Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07 Jun 2004, 06:07 pm
Oleg Ace
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 1999 Accord V6 - typical revs and gas mileage

Have a few questions about typical experiences people have with the V6
accord of 98-02 vintage.

The car I drove a lot previously was a '97 Maxima. What I notice on the
Accord is that it will shift out of first gear around 3500, sometimed 4000
rpm under moderate acceleration. The 2nd to 3rd shift point is also pretty
high rev. The Maxima would never hold first or second over 3000, unless you
floor it. I realize I'm comparing different cars here, but just want another
person word that this is normal on the accord to rev higher. I'm guessing
Maxima has more low-rev torque, but just need reassurance, you know.

Also, what kind of mileage are people getting on the V6 accord in city
driving? I'm getting around 18 mpg in mostly city driving with sporadic A/C
use. Spec is 20, so it's not too far off, but would be interested to hear
others' experiences.

Thanks.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07 Jun 2004, 08:15 pm
MLD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1999 Accord V6 - typical revs and gas mileage

2000 Accord V6. Get about 24-26 mpg around the city, 28-31 highway
depending on how long I'm over 75-80.. Don't hot rod from a standing start,
generally slow steady acceleration
MLD
"Oleg Ace" <aceoleg@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:Iy6xc.120$wW1.91@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.ro gers.com...
> Have a few questions about typical experiences people have with the V6
> accord of 98-02 vintage.
>
> The car I drove a lot previously was a '97 Maxima. What I notice on the
> Accord is that it will shift out of first gear around 3500, sometimed 4000
> rpm under moderate acceleration. The 2nd to 3rd shift point is also pretty
> high rev. The Maxima would never hold first or second over 3000, unless

you
> floor it. I realize I'm comparing different cars here, but just want

another
> person word that this is normal on the accord to rev higher. I'm guessing
> Maxima has more low-rev torque, but just need reassurance, you know.
>
> Also, what kind of mileage are people getting on the V6 accord in city
> driving? I'm getting around 18 mpg in mostly city driving with sporadic

A/C
> use. Spec is 20, so it's not too far off, but would be interested to hear
> others' experiences.
>
> Thanks.
>
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07 Jun 2004, 09:02 pm
Oleg Ace
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1999 Accord V6 - typical revs and gas mileage

Thanks for response. Which city you live in?

That the thing though, I don't hot rod off a start, I get those shift points
just by trying to keep up with accelerating traffic around me, mostly cars
with weaker engines (4-cyl ones). I'm a little mystified at having to push
the V6 so much to keep up with a civic or a rav4, for example. (again, i'm
not talking about racing, just keeping up with regular people doing a
regular start off a light)

"MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:Fq8xc.16555$QT3.2286@nwrdny01.gnilink.net...
> 2000 Accord V6. Get about 24-26 mpg around the city, 28-31 highway
> depending on how long I'm over 75-80.. Don't hot rod from a standing

start,
> generally slow steady acceleration
> MLD
> "Oleg Ace" <aceoleg@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:Iy6xc.120$wW1.91@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.ro gers.com...
> > Have a few questions about typical experiences people have with the V6
> > accord of 98-02 vintage.
> >
> > The car I drove a lot previously was a '97 Maxima. What I notice on the
> > Accord is that it will shift out of first gear around 3500, sometimed

4000
> > rpm under moderate acceleration. The 2nd to 3rd shift point is also

pretty
> > high rev. The Maxima would never hold first or second over 3000, unless

> you
> > floor it. I realize I'm comparing different cars here, but just want

> another
> > person word that this is normal on the accord to rev higher. I'm

guessing
> > Maxima has more low-rev torque, but just need reassurance, you know.
> >
> > Also, what kind of mileage are people getting on the V6 accord in city
> > driving? I'm getting around 18 mpg in mostly city driving with sporadic

> A/C
> > use. Spec is 20, so it's not too far off, but would be interested to

hear
> > others' experiences.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >

>
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07 Jun 2004, 11:08 pm
Keith J
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1999 Accord V6 - typical revs and gas mileage

'99 V6... Tallahassee, FL
I have ~88k miles and have the same range in mileages, although I do hot rod
more than you. If I'm strictly highway speeds (80mph) with cruise on, I get
~34mpg.

I have no problem blowing away a RAV4 or civic. Hey... what's a RAV4 good
for?... not much. just kidding, I actually like them, just a bit pricey in
comparison to the Hondas.

Keith




"MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:Fq8xc.16555$QT3.2286@nwrdny01.gnilink.net...
> 2000 Accord V6. Get about 24-26 mpg around the city, 28-31 highway
> depending on how long I'm over 75-80.. Don't hot rod from a standing

start,
> generally slow steady acceleration
> MLD
> "Oleg Ace" <aceoleg@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:Iy6xc.120$wW1.91@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.ro gers.com...
> > Have a few questions about typical experiences people have with the V6
> > accord of 98-02 vintage.
> >
> > The car I drove a lot previously was a '97 Maxima. What I notice on the
> > Accord is that it will shift out of first gear around 3500, sometimed

4000
> > rpm under moderate acceleration. The 2nd to 3rd shift point is also

pretty
> > high rev. The Maxima would never hold first or second over 3000, unless

> you
> > floor it. I realize I'm comparing different cars here, but just want

> another
> > person word that this is normal on the accord to rev higher. I'm

guessing
> > Maxima has more low-rev torque, but just need reassurance, you know.
> >
> > Also, what kind of mileage are people getting on the V6 accord in city
> > driving? I'm getting around 18 mpg in mostly city driving with sporadic

> A/C
> > use. Spec is 20, so it's not too far off, but would be interested to

hear
> > others' experiences.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >

>
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08 Jun 2004, 05:24 pm
MLD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1999 Accord V6 - typical revs and gas mileage

About 10 mi. North of Boston. The car just perks along with power to spare.
If you have to push it then I'm inclined to think that you've got a problem
somewhere.
MLD
"Oleg Ace" <aceoleg@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:P69xc.28$MH3.27@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rog ers.com...
> Thanks for response. Which city you live in?
>
> That the thing though, I don't hot rod off a start, I get those shift

points
> just by trying to keep up with accelerating traffic around me, mostly cars
> with weaker engines (4-cyl ones). I'm a little mystified at having to push
> the V6 so much to keep up with a civic or a rav4, for example. (again, i'm
> not talking about racing, just keeping up with regular people doing a
> regular start off a light)
>
> "MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:Fq8xc.16555$QT3.2286@nwrdny01.gnilink.net...
> > 2000 Accord V6. Get about 24-26 mpg around the city, 28-31 highway
> > depending on how long I'm over 75-80.. Don't hot rod from a standing

> start,
> > generally slow steady acceleration
> > MLD
> > "Oleg Ace" <aceoleg@rogers.com> wrote in message
> > news:Iy6xc.120$wW1.91@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.ro gers.com...
> > > Have a few questions about typical experiences people have with the V6
> > > accord of 98-02 vintage.
> > >
> > > The car I drove a lot previously was a '97 Maxima. What I notice on

the
> > > Accord is that it will shift out of first gear around 3500, sometimed

> 4000
> > > rpm under moderate acceleration. The 2nd to 3rd shift point is also

> pretty
> > > high rev. The Maxima would never hold first or second over 3000,

unless
> > you
> > > floor it. I realize I'm comparing different cars here, but just want

> > another
> > > person word that this is normal on the accord to rev higher. I'm

> guessing
> > > Maxima has more low-rev torque, but just need reassurance, you know.
> > >
> > > Also, what kind of mileage are people getting on the V6 accord in city
> > > driving? I'm getting around 18 mpg in mostly city driving with

sporadic
> > A/C
> > > use. Spec is 20, so it's not too far off, but would be interested to

> hear
> > > others' experiences.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09 Jun 2004, 09:52 am
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1999 Accord V6 - typical revs and gas mileage

your engine shifts at higher revs because that's what it's programmed to
do - just a honda engineer decision you have to live with. the only way
to change it is to try and re-map the engine management computer. iirc,
the honda engine red lines about 1000 rpm more than the nissan, so as a
percentage of available revs, the shift pattern is not that different.

regarding comparative acceleration, fewer cylinders are not "weaker".
in fact, they're considerably more efficient [no flame war!] because
there's fewer moving parts. also consider the power/weight ratio - both
the civic & rav4 are light vehicles.

Oleg Ace wrote:
> Thanks for response. Which city you live in?
>
> That the thing though, I don't hot rod off a start, I get those shift points
> just by trying to keep up with accelerating traffic around me, mostly cars
> with weaker engines (4-cyl ones). I'm a little mystified at having to push
> the V6 so much to keep up with a civic or a rav4, for example. (again, i'm
> not talking about racing, just keeping up with regular people doing a
> regular start off a light)
>
> "MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:Fq8xc.16555$QT3.2286@nwrdny01.gnilink.net...
>
>>2000 Accord V6. Get about 24-26 mpg around the city, 28-31 highway
>>depending on how long I'm over 75-80.. Don't hot rod from a standing

>
> start,
>
>>generally slow steady acceleration
>>MLD
>>"Oleg Ace" <aceoleg@rogers.com> wrote in message
>>news:Iy6xc.120$wW1.91@news04.bloor.is.net.cable. rogers.com...
>>
>>>Have a few questions about typical experiences people have with the V6
>>>accord of 98-02 vintage.
>>>
>>>The car I drove a lot previously was a '97 Maxima. What I notice on the
>>>Accord is that it will shift out of first gear around 3500, sometimed

>
> 4000
>
>>>rpm under moderate acceleration. The 2nd to 3rd shift point is also

>
> pretty
>
>>>high rev. The Maxima would never hold first or second over 3000, unless

>>
>>you
>>
>>>floor it. I realize I'm comparing different cars here, but just want

>>
>>another
>>
>>>person word that this is normal on the accord to rev higher. I'm

>
> guessing
>
>>>Maxima has more low-rev torque, but just need reassurance, you know.
>>>
>>>Also, what kind of mileage are people getting on the V6 accord in city
>>>driving? I'm getting around 18 mpg in mostly city driving with sporadic

>>
>>A/C
>>
>>>use. Spec is 20, so it's not too far off, but would be interested to

>
> hear
>
>>>others' experiences.
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>

>>
>>

>
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09 Jun 2004, 06:06 pm
Oleg Ace
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1999 Accord V6 - typical revs and gas mileage

Yep, that's what it is.
Just to put my suspicions to rest, I got to drive a different '99 V6 today,
and pretty much confirmed what you're saying and what I thought - it's just
a different shift pattern.
I guess what threw me off is that the Accord transmission also shifts
crisper than Nissan's, accentuating the different shift pattern. Not that I
mind or anything - it's kinda cool to see the tach actually using more than
1/3rd of it's rangem, as long as it's normal behavior.

Re 4cyl cars - you may have a point. I drove a Matrix, and seemed quite
perky despite the smallish engine. I guess the Accord is pretty heavy after
all.

Thanks for your response.

"jim beam" <uce@ftc.gov> wrote in message
news:8vFxc.7599$7x5.226@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com ...
> your engine shifts at higher revs because that's what it's programmed to
> do - just a honda engineer decision you have to live with. the only way
> to change it is to try and re-map the engine management computer. iirc,
> the honda engine red lines about 1000 rpm more than the nissan, so as a
> percentage of available revs, the shift pattern is not that different.
>
> regarding comparative acceleration, fewer cylinders are not "weaker".
> in fact, they're considerably more efficient [no flame war!] because
> there's fewer moving parts. also consider the power/weight ratio - both
> the civic & rav4 are light vehicles.
>
> Oleg Ace wrote:
> > Thanks for response. Which city you live in?
> >
> > That the thing though, I don't hot rod off a start, I get those shift

points
> > just by trying to keep up with accelerating traffic around me, mostly

cars
> > with weaker engines (4-cyl ones). I'm a little mystified at having to

push
> > the V6 so much to keep up with a civic or a rav4, for example. (again,

i'm
> > not talking about racing, just keeping up with regular people doing a
> > regular start off a light)
> >
> > "MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message
> > news:Fq8xc.16555$QT3.2286@nwrdny01.gnilink.net...
> >
> >>2000 Accord V6. Get about 24-26 mpg around the city, 28-31 highway
> >>depending on how long I'm over 75-80.. Don't hot rod from a standing

> >
> > start,
> >
> >>generally slow steady acceleration
> >>MLD
> >>"Oleg Ace" <aceoleg@rogers.com> wrote in message
> >>news:Iy6xc.120$wW1.91@news04.bloor.is.net.cable. rogers.com...
> >>
> >>>Have a few questions about typical experiences people have with the V6
> >>>accord of 98-02 vintage.
> >>>
> >>>The car I drove a lot previously was a '97 Maxima. What I notice on the
> >>>Accord is that it will shift out of first gear around 3500, sometimed

> >
> > 4000
> >
> >>>rpm under moderate acceleration. The 2nd to 3rd shift point is also

> >
> > pretty
> >
> >>>high rev. The Maxima would never hold first or second over 3000, unless
> >>
> >>you
> >>
> >>>floor it. I realize I'm comparing different cars here, but just want
> >>
> >>another
> >>
> >>>person word that this is normal on the accord to rev higher. I'm

> >
> > guessing
> >
> >>>Maxima has more low-rev torque, but just need reassurance, you know.
> >>>
> >>>Also, what kind of mileage are people getting on the V6 accord in city
> >>>driving? I'm getting around 18 mpg in mostly city driving with sporadic
> >>
> >>A/C
> >>
> >>>use. Spec is 20, so it's not too far off, but would be interested to

> >
> > hear
> >
> >>>others' experiences.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>

> >
> >

>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
revs go up and down when in park pixielee Honda 3 4 27 Jan 2007 08:25 pm
1989 Accord revs and shuts off Eightupman Honda 2 12 26 Oct 2006 08:20 pm
choking in low revs louis_c Honda 3 2 08 Apr 2006 01:03 am
93 accord revs but doesn't move CUDS2009@gmail.com Honda 3 1 09 Dec 2005 11:22 am
what are typical honda problems, your experiences noel akins Honda 3 1 23 Feb 2004 02:12 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.