Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Actual experience has shown that ABS does not prevent any less accidents,
instead it has shown that people expect ABS to do things beyond the ordinary capability of normal breaking. I have a Civic and CR-V, neither has ABS.....and I don't feel any need for it. Its your choice and your money and you could be short changing yourself by being narrow minded. "Jason Hsu" <jason_hsu@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:f7d9a152.0309020907.6d523836@posting.google.c om... > I was thinking of buying a new car in 1-2 years. Since my 1988 Honda > Civic has been and still is a good car, the most logical choice for me > would be a new Honda Civic. > > But I noticed that the new Honda Civics only offer ABS on the > top-of-the-line models. It's not even an option on the base or > mid-level model. What gives? ABS is not an exotic new technology. > It's been widespread for years. I'm not paying $14K for a car that > lacks ABS. The top-of-the-line Honda Civic starts at something like > $17K! > > I would consider a new Toyota Corolla, which offers ABS on all models. > But from what I've heard, it's hard to come by on the base models. > And the Nissan Sentra is like the Honda Civic - no ABS even as an > option on the base model. > > What gives? I'm not paying $14K or more for a car that lacks ABS. I > can't believe skinflint manufacturers think a few hundred dollars more > on a $14K car for a safety feature is exorbitant. Come on, I'd rather > skimp on the sunroof, leather-wrapped steering wheel, power door > locks, power windows, remote keyless entry, cruise control, etc. But > I'm not about to skimp on safety when buying a new car. > > Given all this, a used Buick seems like a better deal. ABS has been > standard on Buicks for years, and a few of them are on the Consumer > Reports recommended used car list. Due to rapid depreciation, I > should be able to buy a 4-to-6-year-old Buick Century, Regal, or > LeSabre for 4 figures (instead of 5) AND have ABS. I'm willing to > sacrifice a few mpg and image in favor of more economy and safety. > > If I buy the used Buick (or Ford Escort, Ford Crown Victoria, or > Mercury Grand Marquis), I will write Honda, Toyota, and Nissan to tell > them that they lost a sale because they were too cheap to add ABS to a > $14K car. > > Jason Hsu, AG4DG > usenet@@@@@@jasonhsu.com |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Why don't base Honda Civics have ABS? | Mista Bone | Honda 3 | 2 | 10 Sep 2003 10:37 pm |
| Re: Why don't base Honda Civics have ABS? | Jason Hsu | Honda 3 | 13 | 07 Sep 2003 06:46 am |
| Re: Why don't base Honda Civics have ABS? | Sean | Honda 3 | 1 | 04 Sep 2003 06:43 am |
| Re: Why don't base Honda Civics have ABS? | Jafir Elkurd | Honda 3 | 0 | 02 Sep 2003 09:08 pm |
| Re: Why don't base Honda Civics have ABS? | DrPimpDadi | Honda 3 | 1 | 02 Sep 2003 01:05 pm |