplowed
> snow. On the other hand if one drives mostly on plowed, icy
> roads, then winter rubber tires are better. Winter rubber tires,
> like the Blizzak, use soft rubber similar to a motorcycle tire on
> the top 3/16" to 1/4" of the tread depth for increased traction
> in colder weather and a more aggressive tread than regular tires
> to do the job. The softer rubber wears off
> in about 10 thousand miles or so. After that they are much like
> a regular A/S tire and can be left on the vehicle. By using the
> dual rubber compounds, rather than all soft rubber, the tire has
> a life span more acceptable to the customer..
>
>
> mike hunt
>
>
>
> Forest wrote:
> >
> > Just wondering here; I recently bought 4 Bridgestone Blizzak tires

mounted.
> > I'm aware of the reason for needing all 4 traction wise as opposed to

just
> > front, (swapping ends and all.) What I was thinking was in order to save
> > some tread wear, is it ok to remove the front Blizzaks with the all year
> > tire and leave the rear on since the rear is being pulled (front wheel
> > drive) I don't see a risk of swapping ends. I'm thinking of this for

between
> > snow falls. Am I nuts or what?
> >
> > Thanks...



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 23 Nov 2003, 04:13 pm
Stephen Bigelow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Blizzak tires?


"Forest" <forest@myhome.com> wrote in message
news:9i9wb.18821$Wy4.17565@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> I know all that. What I wanted to know is if there is any one sees a
> problem with radials on the front and blizzaks on the rear for short
> periods? I'm trying to save tread wear. I can't see a problem as the

rear
> just roll along on acceleration and justs drag on deceleration.


And during cornering?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 23 Nov 2003, 04:34 pm
Forest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Blizzak tires?

Ahh, that's why I posted; I overlooked that possible problem. Do you think
that would be much of a problem; we're talking dry blacktop here. Maybe I
should just put the Blizzaks on a day or two before the first snow/ice storm
and leave em till the spring. Just figuring a way to maximizes tread life;
perhaps I'm getting a tad anal about it.

"Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:1q9wb.7946$Fv8.1638@twister01.bloor.is.net.ca ble.rogers.com...
>
> "Forest" <forest@myhome.com> wrote in message
> news:9i9wb.18821$Wy4.17565@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > I know all that. What I wanted to know is if there is any one sees a
> > problem with radials on the front and blizzaks on the rear for short
> > periods? I'm trying to save tread wear. I can't see a problem as the

> rear
> > just roll along on acceleration and justs drag on deceleration.

>
> And during cornering?
>
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 23 Nov 2003, 06:47 pm
VelociRacer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Blizzak tires?

Forest wrote:
>
> Ahh, that's why I posted; I overlooked that possible problem. Do you think
> that would be much of a problem; we're talking dry blacktop here. Maybe I
> should just put the Blizzaks on a day or two before the first snow/ice storm
> and leave em till the spring. Just figuring a way to maximizes tread life;
> perhaps I'm getting a tad anal about it.
>
> "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:1q9wb.7946$Fv8.1638@twister01.bloor.is.net.ca ble.rogers.com...
> >
> > "Forest" <forest@myhome.com> wrote in message
> > news:9i9wb.18821$Wy4.17565@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > > I know all that. What I wanted to know is if there is any one sees a
> > > problem with radials on the front and blizzaks on the rear for short
> > > periods? I'm trying to save tread wear. I can't see a problem as the

> > rear
> > > just roll along on acceleration and justs drag on deceleration.

> >
> > And during cornering?
> >
> >


Go ahead and enjoy the grip of your newly acquired Blizzaks on all 4
corners. Don't be concerned about longevity. Your safety is paramount.
Next time, may I suggest a set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta Q (a.k.a. Hakka
Q) for winter tires? They outlast the Blizzaks by several fold. Every
bit as good on snow+ice, even better in the dry.

http://www.nokiantires.com/newsite/home.cfm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 23 Nov 2003, 06:58 pm
Forest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Blizzak tires?

Will do. Thanks...

"VelociRacer" <VelociRacer@ThePodium.com> wrote in message
news:3FC146F4.AA664F4B@ThePodium.com...
> Forest wrote:
> >
> > Ahh, that's why I posted; I overlooked that possible problem. Do you

think
> > that would be much of a problem; we're talking dry blacktop here. Maybe

I
> > should just put the Blizzaks on a day or two before the first snow/ice

storm
> > and leave em till the spring. Just figuring a way to maximizes tread

life;
> > perhaps I'm getting a tad anal about it.
> >
> > "Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelowPOV@rogers.com> wrote in message
> > news:1q9wb.7946$Fv8.1638@twister01.bloor.is.net.ca ble.rogers.com...
> > >
> > > "Forest" <forest@myhome.com> wrote in message
> > > news:9i9wb.18821$Wy4.17565@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > > > I know all that. What I wanted to know is if there is any one sees

a
> > > > problem with radials on the front and blizzaks on the rear for short
> > > > periods? I'm trying to save tread wear. I can't see a problem as

the
> > > rear
> > > > just roll along on acceleration and justs drag on deceleration.
> > >
> > > And during cornering?
> > >
> > >

>
> Go ahead and enjoy the grip of your newly acquired Blizzaks on all 4
> corners. Don't be concerned about longevity. Your safety is paramount.
> Next time, may I suggest a set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta Q (a.k.a. Hakka
> Q) for winter tires? They outlast the Blizzaks by several fold. Every
> bit as good on snow+ice, even better in the dry.
>
> http://www.nokiantires.com/newsite/home.cfm



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 24 Nov 2003, 08:12 am
NetSock
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Blizzak tires?

<BrickMayson@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:3FC0FF77.B0565F13@mailcity.com...
> One reason the manufacture suggests 4 tires is the way 'winter
> rubber' tires are constructed.


Oh really idiot? Tell us what that is.

> As it has been explained to me,


By who?

> snow tires have a deep lug type tread to increase traction and
> rubber that remains more pliable in cold weather than regular AS
> tires.


No shit...your a damn genius!

> Snow tires are best if one drive primarily on unplowed
> snow.


OMG! My heads going to explode!

>On the other hand if one drives mostly on plowed, icy
> roads, then winter rubber tires are better. Winter rubber tires,
> like the Blizzak, use soft rubber similar to a motorcycle tire on
> the top 3/16" to 1/4" of the tread depth for increased traction
> in colder weather and a more aggressive tread than regular tires
> to do the job.


Man oh man oh man...what did all of us ignorant unintelligent Neanderthals
do before Mikeys great wisdom and advise?

> The softer rubber wears off
> in about 10 thousand miles or so.


Bullshit. More crap from your ass.

> After that they are much like
> a regular A/S tire and can be left on the vehicle. By using the
> dual rubber compounds, rather than all soft rubber, the tire has
> a life span more acceptable to the customer..


Are your eyes brown?
>
>
> mike hunt, your local village idiot.



--
'03 S2000
'94 Accord

It's just about going fast...that's all...

http://home.insight.rr.com/cgreen/



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 24 Nov 2003, 06:06 pm
StonyRhoades@mailcity.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Blizzak tires?

I have been driveling Mustang GT convertibles since '99 here
in the mountains of PA and NY, I'm on my third. I use Blizzak on
the rear only, no problem. I let them on year 'round then buy
another two in November, $450 a pair installed. I use
Vredasteins (S?,) on the rear only on my RWD Lincoln LS as well,
no problem. I believe they are made in Holland and they are much
better on ice than the Blizzak but they don't make a 245/45Z17,
so I have to buy the Jap tires for the GT. Blizzak ARE radials
tires.


mike hunt



Forest wrote:
>
> I know all that. What I wanted to know is if there is any one sees a
> problem with radials on the front and blizzaks on the rear for short
> periods? I'm trying to save tread wear. I can't see a problem as the rear
> just roll along on acceleration and justs drag on deceleration.
>
> <BrickMayson@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:3FC0FF77.B0565F13@mailcity.com...
> > One reason the manufacture suggests 4 tires is the way 'winter
> > rubber' tires are constructed. As it has been explained to me,
> > snow tires have a deep lug type tread to increase traction and
> > rubber that remains more pliable in cold weather than regular AS
> > tires. Snow tires are best if one drive primarily on unplowed
> > snow. On the other hand if one drives mostly on plowed, icy
> > roads, then winter rubber tires are better. Winter rubber tires,
> > like the Blizzak, use soft rubber similar to a motorcycle tire on
> > the top 3/16" to 1/4" of the tread depth for increased traction
> > in colder weather and a more aggressive tread than regular tires
> > to do the job. The softer rubber wears off
> > in about 10 thousand miles or so. After that they are much like
> > a regular A/S tire and can be left on the vehicle. By using the
> > dual rubber compounds, rather than all soft rubber, the tire has
> > a life span more acceptable to the customer..
> >
> >
> > mike hunt
> >
> >
> >
> > Forest wrote:
> > >
> > > Just wondering here; I recently bought 4 Bridgestone Blizzak tires

> mounted.
> > > I'm aware of the reason for needing all 4 traction wise as opposed to

> just
> > > front, (swapping ends and all.) What I was thinking was in order to save
> > > some tread wear, is it ok to remove the front Blizzaks with the all year
> > > tire and leave the rear on since the rear is being pulled (front wheel
> > > drive) I don't see a risk of swapping ends. I'm thinking of this for

> between
> > > snow falls. Am I nuts or what?
> > >
> > > Thanks...

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quiet tires=soft tires? Frank Honda 3 8 16 Mar 2005 02:40 pm
Snow Tires - Blizzak versus X-Ice ?? Paul Honda 2 10 25 Nov 2004 11:27 pm
Bridgestone Blizzak WS-50 versus Michelin X-ICE Winter Tires John Navage Honda 3 2 19 Nov 2004 08:37 am
Bridgestone Blizzak WS-50 versus Michelin X-ICE Winter Tires John Navage Acura 1 18 Nov 2004 08:57 pm
Need new tires KcN Acura 2 27 Jan 2004 09:28 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.