Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 02 Dec 2004, 04:33 pm
Elmo P. Shagnasty
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Octane Overkill

In article <41AF8415.C179DD89@junkmail.com>,
Randolph <trash@junkmail.com> wrote:

> Joe Lang wrote:
>
> > all gasoline has the same energy per volume. always. period.

>
> That is simply not true. Gasoline is a mixture of a large number of
> components, and the mixture varies from grade to grade, station to
> station, week to week and from place to place. One example is that the
> winter formula with extra oxygenates contain several percent less energy
> pr gallon than the summer variety.
>
> Adding ethanol to gasoline will increase the octane rating and decrease
> the energy content.


We'll never hear from "Joe Lang" again.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 02 Dec 2004, 05:24 pm
Joe Lang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Octane Overkill

ah, if it were only true.
i will gladly take you on with half my brain tied behind my back! it is you
who should perhaps open a book. for the record, this NG and the vw
watercooled NG have been down this road many times before, and there is
always someone who thinks they have it figured out. always. sometimes i
pick a fight. and sometimes i dont have time to educate. but you decide
that you know what you are talking about based on what? your ego?
i would be willing to venture a guess that you have never put in any of the
required study to make the statements that you seem so confident about, but
there you are. just have to take the bait.

so i will gladly educate you, if you ask the right question.

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-431A6C.16335302122004@text.usenetserver.com...
> In article <41AF8415.C179DD89@junkmail.com>,
> Randolph <trash@junkmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Joe Lang wrote:
> >
> > > all gasoline has the same energy per volume. always. period.

> >

Randolph wrote

> > That is simply not true. Gasoline is a mixture of a large number of
> > components, and the mixture varies from grade to grade, station to
> > station, week to week and from place to place. One example is that the
> > winter formula with extra oxygenates contain several percent less energy
> > pr gallon than the summer variety.


you are correct in just about everything you say. the gas you buy today
will certainly be different from the gas you buy next week. and it is true
that oxygenates such as MTBE TBA TAME etc will efectively lower the BTU per
gallon. (so my statement needs to read "all gasoline has the same energy
per volume. always. period, except in cases when comparing oxygenated to
normal RFG II". but that is not very elegant at all is it?)

*it is certainly true that all gasoline has the same energy content*. and
all oxygenated gasoline has the same energy content. (MTBE is roughly 7%
oxygen, and since oxygen does not contribute to BTU, gas with MTBE is
effectively "lower power". sometime we can discuss how MTBE has a
relatively HIGH octane value, but that is another topic... strange huh?
high octane, but lower energy... are you paying attention? will elmo
perhaps take the bait? think elmo, think before you hit that reply all
button.)

> > Adding ethanol to gasoline will increase the octane rating and decrease
> > the energy content.


you can add whatever feedstock you want, and at the end of the day the fuel
will be blended to meet RFG II guidance. that is exactly what refinery does
you know. they select from a huge number of variable chemicals based on
price and availability to meet the RFG II requirements, along with local
requirements. wouldnt it be a different situation if Exxon gas had more
energy than Shell gas? maybe if you just contemplate what it is you are
trying to believe you can see the absurdity of your statement.

please please please do not think that octane has anything to do with energy
content (or flame speed or quality or anything other than anti knock
ability.) that is not what octane measures. if it did, i would reccomend
that you exclusively purchase 100 octane aviation fuel. boy, think of the
performance!

> We'll never hear from "Joe Lang" again.


if i dont have anything to add, i usually keep quite kid. a word of advice,
it is better to keep silent and appear ignorant than to post to a NG and
remove all doubt!


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 02 Dec 2004, 05:29 pm
Joe Lang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Octane Overkill


> Do you dispute this sentence:
>
> "A gasoline with a higher octane rating will produce less BTUs when
> burned than a lower octane gasoline."


YES.

> If you do, then I *know* you're an idiot.


hey, you might think the world is flat too. but you look pretty damn stupid
to anyone who has any idea of what they are talking about. where did you
get this information?

> (For the record: I did not write that sentence. I copied it...)


maybe you might start not believeing everything you read. look, i dont want
to bust your hump, but come on man, im giving you an oppurtunity to learn
about a topic you obviously care about. now try and learn a little so next
time you can have fun when some moron posts bullshit.




Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 02 Dec 2004, 07:18 pm
Dave Kelsen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Octane Overkill

On 12/2/2004 4:24 PM Joe Lang spake these words of knowledge:

> ah, if it were only true.
> i will gladly take you on with half my brain tied behind my back! it is you
> who should perhaps open a book. for the record, this NG and the vw
> watercooled NG have been down this road many times before, and there is
> always someone who thinks they have it figured out. always. sometimes i
> pick a fight. and sometimes i dont have time to educate. but you decide
> that you know what you are talking about based on what? your ego?
> i would be willing to venture a guess that you have never put in any of the
> required study to make the statements that you seem so confident about, but
> there you are. just have to take the bait.
>
> so i will gladly educate you, if you ask the right question.
>


I'm curious; why do you bother to use periods, and even question marks?


RFT!!!
Dave Kelsen
--
.... If ignorance is bliss, you must be ecstatic.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Octane and mileage Joe McArthur Acura 16 27 Jul 2006 07:49 pm
Octane Booster VTEC Honda 2 9 19 Apr 2005 07:34 pm
Octane for Civic Randy Given Honda 3 13 28 Aug 2003 07:11 pm
Gas Octane rating HarvT Acura 2 20 Jul 2003 11:26 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.