Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||
|
This just doesn't seem normal. I have an '02 Accord. Replaced brake pads at 10,905 miles, had to cut down warped rotors and replace pads at 25,080 miles, and just yesterday at 39,457 miles had to replace the pads and have the warped rotors replaced (too thin to cut again). Service manager said it was normal. Right! This doesn't seem like normal wear and tear. Comments please!
|
|
|||
|
No. I had a 99 LX with 30k on it and no brake pad replacement. My 01
Prelude went through the 30k check -- no brake pads. Dealer tells me they will likely make it to 60k. "Tom" <tfirchow@rcn.com> wrote in message news:a9b4588e38933f53e95ecdd8ec05d919@localhost.ta lkaboutautos.com... > This just doesn't seem normal. I have an '02 Accord. Replaced brake pads at 10,905 miles, had to cut down warped rotors and replace pads at 25,080 miles, and just yesterday at 39,457 miles had to replace the pads and have the warped rotors replaced (too thin to cut again). Service manager said it was normal. Right! This doesn't seem like normal wear and tear. Comments please! > |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:14:25 -0600, "Tom" <tfirchow@rcn.com> wrote:
>This just doesn't seem normal. I have an '02 Accord. Replaced brake pads at 10,905 miles, Why? If they were worn out at that milage, something is wrong. > had to cut down warped rotors and replace pads at 25,080 miles, A waste of time and money. Never turn Honda rotors. If they're bad, replace them. > and just yesterday at 39,457 miles had to replace the pads and have the warped rotors replaced (too thin to cut again). Too thin to cut in the first place. >Service manager said it was normal. Right! This doesn't seem like normal wear and tear. >Comments please! You can go two ways. The first is to buy cheapo rotors and pads and replace them often. Do it yourself, it's not that hard. The second way is to buy top quality aftermarket rotors and pads. What usage do your brakes get? Do you drive steep mountain roads? Do you charge stopsigns like an angry bull? Do you drive in salt-laden slush? And stay away from dealers. Find a good independent mechanic who owns his own shop, in as obscure a location as possible. Somebody who has to do good work because he gets no walk-in business. Go to dealers for parts and warranty work only. |
|
|||
|
Honda is clearly not at Toyota level, regarding brakes.
My Accord 99 had a few issues regarding brakes. In 70000 miles, I am on my third set of front/read pads. Never changed a rotor, though. Last set of front pads (OEM Honda) lasted only 22000 miles. Now I am trying el cheap organic pads at a third of Honda price. Being softer, chances are that it will save my rotor for a while. I always felt a slight pulsation when braking from 50mph. Not unbearable. My last set of rear pads seem to tough longer this time. Where the pads are installed on the galiber, there are two copper shims (up and down). Make sure that they are cleaned and lubed. I suspect this to be the reason why my rear brakes are doing so well. Also check is the wheel is really free and can be turned easily by hand. It was mentionned to never cut rotor because it is a waste of time; this is my opinion as well. Replace them if they vibrate too much. "Tom" <tfirchow@rcn.com> wrote in message news:a9b4588e38933f53e95ecdd8ec05d919@localhost.ta lkaboutautos.com... > This just doesn't seem normal. I have an '02 Accord. Replaced brake pads at 10,905 miles, had to cut down warped rotors and replace pads at 25,080 miles, and just yesterday at 39,457 miles had to replace the pads and have the warped rotors replaced (too thin to cut again). Service manager said it was normal. Right! This doesn't seem like normal wear and tear. Comments please! > |
|
|||
|
I would have the REAR brakes checked for proper operation.
Especially if you are noticing a the big difference in the amount of brake dust accumulating on your front wheels, compared to the rear. Often we find front rotor problems can be attributed to the rears not being properly adjusted, particularly if the vehicle is assembled with rear drum brakes, resulting in the front brakes doing more than their share of the work and over heating. During routine service intervals we make it a point to always adjust the brakes, which has helped reduce that problem. mike hunt Tom wrote: > > This just doesn't seem normal. I have an '02 Accord. Replaced brake pads at 10,905 miles, had to cut down warped rotors and replace pads at 25,080 miles, and just yesterday at 39,457 miles had to replace the pads and have the warped rotors replaced (too thin to cut again). Service manager said it was normal. Right! This doesn't seem like normal wear and tear. Comments please! |
|
|||
|
Had the same problem on my 99 Prelude. My local dealership told me I
must drive my car pretty hard (perhaps...). Anyway, after speaking to a few mechanics, one thing they all commented on is that the break-in period of new brakes is important and that when taking off/putting back on wheels, the lugs should always be hand torqued (use a torque wrench). Notice that most shops (including Honda dealerships) will use their air gun to torque the lug on (NOT GOOD). Torquing the lug by hand ensure that you don't apply excessive force and that you apply even force on all the lugs (and therefore on the whole disk). BTW. I believe that most Honda's require 80 ft/lb for the lugs. Check your owner's manual. Tom wrote: > This just doesn't seem normal. I have an '02 Accord. Replaced brake pads at 10,905 miles, had to cut down warped rotors and replace pads at 25,080 miles, and just yesterday at 39,457 miles had to replace the pads and have the warped rotors replaced (too thin to cut again). Service manager said it was normal. Right! This doesn't seem like normal wear and tear. Comments please! > |
|
|||
|
MajorDomo@mailcity.com quoth thusly in
news:3FBBC34A.E2A32206@mailcity.com: > I would have the REAR brakes checked for proper operation. > Especially if you are noticing a the big difference in the amount > of brake dust accumulating on your front wheels, compared to the > rear. This is nonsense. Front brakes on ANY car will generate the bulk of the stopping power. Some vehicles, particularly German RWD ones, will generate substantially more front brake dust than rear, and that's with the brakes operating correctly. > Often we find front rotor problems can be attributed to > the rears not being properly adjusted, particularly if the > vehicle is assembled with rear drum brakes, resulting in the > front brakes doing more than their share of the work and over > heating. During routine service intervals we make it a point to > always adjust the brakes, which has helped reduce that problem. So you pull the handbrake up and down a few times. Big deal. Front rotor problems are mainly due to these factors: 1) Repeated aggressive braking 2) Aftermarket pads too hard 3) Seized pads 4) Seized calipers 5) Seized pistons 6) Rotors with insufficient heat-sink mass due to machining or design 7) Combination of the above. -- TeGGeR® |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:28:36 GMT, "Tegger®"
<teggeratistopdotcom@changetheobvious.invalid> wrote: >> I would have the REAR brakes checked for proper operation. >> Especially if you are noticing a the big difference in the amount >> of brake dust accumulating on your front wheels, compared to the >> rear. > > >This is nonsense. Front brakes on ANY car will generate the bulk of the >stopping power. I'm inclined to agree. The rear discs on my GSR can hardly beat their way out of a paper bag, figuratively speaking. >Front rotor problems are mainly due to these factors: >1) Repeated aggressive braking >2) Aftermarket pads too hard >3) Seized pads >4) Seized calipers >5) Seized pistons >6) Rotors with insufficient heat-sink mass due to machining or design >7) Combination of the above. I would also add to your list the make-a-buck practice of persuading drivers that their rotors need turning when they damn well don't! But do you not subscribe to the 'overtorquing of lugnuts with an impact wrench' theory that one hears? Someone in a newsgroup challenged me on that one a while back and I hope to get around to some experiments with a dial guage one of these days to see if that's just an automotive urban legend. Your thoughts? |
|
|||
|
John Ings <nodamned@spam.org> quoth thusly in
news:s77prvg3aeced01qh5ujrnrc76sccbqoa8@4ax.com: > > I would also add to your list the make-a-buck practice of persuading > drivers that their rotors need turning when they damn well don't! Can you say "Midas"? > > But do you not subscribe to the 'overtorquing of lugnuts with an > impact wrench' theory that one hears? Someone in a newsgroup > challenged me on that one a while back and I hope to get around to > some experiments with a dial guage one of these days to see if that's > just an automotive urban legend. I'm sure some cars are prone to this, but it would have to be due to the design of the rotor and hub. Hondas are not among them. Every time I get the car back from the dealer, and they've had the wheels off for whatever reason, the nut torque is all over the place. Some I practically have to stand on the wrench to crack them loose, others spin with the lightest push. The nuts have been left like that for extended periods. My rotors are not warped. Our new '99 Tercel suffers from the same fate. When we got the car, all the nuts were all over the place as well, and that car's brakes are smoother than mine. So no, I do not subscribe to that theory. -- TeGGeR® |
|
|||
|
Tom wrote:
> This just doesn't seem normal. I have an '02 Accord. Replaced brake pads at 10,905 miles, had to cut down warped rotors and replace pads at 25,080 miles, and just yesterday at 39,457 miles had to replace the pads and have the warped rotors replaced (too thin to cut again). Service manager said it was normal. Right! This doesn't seem like normal wear and tear. Comments please! > That does seem really often to me. A couple quick questions. Do you drive city or racing miles or is this on the highway? Are you having the work done by a dealer? I don't know if this helps but I just had my water pump replaced on my 93 civic. Suprise suprise, while they were under there they noticed that my pads needed replacing and my rotors needed turning. Of course at 150K miles the pads probably did need replacing by I did that my self and didn't worry about the rotor. Still works great. If you're going to a dealer it may be that is just the standard "repair" they suggest on all cars that come in for service. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Warped Rotors(again) | Cherokee | Honda 2 | 5 | 29 Apr 2006 09:50 pm |
| Warped Rotors? | James Silva | Honda 3 | 5 | 06 Jan 2004 08:15 pm |
| 95 Accord - 3 sets of warped rotors. | Philip | Honda 3 | 1 | 17 Oct 2003 07:57 am |
| WTF!?!?! Rotors warped again! | Gabriel Afana | Acura | 8 | 16 Oct 2003 12:14 pm |