Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Joe wrote:
> On 2009-04-24, Clete <lecllaij@halifax.ca> wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:54:15 -0500, Joe >> <joe@spam.hits-spam-buffalo.com> wrote: >> >>> Just wanted to double-check this. I have never tightened the lug nuts >>> on tires using any method other than "as tight as you can get them", >>> using either a wrench or an impact gun. Since I am worried about the >>> potential of warping the rotors, I bought a torque wrench and today I >>> replaced the wheels on my 06 Civic Si. >>> >>> The specs I found said 80 ft/lbs. This is what I did. It really >>> doesn't seem all that tight, though. Is this the right torque, or was >>> I mislead? Last thing I want is a wheel coming off at speed, and I DO >>> like to drive hard... ;-) >> >> Lug nuts have no bearing at all on rotors. Torque for lug nuts is for >> 1. Safety >> 2. Alloy rims and safety > > I am pretty sure you are wrong on this. indeed. > I have read many reports, as > well as talked to several mechanics, who have stated that over-torque > on lug nuts on single thickness (non-ventilated) rotors will cause > warping. not permanent warping, but elastic distortion that makes the brakes shudder. if you take the disk off, you can see how skinny the honda hub is. it's strong enough for the job, but has no excess weight, therefore no excess stiffness. easy to elastically distort under uneven lug nut loading. > > I am no expert, by far, but I have already seen a difference. The > front wheels were making noise when torqued up, and the noise has > disappeared at 80 ft/lbs. > that's usual. with alloys though, you need to re-torque them after a few miles from re-fitting. they tend to move about on the hub a little and the lug nuts loosen. after that, they're fine. |
|
|||
|
Tegger wrote:
> "tww1491" <twaugh5@cox.net> wrote in > news:OurIl.49248$Ji5.41370@newsfe21.iad: > >> "Tegger" <invalid@invalid.inv> wrote in message >> news:Xns9BF7AFE4EB32Dtegger@208.90.168.18... > > >>> >>> My dad was a mechanical engineer. I still have his old beam-type >>> torque wrench. >>> >>> >> Still have mine.. was using it back in the 60s when I bought it at >> Sears. >> >> > > > Dad's old beam-type is the "DURO" brand, No. 8099� (no I'm not kidding; > there really is a one-half symbol in there), made by Duro Metal Products of > Chicago. The unit calls itself a "Tension Indicator". Reads up to 100 ft > lbs. > > Here it is: > <http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/torque_wrench_comparing_2.jpg> > > how did they compare? |
|
|||
|
Clete wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:54:15 -0500, Joe > <joe@spam.hits-spam-buffalo.com> wrote: > >> Just wanted to double-check this. I have never tightened the lug nuts >> on tires using any method other than "as tight as you can get them", >> using either a wrench or an impact gun. Since I am worried about the >> potential of warping the rotors, I bought a torque wrench and today I >> replaced the wheels on my 06 Civic Si. >> >> The specs I found said 80 ft/lbs. This is what I did. It really >> doesn't seem all that tight, though. Is this the right torque, or was >> I mislead? Last thing I want is a wheel coming off at speed, and I DO >> like to drive hard... ;-) > > > Lug nuts have no bearing at all on rotors. Torque for lug nuts is for > 1. Safety > 2. Alloy rims and safety Hi, No bearing on rotor? If you tighten it too mcuh you can warp the rotor (specially the non cast iron rotor; punched one) |
|
|||
|
jim beam <retard-finger@bad.example.net> wrote in
news:YfydnaHfG6eY_W_UnZ2dnUVZ_jZi4p2d@speakeasy.ne t: > Tegger wrote: >> "tww1491" <twaugh5@cox.net> wrote in >> news:OurIl.49248$Ji5.41370@newsfe21.iad: >> >>> "Tegger" <invalid@invalid.inv> wrote in message >>> news:Xns9BF7AFE4EB32Dtegger@208.90.168.18... >> >> >>>> >>>> My dad was a mechanical engineer. I still have his old beam-type >>>> torque wrench. >>>> >>>> >>> Still have mine.. was using it back in the 60s when I bought it at >>> Sears. >>> >>> >> >> >> Dad's old beam-type is the "DURO" brand, No. 8099� (no I'm not >> kidding; there really is a one-half symbol in there), made by Duro >> Metal Products of Chicago. The unit calls itself a "Tension >> Indicator". Reads up to 100 ft lbs. >> >> Here it is: >> <http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/torque_wrench_comparing_2.jpg> >> >> > > how did they compare? > It was weird. The Duro read a max of about 10% off either way from the clicker setting when the clicker clicked. The clicker's advertised tolerance is 4% up or down. I figured something had to be wrong with my setup, but I can't figure out what that might have been. The barrel of the clicker was NOT distorted at all by the vise. I checked with a mike. -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1999 Civic SiR, Rear and Front Hub Nut torque? | Synergy | Honda Technical | 0 | 25 May 2008 01:05 pm |
| I need to add some more horsepower/torque to a 1997 Civic? | Shawn G | Honda Technical | 10 | 24 Aug 2007 05:54 pm |
| Torque on civic lower rear arm bolts? | z | Honda 2 | 4 | 10 Jan 2007 03:37 pm |
| Torque on civic lower rear arm bolts? | z | Honda 3 | 4 | 10 Jan 2007 03:37 pm |
| 95 civic rocker arm torque specification | John | Honda 1 | 0 | 10 Feb 2004 04:35 pm |