Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
On Sat, 9 May 2009 08:51:43 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com>
wrote: >On May 8, 8:29*am, Black Dragon <b...@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >> I know people who've had nothing but troubles with Toyota's and will >> never buy another. > >The problem with Honda, Toyota, Acura, etc. is that the cylinder head >has so little material in it that if you experience even a momentary >overheating problem such as would be caused with say a fan switch >failure you're looking at a very expensive cylinder head rebuild. >Other manufactures have more material in the head and their heads can >often handle a brief over heating situation... not so with Honda, >Toyota or Acura. This FACT makes automotive repair shops tons of >money. > >Do Honda, Toyota and Acura have advantages... certainly they do. They >have a much better fit and finish and I believe they hold their >suppliers to tighter tolerances. > >I've had two Honda's. Both had cylinder head problems. I'd never buy >another Honda again. > >A classic Saab 900 Turbo is a much better designed and engineered car. >The classic Saab 900 uses double wishbone for it's front suspension. >The only major weakness of the Saab 900 Turbo is a gearbox that can't >handle over 300 hp without being babied. The engine can easily be made >to output 450 hp. It's a far better car in every possible way compared >to a Honda... better ride, better handling, more room, better engine, >etc. > >Jon Banquer >San Diego, CA > > |
|
|||
|
Since I am in my seventies, and have quite a few cars, I have had a
number of foreign, and a number of domestic. My first drivable car was a domestic, a Crosley, the second was an MG-TD. Averaging among all the cars I have owned, it is hard to make generalities. I have had domestic dogs and domestic gems, foreign dogs and foreign gems. I have even had both from same brand- often certain brands have bad years and good years. ALL cars in recent decades have been far better than my earlier cars. When people say, "they don't build them like they used to," I say "thank god." We have typically kept our cars for ten years, but in earlier days we had to get rid of some earlier, but my last car was 11 years old (a Dodge) when we sold it recently, with 150K miles. It was still in excellent shape, but wife was getting worried about its age. Even though the car got 32 in city, 36-37 on highway (used to get even better) we also wanted something with higher city milage, since most of our driving is city. We went with a Prius. Again, I have had mixed luck with both foreign and domestic. If you end up buying enough cars to even out the statistics, I don't think it makes much difference. In general, too, the gems FAR outweigh the dogs, even counting the cars from the forties and fifties, or the new cars of the seventies that we bought. Keep abreast of car reviews in the mags, word of mouth, etc. and you can avoid most dogs. |
|
|||
|
On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:01:03 -0400, Cliff wrote:
>>On May 8, 8:29ツ*am, Black Dragon <b...@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> I know people who've had nothing but troubles with Toyota's and will >>> never buy another. You have to do SOME maintenance! Were these the people like the ones that came into the service department when I was there, NEVER changed their oil (one documented case of 15,000 miles without an oil change!) and then wonder why the car blew up? "I had this kind of trouble with my Chevy, and bought a Toyota so I wouldn't HAVE this kind of trouble any more!" Yup...they're out there... |
|
|||
|
On May 10, 6:26 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote:
> On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:01:03 -0400, Cliff wrote: > >>On May 8, 8:29 am, Black Dragon <b...@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >>> I know people who've had nothing but troubles with Toyota's and will > >>> never buy another. > > You have to do SOME maintenance! Were these the people like the ones that > came into the service department when I was there, NEVER changed their oil > (one documented case of 15,000 miles without an oil change!) and then > wonder why the car blew up? "I had this kind of trouble with my Chevy, and > bought a Toyota so I wouldn't HAVE this kind of trouble any more!" > > Yup...they're out there... I have a friend that Never, ever, changed his oil on his new camry. He was lucky because this was the model years they were sludging. Get this, 37000 MILES on original oil and then it just died, and Toyota just gave him a new motor no questions asked, free and clear, talk about dumb ass luck for someone who didnt deserve it. But he kept it washed and clean. |
|
|||
|
Hachiroku 繝上メ繝*繧ッ <Trueno@e86.GTS> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying: > You have to do SOME maintenance! Were these the people like the ones > that came into the service department when I was there, NEVER changed > their oil (one documented case of 15,000 miles without an oil change!) > and then wonder why the car blew up? Gosh! FIFTEEN THOUSAND miles? FFS, that's less than the recommended service interval on most new cars over here... You 'merkins and your outdated obsession with changing the oil every ten minutes. |
|
|||
|
Thus spake Adrian <toomany2cvs@gmail.com> :
>Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> gurgled happily, sounding much like they >were saying: > >> You have to do SOME maintenance! Were these the people like the ones >> that came into the service department when I was there, NEVER changed >> their oil (one documented case of 15,000 miles without an oil change!) >> and then wonder why the car blew up? > >Gosh! FIFTEEN THOUSAND miles? > >FFS, that's less than the recommended service interval on most new cars >over here... You 'merkins and your outdated obsession with changing the >oil every ten minutes. Huh? I just looked at the German BMW manual. Oil change at 15000 km. Now things like "tune up" and "valve adjustment" come at something like 165,000 km. Of course, the service minder should be your real key for modern cars. Even my Fit has one. I even think the Matrix has one. -- - dillon I am not invalid The RMS Titanic sank on April 15th. US income taxes are due on April 15th. Coincidence? I think not. |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 11 May 2009 06:22:16 +0000, Adrian wrote:
> Hachiroku 繝上メ繝*繧ッ <Trueno@e86.GTS> gurgled happily, sounding much like they > were saying: > >> You have to do SOME maintenance! Were these the people like the ones >> that came into the service department when I was there, NEVER changed >> their oil (one documented case of 15,000 miles without an oil change!) >> and then wonder why the car blew up? > > Gosh! FIFTEEN THOUSAND miles? > > FFS, that's less than the recommended service interval on most new cars > over here... You 'merkins and your outdated obsession with changing the > oil every ten minutes. WHAT?!?!?! I don't let Dino oil go more than 5K! I change my synthetic at 4.5K. Works for me. Last three cars all had well over 250,000 on them. The problems with the Toyotas was someone designed the oil passages too narrow, and sludging occurred. The MFG's recommendation was 7,500 miles. Most of the sludging occurred beyond that point. There were a few cases of sludging at or below the recommendation of 7,500, and anyone that says they experienced sludging <5,000 between changes was either doing something horribly wrong, went to Jiffy-Lube, or is blowing smoke rings up your nether regions... BTW, Toyota's recommendation was lowered to 5K after that. I guess they hope those few people would change their oil <12,000... |
|
|||
|
On 2009-05-11 01:22:16 -0500, Adrian <toomany2cvs@gmail.com> said:
> Hachiroku 繝上メ繝*繧ッ <Trueno@e86.GTS> gurgled happily, sounding much like they > were saying: > >> You have to do SOME maintenance! Were these the people like the ones >> that came into the service department when I was there, NEVER changed >> their oil (one documented case of 15,000 miles without an oil change!) >> and then wonder why the car blew up? > > Gosh! FIFTEEN THOUSAND miles? > > FFS, that's less than the recommended service interval on most new cars > over here... You 'merkins and your outdated obsession with changing the > oil every ten minutes. Where's "over here"? US miles are different than kilometers, ya know... I can't think of anyplace that lets cars go 15K miles between oil changes, unless it's one of those arab countries where cars are much more expendable than they are here. -- ----------------------------- I only talk like that in the movies |
|
|||
|
yoda <yoda@Dagobah.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying: > On 2009-05-11 01:22:16 -0500, Adrian <toomany2cvs@gmail.com> said: > >> Hachiroku 繝上メ繝*繧ッ <Trueno@e86.GTS> gurgled happily, sounding much like >> they were saying: >> >>> You have to do SOME maintenance! Were these the people like the ones >>> that came into the service department when I was there, NEVER changed >>> their oil (one documented case of 15,000 miles without an oil change!) >>> and then wonder why the car blew up? >> >> Gosh! FIFTEEN THOUSAND miles? >> >> FFS, that's less than the recommended service interval on most new cars >> over here... You 'merkins and your outdated obsession with changing the >> oil every ten minutes. > Where's "over here"? US miles are different than kilometers, ya know... Just as well I'm not in a KM country, then. I wonder... If I was, d'you think I'd have mentioned that? Yes, I think I might have... > I can't think of anyplace that lets cars go 15K miles between oil > changes, unless it's one of those arab countries where cars are much > more expendable than they are here. <shrug> Your lack of imagination is not my problem. Here in the UQ, 18k miles/two years is not unusual as a service interval for recent cars, including for both current Saabs. Very few cars here "die" because of worn out engines. |
|
|||
|
"Adrian" <toomany2cvs@gmail.com> wrote in message news:76sk35F1ed7kpU1@mid.individual.net... <shrug> Your lack of imagination is not my problem. > > Here in the UQ, 18k miles/two years is not unusual as a service interval > for recent cars, including for both current Saabs. Very few cars here > "die" because of worn out engines. Surely these long intervals are due to the numberof companies buying FLEETS of cars and they only look at the pence (or whatever) per mile and are not too worried about a long life. Vauxhall/Opels have 2 yr service/oil change as you say but loads die around 60k/3 years due to thye oil issue - sometimes ts the turbo Another example - audi - computer can be set to 10K services or "long life" services - any mechanic worth his aslt would tell you don't touch the long life serviced cars IF you are the sort that "owns" their car or keeps them for years |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| japanese or american cars are better? | sebioalvarez | Honda Technical | 19 | 16 Aug 2007 11:56 am |
| Is it true that Japanese brand cars are far more better than American brand cars, in terms of... | tomcat_hornet11201 | Honda Technical | 21 | 16 Aug 2007 11:35 am |
| Quick poll, Would your next car be a honda? | stylesandsmiles | Honda 3 | 26 | 17 Nov 2004 05:17 pm |
| Re: Why aren't foreign cars as good as American cars? | Nathan Nagel | Honda 2 | 128 | 08 Aug 2003 09:18 am |
| Why I spurn American Cars | Snubis | Honda 2 | 102 | 26 Jul 2003 09:17 pm |