Honda Car Forum | |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
For owners...
How does real world gas mileage compare to the EPA estimates and to the 2WD models? If the dealers are telling it true, and the Element is just a new body on a CRV, then it should be about the same as the CRV... one would expect, anyway. Thanks, Axel G. |
|
|||
|
Waiving the right to remain silent, "Axel Grease"
<Axel@Grease.org> said: > If the dealers are telling it true, and the Element is just a > new body on a CRV, then it should be about the same as the > CRV... one would expect, anyway. Check the weight and gearing differences. Also, the Element is a box on wheels, and probably has more wind resistance than the CRV. -- Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail The United States is the greatest country in the world..! Twenty-five million illegal aliens can't be wrong. |
|
|||
|
And not that an attractive box at that!
Tom "Larry J." <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message news:Xns960C59C339EE5larrythefrog@68.6.19.6... > Waiving the right to remain silent, "Axel Grease" > <Axel@Grease.org> said: > >> If the dealers are telling it true, and the Element is just a >> new body on a CRV, then it should be about the same as the >> CRV... one would expect, anyway. > > Check the weight and gearing differences. Also, the Element is a box > on wheels, and probably has more wind resistance than the CRV. > > -- > Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail > > The United States is the greatest country in the world..! > Twenty-five million illegal aliens can't be wrong. |
|
|||
|
I have a 2003 Element AWD automatic ... also a 2000 CRV
2003 AWD Element ... mostly highway driving I get 22-23 mpg ... never less than 20 mpg It is bigger box than the CRV, but I don't notice any problems with wind! However, Element is only 4 passenger with a total weight of 675 lbs ... so great for two adults! Also noisier and things side with NO carpet option! - Steve "Axel Grease" <Axel@Grease.org> wrote in message news:1128d3t178mh29c@corp.supernews.com... > For owners... > How does real world gas mileage compare to the EPA estimates and to the 2WD > models? > > If the dealers are telling it true, and the Element is just a new body on a > CRV, then it should be about the same as the CRV... one would expect, > anyway. > > Thanks, > Axel G. > > |
|
|||
|
My thanks to you, Steve, and to Orome for your answers.
You both seem to be getting low 20s in mpg. That is probably not bad for a boxy design. I would take the rear seat out and gain some cargo capacity and weight carrying capacity there. I rarely need more than 2 seats but I often need much space for my "stuff". BTW... Orome... I like the Element's looks just because it is different and has usable space. It is also the most comfortable vehicle I have gotten into in years. I detest sitting down low (on the ground) in any vehicle. Axel "Steve" <tacomabike@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:gy6Vd.91341$Th1.26460@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... >I have a 2003 Element AWD automatic ... also a 2000 CRV > > 2003 AWD Element ... mostly highway driving I get 22-23 mpg ... never less > than 20 mpg > > It is bigger box than the CRV, but I don't notice any problems with wind! > > However, Element is only 4 passenger with a total weight of 675 lbs ... so > great for two adults! Also noisier and things side with NO carpet option! > > - Steve > > > > > > "Axel Grease" <Axel@Grease.org> wrote in message > news:1128d3t178mh29c@corp.supernews.com... >> For owners... >> How does real world gas mileage compare to the EPA estimates and to the > 2WD >> models? >> >> If the dealers are telling it true, and the Element is just a new body on > a >> CRV, then it should be about the same as the CRV... one would expect, >> anyway. >> >> Thanks, >> Axel G. >> >> > > |
|
|||
|
> BTW... Orome... I like the Element's looks just because it is different and
> has usable space. It is also the most comfortable vehicle I have gotten > into in years. I detest sitting down low (on the ground) in any vehicle. I agree on all points, having come to this from a sedan. Its flexibility is what sold me: it's a four-seater; it's a tent; it's a light cargo hauler; it's an away-office; it's a bike-trailer. ![]() |
|
|||
|
"Orome" <oromeNICHTSPAM23@cs.com> wrote in message
news:UbGdnXu_IqV-nLjfRVn-oA@snappydsl.net... >> And not that an attractive box at that! > > I respectfully disagree. As long as it is respectfully! Me personally, the only part of a vehicle that I have any interest in how it looks is the dashboard. I don't have to look at the rest of it. I remember when the new Accords came out, a whole bunch of people complained about how Honda made the rear-end "ugly". I figured, that's not my problem, let the car behind me worry about it. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low mileage 93 Del Sol SI: should timing belt change be based on time instead of mileage? | Honda 2 | 2 | 06 Mar 2004 09:40 am | |
| Element | bob | Honda 2 | 23 | 29 Feb 2004 12:28 pm |
| How is the Element? | Bernard Felix | Honda 2 | 13 | 28 Jan 2004 04:43 am |
| Element Disappointing mileage! | Rick Ross | Honda 2 | 2 | 11 Sep 2003 07:11 pm |