Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 15 May 2005, 09:36 am
wlw-19958
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Burnt Valve in 1994 Accord F22B2

Hi There,

New here. I would like to ask a question about what I found on my
1994 Accord when I checked out an idling problem. I found out I had
Zero compression in No: 4 and 180 to 187 psi in all the others. I
pulled the head and found one valve that was severely burnt. All the
other valves look fine The valves in No: 4 have significantly more
deposites on them than the other three chambers do. Only one of the
valves (exhaust) in No: 4 burnt (and boy, did it ever burn). The
other exhaust valve in No: 4 has deposits about equal to the burnt
valve. The valves in No: 1 - 3 are all clean (well, stained but
virtually no deposites at all). I checked the valve-to-guide
clearance on the burt one and it is within specs. The valve stem is
within specs for a new valve (well above "service" limit).

So, my question is: "why did this valve burn?" Was it:

* Improper valve adjustment,
* Intake gasket leak,
* Problem with the fuel injector,
* Defective valve, or
* Something else I can’t think of.

To give you some background, This is a F22B2 SOHC (non-VTEC) motor
with about 100,000+ miles (I can’t remember the exact mileage right
now). The timing belt was replaced roughly 10,000 miles earlier and
the valves were adjusted.

My first reaction is that the valve adjustment is to blame but I
checked the adjustments at least twice. Yes, the engine was cool
(room temperature). It had been up on jacks for a week waiting for
parts.

I wonder about the deposits on the exhaust valves in No: 4. Why would
this be the only cylinder to exibit them? Did they develop before or
after the valve burnt? If before, this would be a reason for the
valve burning out. But is still begs the question as to Why just this
one cylinder is developing deposits?

What do you folks think?

-Blue Chips-
Webb

--
Posted using the http://www.autoforumz.com interface, at author's request
Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards
Topic URL: http://www.autoforumz.com/Honda-Burn...ict119921.html
Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.autoforumz.com/eform.php?p=582601
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15 May 2005, 09:58 am
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Burnt Valve in 1994 Accord F22B2

wlw-19958 wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> New here. I would like to ask a question about what I found on my
> 1994 Accord when I checked out an idling problem. I found out I had
> Zero compression in No: 4 and 180 to 187 psi in all the others. I
> pulled the head and found one valve that was severely burnt. All the
> other valves look fine The valves in No: 4 have significantly more
> deposites on them than the other three chambers do. Only one of the
> valves (exhaust) in No: 4 burnt (and boy, did it ever burn). The
> other exhaust valve in No: 4 has deposits about equal to the burnt
> valve. The valves in No: 1 - 3 are all clean (well, stained but
> virtually no deposites at all). I checked the valve-to-guide
> clearance on the burt one and it is within specs. The valve stem is
> within specs for a new valve (well above "service" limit).
>
> So, my question is: "why did this valve burn?" Was it:
>
> * Improper valve adjustment,


common.

> * Intake gasket leak,


definitely not.

> * Problem with the fuel injector,


definitely not.

> * Defective valve, or


possibly, but rare.

> * Something else I can’t think of.


if the valve set gets damaged in some way, [think gunk falling into the
cylinder from a plug change, or a plug insulator nose fracturing &
falling into the cylinder - these pieces can get trapped under a valve
head, score the surface and initiate minor leakage.] the leakage will
initiate "burn". it starts slow but accelerates from there.

>
> To give you some background, This is a F22B2 SOHC (non-VTEC) motor
> with about 100,000+ miles (I can’t remember the exact mileage right
> now). The timing belt was replaced roughly 10,000 miles earlier and
> the valves were adjusted.
>
> My first reaction is that the valve adjustment is to blame but I
> checked the adjustments at least twice. Yes, the engine was cool
> (room temperature). It had been up on jacks for a week waiting for
> parts.
>
> I wonder about the deposits on the exhaust valves in No: 4. Why would
> this be the only cylinder to exibit them? Did they develop before or
> after the valve burnt? If before, this would be a reason for the
> valve burning out. But is still begs the question as to Why just this
> one cylinder is developing deposits?
>
> What do you folks think?
>
> -Blue Chips-
> Webb


deposits are because without proper compression, you're getting
insufficient combustion to heat the components enough to clean them.
when you replace the valve & run the car normally, the deposits won't
return.

be aware that this vehicle may fail smog next time around - if too much
unburnt fuel's been reaching the catalyst, it may have burnt out. but
address the valve issue first & see how it turns out.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 16 May 2005, 04:36 pm
wlw-19958
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: Burnt Valve in 1994 Accord F22B2

"jim beam1" wrote:
> wlw-19958 wrote:
> > Hi There,
> >
> > New here. I would like to ask a question about what I found

> on my
> > 1994 Accord when I checked out an idling problem. I found

> out I had
> > Zero compression in No: 4 and 180 to 187 psi in all the

> others. I
> > pulled the head and found one valve that was severely burnt.

> All the
> > other valves look fine The valves in No: 4 have

> significantly more
> > deposites on them than the other three chambers do. Only

> one of the
> > valves (exhaust) in No: 4 burnt (and boy, did it ever burn).

> The
> > other exhaust valve in No: 4 has deposits about equal to the

> burnt
> > valve. The valves in No: 1 - 3 are all clean (well, stained

> but
> > virtually no deposites at all). I checked the

> valve-to-guide
> > clearance on the burt one and it is within specs. The valve

> stem is
> > within specs for a new valve (well above "service" limit).
> >
> > So, my question is: "why did this valve burn?" Was it:
> >
> > * Improper valve adjustment,

>
> common.
>
> > * Intake gasket leak,

>
> definitely not.
>
> > * Problem with the fuel injector,

>
> definitely not.
>
> > * Defective valve, or

>
> possibly, but rare.
>
> > * Something else I can’t think of.

>
> if the valve set gets damaged in some way, [think gunk falling
> into the
> cylinder from a plug change, or a plug insulator nose
> fracturing &
> falling into the cylinder - these pieces can get trapped under
> a valve
> head, score the surface and initiate minor leakage.] the
> leakage will
> initiate "burn". it starts slow but accelerates from there.
>
> >
> > To give you some background, This is a F22B2 SOHC (non-VTEC)

> motor
> > with about 100,000+ miles (I can’t remember the exact

> mileage right
> > now). The timing belt was replaced roughly 10,000 miles

> earlier and
> > the valves were adjusted.
> >
> > My first reaction is that the valve adjustment is to blame

> but I
> > checked the adjustments at least twice. Yes, the engine was

> cool
> > (room temperature). It had been up on jacks for a week

> waiting for
> > parts.
> >
> > I wonder about the deposits on the exhaust valves in No: 4.

> Why would
> > this be the only cylinder to exibit them? Did they develop

> before or
> > after the valve burnt? If before, this would be a reason

> for the
> > valve burning out. But is still begs the question as to Why

> just this
> > one cylinder is developing deposits?
> >
> > What do you folks think?
> >
> > -Blue Chips-
> > Webb

>
> deposits are because without proper compression, you're
> getting
> insufficient combustion to heat the components enough to clean
> them.
> when you replace the valve & run the car normally, the
> deposits won't
> return.
>
> be aware that this vehicle may fail smog next time around - if
> too much
> unburnt fuel's been reaching the catalyst, it may have burnt
> out. but
> address the valve issue first & see how it turns out.


Hi There,

Thanks for the information. I suspected that it was the adjustment.
I did the adjustment durring winter and the car was in outside. Could
the colder temperatures affected the adjustment? Should I have added
more clearance to compensate for the colder conditions I was working
under?

Thanks!
-Blue Chips-
Webb

--
Posted using the http://www.autoforumz.com interface, at author's request
Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards
Topic URL: http://www.autoforumz.com/Honda-Burn...ict119921.html
Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.autoforumz.com/eform.php?p=585381
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1994 Integra: Bad Valve Adjustment? arock Honda 2 15 13 Jul 2006 08:39 pm
my 1994 accord lx ex? e@e.e Honda 2 3 10 Jun 2005 05:54 pm
CRV Burnt Valve Saga ?? Stempis Rhubank Honda 3 9 22 Oct 2003 07:51 pm
Re: 1999 Prelude and burnt Oil levittd Honda 2 0 25 Jun 2003 11:25 pm
Re: 1999 Prelude and burnt Oil Peter O Honda 2 0 24 Jun 2003 08:31 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.