Honda Car Forum | ![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello,
I read a lot of posts about the Honda's AT but I did not find an answer if this is normal: 1. Several week ago I bough 1995 Accord LX with 82 000 miles driven by a old lady. All maintenance was done at the dealership according to the schedule. The car runs perfect except a small thing: When I put the car in Direct (from neutral or park) I feel that the transmission engages once (a small "push"), then 1.5-2 second later I feel a second "push" and then I can drive. Sometimes the second push is not noticeable. But most of the times I'll have to wait for the second push to drive (which is around 2.5 secs). Other then that the tranny shifts perfectly fine and my mechanic said it shifts actually a lot smoother then most 92-97 accords. Is my transmission double-engaging normal? Thanks |
|
|||
|
If the tranny does not engage as soon aa you place the selector
in drive, something is not right. I would take the vehicle back to the dealer and have it annualized and the defect corrected before any further damage occurs, if it were me. mike hunt Pete wrote: > > Hello, > > I read a lot of posts about the Honda's AT but I did not find an > answer if this is normal: > > 1. Several week ago I bough 1995 Accord LX with 82 000 miles driven by > a old lady. All maintenance was done at the dealership according to > the schedule. > > The car runs perfect except a small thing: When I put the car in > Direct (from neutral or park) I feel that the transmission engages > once (a small "push"), then 1.5-2 second later I feel a second "push" > and then I can drive. Sometimes the second push is not noticeable. But > most of the times I'll have to wait for the second push to drive > (which > is around 2.5 secs). Other then that the tranny shifts perfectly fine > and my mechanic said it shifts actually a lot smoother then most 92-97 > accords. > > Is my transmission double-engaging normal? > > Thanks |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 01:23:46 GMT, MikeHunt2@mailcity.com wrote:
>If the tranny does not engage as soon aa you place the selector >in drive, something is not right. I would take the vehicle back >to the dealer and have it annualized and the defect corrected >before any further damage occurs, if it were me. Sounds kinda drastic to me. Is this "annualize" thing something you learned as a "design engineer"?:-P Rgds, George Macdonald "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me?? |
|
|||
|
Yes. My 99 Accord does the same thing. I thought this was a design feature
to soften the engagement. "Pete" <peter@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:320llvchej60fvn1jin5l8bu4j2gk8008p@4ax.com... > Hello, > > I read a lot of posts about the Honda's AT but I did not find an > answer if this is normal: > > 1. Several week ago I bough 1995 Accord LX with 82 000 miles driven by > a old lady. All maintenance was done at the dealership according to > the schedule. > > The car runs perfect except a small thing: When I put the car in > Direct (from neutral or park) I feel that the transmission engages > once (a small "push"), then 1.5-2 second later I feel a second "push" > and then I can drive. Sometimes the second push is not noticeable. But > most of the times I'll have to wait for the second push to drive > (which > is around 2.5 secs). Other then that the tranny shifts perfectly fine > and my mechanic said it shifts actually a lot smoother then most 92-97 > accords. > > Is my transmission double-engaging normal? > > Thanks > > |
|
|||
|
"<>" <nospam@all.com> wrote in message news:8qI6b.380310$YN5.253190@sccrnsc01... > Yes. My 99 Accord does the same thing. I thought this was a design feature > to soften the engagement. This is true (my 91 does the same), remember the Honda auto box is unique in that it does not use a planetary gearset, it is more like a computer controlled maual box. Hence firmer shifts than other makes, but also a more sporty feel and less power loss. --- Outgoing mail has been virus checked Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 01/09/2003 |
|
|||
|
No, something my automatic spell checker assumed I meant
to print I suppose. If I miss type and the spell checker wants to use another word that fine with me, I don't have time to proofread. Un any event my degree is in metallurgy, not English LOL mike hunt George McDonald's wrote: > > On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 01:23:46 GMT, MikeHunt2@mailcity.com wrote: > > >If the tranny does not engage as soon aa you place the selector > >in drive, something is not right. I would take the vehicle back > >to the dealer and have it annualized and the defect corrected > >before any further damage occurs, if it were me. > > Sounds kinda drastic to me. Is this "annualize" thing something you > learned as a "design engineer"?:-P > > Rgds, George Macdonald > > "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me?? |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 23:06:57 GMT, MikeHunt2@mailcity.com wrote:
>No, something my automatic spell checker assumed I meant >to print I suppose. If I miss type and the spell checker >wants to use another word that fine with me, I don't have >time to proofread. Un any event my degree is in metallurgy, >not English LOL Hmph - sounds like you're as good with computers/software as you are with cars. > > >George McDonald's wrote: >> >> On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 01:23:46 GMT, MikeHunt2@mailcity.com wrote: >> >> >If the tranny does not engage as soon aa you place the selector >> >in drive, something is not right. I would take the vehicle back >> >to the dealer and have it annualized and the defect corrected >> >before any further damage occurs, if it were me. >> >> Sounds kinda drastic to me. Is this "annualize" thing something you >> learned as a "design engineer"?:-P Rgds, George Macdonald "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me?? |
|
|||
|
<MikeHunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:3F5A86F0.694B0D10@mailcity.com... > If the tranny does not engage as soon aa you place the selector > in drive, something is not right. Bwaaaaaaahahahahahahaha You should be a mechanic Mike...you sure nailed that problem! ROTFL! Still waiting dipstick... |
|
|||
|
<MikeHunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:3F5BB865.CE4AEA68@mailcity.com... > No, something my automatic spell checker assumed I meant > to print I suppose. If I miss type and the spell checker > wants to use another word that fine with me, I don't have > time to proofread. That's oblivious...but not only for spelling reason either. > Un any event my degree is in metallurgy, > not English LOL Talk to your middle school guidance counselor about getting an English class added to your schedule. |
|
|||
|
Pete <peter@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<320llvchej60fvn1jin5l8bu4j2gk8008p@4ax.com>. ..
> Hello, > > I read a lot of posts about the Honda's AT but I did not find an > answer if this is normal: > > 1. Several week ago I bough 1995 Accord LX with 82 000 miles driven by > a old lady. All maintenance was done at the dealership according to > the schedule. > > The car runs perfect except a small thing: When I put the car in > Direct (from neutral or park) I feel that the transmission engages > once (a small "push"), then 1.5-2 second later I feel a second "push" > and then I can drive. Sometimes the second push is not noticeable. But > most of the times I'll have to wait for the second push to drive > (which > is around 2.5 secs). Other then that the tranny shifts perfectly fine > and my mechanic said it shifts actually a lot smoother then most 92-97 > accords. > > Is my transmission double-engaging normal? > > Thanks For what it is worth, I have the same thing on a 2003 EX v6 w/Navi -- Well folks, I just went to the dealer to pick up my car, which I dropped off yesterday for it's first oil change and some rattles. I also asked them to check the tranny because it took a bit to engage into drive from P, R or N (1 2 second delay to engage D). No biggie, I thought... I was hoping that they would say that this is normal.....been like this from day #1 Nope, "Re manufactured Transmission" has been ordered. Service told me that this is not "normal". They also told me that they have replaced transmissions on other '03's. I didn't ask for details but I did want to let you all know because I have seen posts on these boards with this same symptom. Question: They tell me that a "Re manufactured Transmission" is not a "re built transmission" because ALL the innards are new (perhaps used casing) and it's not assembled in an assembly line, but rather by humans at Honda motors... Is this true? I also demanded a new torque converter.. they told me that Honda only sends them as together to eliminate contamination concerns. Does anyone have the facts on these two items? Anyone out there work or have worked in Service? Lastly, has anyone had a tranny replaced before? If so, what everything right after that major repair (alignment, rattles, no damage, etc.) They tell me that the car will not need wheel alignment. Can anyone confirm that? Sorry for the long post, but given all the tranny issues and questions, I thought the replies to this one would be helpful for others as well. Thanks! |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2003 Honda Accord V6 coupe automatic transmission slipping problem | jerry114@gmail.com | Honda 3 | 1 | 09 Nov 2006 07:01 pm |
| 1999 honda accord automatic transmission problem | meake | Honda 3 | 5 | 17 Dec 2004 10:45 am |
| 1999 Honda Accord V4 Automatic Transmission problem / failure | Triny | Honda 3 | 8 | 08 Jul 2004 12:31 pm |
| 92 Honda Accord transmission (automatic) | Percy G | Honda 2 | 0 | 09 May 2004 09:52 am |
| Accord 95 automatic transmission double engaging | Pete | Honda 2 | 2 | 09 Sep 2003 01:49 pm |