Honda Car Forum | |
|
|||
|
I don't know if I missed something long ago, but I discovered while in
stop and go interstate traffic that my Accord *might* be adjusting engine RPM on it's own during upshifts. For example, while I'm disengaging the clutch and shifting to the next highest gear, the engine RPM drops some but not all the way to idle. Usually between 1500 and 2000 or so. And I found that if I allow the engine RPM to settle (less than a second), and just let the clutch out WITHOUT gas, it drops right in perfectly. I haven't had a chance to test it out any more since yesterday since I drove my old car today, but does this seem right? Seems like something they should be doing if they're not. I've had the car less than 4 months, it's a 6 speed V6. |
|
|||
|
On 30 Apr 2004 06:29:24 -0700, acctforjunk@yahoo.com (Im anonymous) wrote:
>I don't know if I missed something long ago, but I discovered while in >stop and go interstate traffic that my Accord *might* be adjusting >engine RPM on it's own during upshifts. >For example, while I'm disengaging the clutch and shifting to the next >highest gear, the engine RPM drops some but not all the way to idle. >Usually between 1500 and 2000 or so. And I found that if I allow the >engine RPM to settle (less than a second), and just let the clutch out >WITHOUT gas, it drops right in perfectly. >I haven't had a chance to test it out any more since yesterday since I >drove my old car today, but does this seem right? Seems like >something they should be doing if they're not. I've had the car less >than 4 months, it's a 6 speed V6. Hard to envisage exactly the conditions you're describing but if most noticeable in traffic/low rpms situations, certainly most modern engine management systems will not abruptly throttle the engine, when you let off the accelerator, for emissions reasons. It's also possible that Honda did not engineer the flywheel weight of the V6 MT properly for a manual transmission.<shrug> What I've noticed in my '99 Integra is that, in say traffic, when I coast in neutral occasionally (bad driving practice but in traffic saves wear on the clutch/gears) , the engine will not drop below 1000rpm as long as the car is moving. With our 2K Accord 4L Coupe, if the engine is cold, when you declutch to change gear, the engine actually sounds like it's racing - its not much, say 1500rpm, but is noticeable compared with its behavior when hot. I haven't been able to confirm this but I've also been told that some recent engines are set to a high "idle speed" on gear changes during the 1st 5K or so miles. I haven't been able to find any docs to back this up though so it could be just a dealer story to placate a persnickety customer. Certainly the next phase of "emissions controls" is going after various aspects of engine running regime -- moderate & hard acceleration, warm-up, engine braking -- which could make the drivability ugly. Apparently some auto-makers are back to that awful (70s era) air-pump device to cope with this - dunno about Honda. I guess bureaucrats need jobs too.:-) Rgds, George Macdonald "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me?? |
|
|||
|
George Macdonald <fammacd=!SPAM^nothanks@tellurian.com> spake unto the
masses in news:9nt690hkk91219pe7tr0jc3ohbkstd6494@4ax.com: > Certainly the next phase of "emissions > controls" is going after various aspects of engine running regime -- > moderate & hard acceleration, warm-up, engine braking -- which could > make the drivability ugly. Apparently some auto-makers are back to > that awful (70s era) air-pump device to cope with this - dunno about > Honda. I guess bureaucrats need jobs too.:-) Yeah. They're not happy with a 99% reduction in emissions. They want 99.9%, cost and reasonability be damned! -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda FAQ http://www3.telus.net/public/johnings/faq.html How to find anything on the Internet or in Usenet Groups: www.google.com www.groups.google.com |
|
|||
|
George Macdonald <fammacd=!SPAM^nothanks@tellurian.com> wrote in message news:<9nt690hkk91219pe7tr0jc3ohbkstd6494@4ax.com>. ..
> On 30 Apr 2004 06:29:24 -0700, acctforjunk@yahoo.com (Im anonymous) wrote: Sorry for overexplaining it. What I was getting at is it seems like when I shifted, the engine sets its RPM to what the transmission side of the clutch would be spinning at, ie. the clutch engages perfectly with virtually no slip. Of course this means I keep my foot off the gas until the clutch is engaged. I haven't driven it since, but I'll check it out more when I do. I think it's cool if this is what the car is really doing. I seem to have a problem with this particular car on judging how much gas to give it when shifting. > > ><snip> > Hard to envisage exactly the conditions you're describing but if most > noticeable in traffic/low rpms situations, certainly most modern engine > management systems will not abruptly throttle the engine, when you let off > the accelerator, for emissions reasons. It's also possible that Honda did > not engineer the flywheel weight of the V6 MT properly for a manual > transmission.<shrug> > > What I've noticed in my '99 Integra is that, in say traffic, when I coast > in neutral occasionally (bad driving practice but in traffic saves wear on > the clutch/gears) , the engine will not drop below 1000rpm as long as the > car is moving. With our 2K Accord 4L Coupe, if the engine is cold, when > you declutch to change gear, the engine actually sounds like it's racing - > its not much, say 1500rpm, but is noticeable compared with its behavior > when hot. > > I haven't been able to confirm this but I've also been told that some > recent engines are set to a high "idle speed" on gear changes during the > 1st 5K or so miles. I haven't been able to find any docs to back this up > though so it could be just a dealer story to placate a persnickety > customer. Certainly the next phase of "emissions controls" is going after > various aspects of engine running regime -- moderate & hard acceleration, > warm-up, engine braking -- which could make the drivability ugly. > Apparently some auto-makers are back to that awful (70s era) air-pump > device to cope with this - dunno about Honda. I guess bureaucrats need > jobs too.:-) > > Rgds, George Macdonald > > "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me?? |
|
|||
|
Not sure what your getting at, but a friend of mine has a standard 1.8T
Passat which is drive by wire.The Passat, will acutally modulate the engine's rpm when the clutch is being engaged to assisst with shifting. Considering the weight of car and the little 1.8T engine, the help with intial clutch take-up is a bonus. Regarding your V6 standard Accord. Having to wait allmost a second in order for the engine to wind down seems a little excessive in stop and go driving. I suppose the V6's excessive torque can make for an abrupt up shit, unless the engine is completely idling (I defently don't have that problem with my teenie 106hp DX engine). In normal situtation, up shift's on a standard tranny can be made smooth if you're willing to ride the clutch a bit during take-up. Also, it's good driving practice to be completely off the accelerator before going down on the clutch. If you speed up the shifting process, going down on the clutch and letting off the gas can seem juxtapositoned, but when you slow things down, your right foot should be completely off the gas before going down on the clutch with your left foot (unless you're blipping...) Pars Im anonymous wrote: > I don't know if I missed something long ago, but I discovered while in > stop and go interstate traffic that my Accord *might* be adjusting > engine RPM on it's own during upshifts. > For example, while I'm disengaging the clutch and shifting to the next > highest gear, the engine RPM drops some but not all the way to idle. > Usually between 1500 and 2000 or so. And I found that if I allow the > engine RPM to settle (less than a second), and just let the clutch out > WITHOUT gas, it drops right in perfectly. > I haven't had a chance to test it out any more since yesterday since I > drove my old car today, but does this seem right? Seems like > something they should be doing if they're not. I've had the car less > than 4 months, it's a 6 speed V6. |
|
|||
|
Yes, that's it, it's modulating the engine RPM when I shift. I
checked it out more this last weekend, and that's definatly what it's doing. If I don't give it gas until the clutch is engaged or almost all the way engaged, usually I can hardly tell the clutch was engaged, ie, it doesn't immediately pull the engine RPM down or speed it up to match the road speed/gear ratio. Pars <"sdaro(remove)"@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<4093B479.E0A85105@hotmail.com>... > Not sure what your getting at, but a friend of mine has a standard 1.8T > Passat which is drive by wire.The Passat, will acutally modulate the > engine's rpm when the clutch is being engaged to assisst with shifting. > Considering the weight of car and the little 1.8T engine, the help with > intial clutch take-up is a bonus. > > Regarding your V6 standard Accord. Having to wait allmost a second in > order for the engine to wind down seems a little excessive in stop and go > driving. I suppose the V6's excessive torque can make for an abrupt up > shit, unless the engine is completely idling (I defently don't have that > problem with my teenie 106hp DX engine). > > In normal situtation, up shift's on a standard tranny can be made smooth > if you're willing to ride the clutch a bit during take-up. Also, it's good > driving practice to be completely off the accelerator before going down on > the clutch. If you speed up the shifting process, going down on the clutch > and letting off the gas can seem juxtapositoned, but when you slow things > down, your right foot should be completely off the gas before going down > on the clutch with your left foot (unless you're blipping...) > > Pars > |
|
|||
|
I don't understand the mystery? This holding the engine
near to what should be the necessary RPM was standard even in carburetor cars. With electronics, the concept is controlled better. But the concept is older than Honda made cars. Im anonymous wrote: > Yes, that's it, it's modulating the engine RPM when I shift. I > checked it out more this last weekend, and that's definatly what > it's doing. If I don't give it gas until the clutch is engaged or > almost all the way engaged, usually I can hardly tell the clutch > was engaged, ie, it doesn't immediately pull the engine RPM down > or speed it up to match the road speed/gear ratio. |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 03 May 2004 12:08:34 -0400, w_tom <w_tom1@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I don't understand the mystery? This holding the engine >near to what should be the necessary RPM was standard even in >carburetor cars. With electronics, the concept is controlled >better. But the concept is older than Honda made cars. Name one carbureted car that did this. Mine sure didn't (Fiat 124, Honda Accord 87), and I never heard of it, unless something like the ancient Porsche Tiptronic did that circa 1970. I think my old Accord was at least advanced enough to keep the RPM up around 1200 if, well, I'm not sure what it knew about road speed or gearing, but I think the number was constant, and might often enough approximate where the next upshift should be. Say, OP, what about downshifts, does it approximate the RPM on those? ![]() J. |
|
|||
|
Ford Capri (using Holley 5210C carburetors). 1980 Honda
Accord. Forgot which one it was, but the shop manual for one carburetor even gave a dimension for setting the dashpot. JXStern wrote: > Name one carbureted car that did this. > > Mine sure didn't (Fiat 124, Honda Accord 87), and I never heard of > it, unless something like the ancient Porsche Tiptronic did that > circa 1970. I think my old Accord was at least advanced enough > to keep the RPM up around 1200 if, well, I'm not sure what it knew > about road speed or gearing, but I think the number was constant, > and might often enough approximate where the next upshift should > be. > > Say, OP, what about downshifts, does it approximate the RPM on those? |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 04 May 2004 18:18:21 -0400, w_tom <w_tom1@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Ford Capri (using Holley 5210C carburetors). 1980 Honda >Accord. Forgot which one it was, but the shop manual for one >carburetor even gave a dimension for setting the dashpot. I thought the dashpots were just a damping device, related to manifold vacuum, to prevent abrupt throttle shut-off and the resulting emissions burp. I've never heard of it being linked to road speed and gearing. >JXStern wrote: >> Name one carbureted car that did this. >> >> Mine sure didn't (Fiat 124, Honda Accord 87), and I never heard of >> it, unless something like the ancient Porsche Tiptronic did that >> circa 1970. I think my old Accord was at least advanced enough >> to keep the RPM up around 1200 if, well, I'm not sure what it knew >> about road speed or gearing, but I think the number was constant, >> and might often enough approximate where the next upshift should >> be. >> >> Say, OP, what about downshifts, does it approximate the RPM on those? Rgds, George Macdonald "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me?? |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Proper viscosity oil in 1994 Civic DX | mhoza | Honda 3 | 3 | 09 Jun 2006 09:57 pm |
| Proper way to remove MES connector? | Anonymous | Honda 2 | 0 | 21 Jul 2005 10:00 pm |
| Proper way to remove MES connector? | Barry Kwasny | Honda 2 | 0 | 28 Jun 2005 11:39 am |
| Proper shifting | Im anonymous | Honda 3 | 12 | 05 May 2004 08:05 pm |
| Proper wire | DaveT | Honda 2 | 4 | 08 Oct 2003 11:18 pm |