Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 13 Dec 2003, 06:04 pm
nospam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pilot vs. competitors?

Hi all,

I'm looking for owner reviews of the Honda Pilot, as I'm considering
buying one of the new 2004's. I'm comparing to Highlanders, Tauregs,
and 4Runners...

Any help/suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 14 Dec 2003, 12:38 am
Richard W. Palmer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pilot vs. competitors?

Honda's fuel economy specs are right on for the Pilot, assuming that you
operate it as an SUV...not too much over speed limits. It handles rough
dirt/gravel/rocky desert and mountainous roads well, on one occasion: high
desert road to north rim Grand Canyon (Toroweap), survived entering an
extremely deep and hardened rut at some 60 MPH (shouldn't have done that),
tossing front end skyward and violently to the right, horrendous
crunch/thumps and all, from which it recovered with what I assumed had to be
a severely damaged wheel and front end. Alignment shop later determined
that no damage was suffered although they had to pry out some rocks wedged
into control arms...no alignment needed. This is not to say that the other
models you mentioned couldn't have fared as well.
Maneuverability is superb, turning radius surprisingly tight. The only
gripe I have to report after some 10K miles is driver's window which
intermittently fails to up/down auto. I continue to enjoy all that I've
paid for, all that Honda claims, and remain completely satisfied.

Richard


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 14 Dec 2003, 09:31 am
nospam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pilot vs. competitors?

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 05:38:43 GMT, "Richard W. Palmer"
<rwpalmer@mchsi.com> wrote:

> Honda's fuel economy specs are right on for the Pilot, assuming that you
>operate it as an SUV...not too much over speed limits. It handles rough
>dirt/gravel/rocky desert and mountainous roads well, on one occasion: high
>desert road to north rim Grand Canyon (Toroweap), survived entering an
>extremely deep and hardened rut at some 60 MPH (shouldn't have done that),
>tossing front end skyward and violently to the right, horrendous
>crunch/thumps and all, from which it recovered with what I assumed had to be
>a severely damaged wheel and front end. Alignment shop later determined
>that no damage was suffered although they had to pry out some rocks wedged
>into control arms...no alignment needed. This is not to say that the other
>models you mentioned couldn't have fared as well.
> Maneuverability is superb, turning radius surprisingly tight. The only
>gripe I have to report after some 10K miles is driver's window which
>intermittently fails to up/down auto. I continue to enjoy all that I've
>paid for, all that Honda claims, and remain completely satisfied.
>
> Richard
>



Sounds like my feelings on the Honda are right on, then...

Thanks!

-Jeff
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 14 Dec 2003, 10:42 am
tflfb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pilot vs. competitors?

not a very fair comparison.......4 Runner that's built on a truck
platform......Tauregs,........... cost allot more $$$....Highlander would be
close.

Tom

"nospam prodigy.net" <ebco@> wrote in message
news:tp6ntvg56ijauhqv1um179g3uvc548ck57@4ax.com...
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for owner reviews of the Honda Pilot, as I'm considering
> buying one of the new 2004's. I'm comparing to Highlanders, Tauregs,
> and 4Runners...
>
> Any help/suggestions?



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 14 Dec 2003, 11:52 am
JAC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pilot vs. competitors?

I would say in general, that you will find positive reviews on each of
those vehicles. With those four in particular, I think you just need
to spend a lot of time looking at and driving each one and determine
which one you like the best.

You are looking at very different products though however. The
Highlander and to some extent the Pilot, which are very much "cars"
versus the 4Runner, which is definitely a truck.

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 23:04:58 GMT, ebco@(nospam)prodigy.net wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I'm looking for owner reviews of the Honda Pilot, as I'm considering
>buying one of the new 2004's. I'm comparing to Highlanders, Tauregs,
>and 4Runners...
>
>Any help/suggestions?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 14 Dec 2003, 06:03 pm
Richard C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pilot vs. competitors?

My wife has a 2003 Pilot that she's had a little over a year with no
problems. One recall for a recalibrated SRS control unit. It just turned
15,000, I follow the 'traditional' Honda maintenance format in all our
Hondas. The service manual recommendations may get the CoO (cost of
ownership) down for the Consumer Reports types but it looks negligent to me.

Oil & Filter with tire rotation each 3,750
Lube locks, hinges, window rubbers each 7,500
Trans fluid change every 15,000
Diff (VTM-4) fluid change every 30,000 (after the initial 7,500 mile
break-in change)
Air Filter and Brake Fluid change every 30,000.
Plugs at 60,000 for platinum NGK's. 105K is just too long IMHO.
T-belt at 90,000.


nospam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for owner reviews of the Honda Pilot, as I'm considering
> buying one of the new 2004's. I'm comparing to Highlanders, Tauregs,
> and 4Runners...
>
> Any help/suggestions?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 14 Dec 2003, 07:10 pm
DragonRider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pilot vs. competitors?

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 23:04:58 GMT, ebco@(nospam)prodigy.net wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I'm looking for owner reviews of the Honda Pilot, as I'm considering
>buying one of the new 2004's. I'm comparing to Highlanders, Tauregs,
>and 4Runners...


Toureg's are a different animal altogether and compete more with the
Acura MDX (a warmed over Pilot) both in price and execution. It also
just won Motor Trends SUV of the year. The 4-Runner is basically a
truck and similar to Honda carries about a 15% price just for the
badge alone. It jumped upmarket this year in price and in size so
it's not really in that group.

The three that fit the target you seem to be aiming at is the Toyota
Highlander, the Honda Pilot, and the Mitsubishi Endeavor. All of them
are based on car platforms, have similar amenities, etc. Motor Trend
and another magazine (automobile?) did a shootout not that long ago
with a few SUV's where the Endeavor came in 2nd behind the Murano
(Nissan), ahead of the BMW X-5 and WAY ahead of the Highlander. The
Pilot? Honda evidently withdrew from both tests when they learned who
they were competing against... Hmmmmm.... The Murano won based on the
new tech though the editors all listed that if you needed the space
(the Murry was the smallest by far) that it would have been 4th.

If you are serious about the market you'd do well to visit the three
dealerships and take all three out for an extended drive (preferably
overnight) and see how each fits what you are looking for.

Good luck and enjoy.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 14 Dec 2003, 08:11 pm
Pankoski
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pilot vs. competitors?

Do your homework. For me, the cost per mile is the determining factor.
Based on the premise that the Pilot and the Highlander should be trouble
free compared to the American made SUV's, and also get slightly better gas
mileage, I am almost convinced that the higher price and the arrogance of
the import car dealers is worth it for a 'calculated' cost per mile based on
'averages'. Almost. The money you don't spend on the more expensive
vehicle could be put in a bank account to use for the expected repair on the
cheaper vehicle. Never buy an extended warrantee, they always find some
small print that negates your qualification for a claim.
I am only considering slightly used vehicles. If the imports are so good
then a few miles and a couple of years of age shouldn't be a determining
factor should it. I will not buy a new vehicle.
My wife has a 2000 Bravada now and it has been relatively trouble free. It
has 55K now. They have the worst reviews by Consumers Digest. Not that I
believe everything they say, but they are a good guideline starting point.
Had some minor stuff covered under warranty and a $300 repair that I could
have done cheaply ($100) if I would have been at home to catch it. I was
away at work at the time and not due home for a couple of weeks so she had
to get it done at the dealers. It was a leaking transmission cooling line.
There are ton of 1 - 2 year old Bravada's and the equivalent other
GM's/Fords on the market with less than 30K for $20K - $25K. (I don't
even acknowledge the existence of Jeep/Chrysler). I can't find a similar
Pilot or Highlander for at least $5k more. The Nissan Pathfinder and
Murano are slightly cheaper, but still more than the US made stuff . I
wish I could convince my wife to look at a Subaru Forester, that is my
overall 1st choice, but she likes to be up high like in a bloody pickup
truck. I should mention that I don't often drive her Bravada, I prefer to
use my Del Sols, even in the snow. The Subaru's are compact and more car
like, yet are still AWD and very reliable and drive nice too. And Cheaper.
Good Luck in your decision. Oh, forget the VW, overpriced garbage.
nospam prodigy.net" <ebco@> wrote in message
news:tp6ntvg56ijauhqv1um179g3uvc548ck57@4ax.com...
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for owner reviews of the Honda Pilot, as I'm considering
> buying one of the new 2004's. I'm comparing to Highlanders, Tauregs,
> and 4Runners...
>
> Any help/suggestions?



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 15 Dec 2003, 06:50 am
tflfb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pilot vs. competitors?

That's allot of oil change maintenance.

Tom.
"Richard C" <noone@triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news%5Db.117674$Vu5.7639286@twister.southeast.rr .com...
> My wife has a 2003 Pilot that she's had a little over a year with no
> problems. One recall for a recalibrated SRS control unit. It just turned
> 15,000, I follow the 'traditional' Honda maintenance format in all our
> Hondas. The service manual recommendations may get the CoO (cost of
> ownership) down for the Consumer Reports types but it looks negligent to

me.
>
> Oil & Filter with tire rotation each 3,750
> Lube locks, hinges, window rubbers each 7,500
> Trans fluid change every 15,000
> Diff (VTM-4) fluid change every 30,000 (after the initial 7,500 mile
> break-in change)
> Air Filter and Brake Fluid change every 30,000.
> Plugs at 60,000 for platinum NGK's. 105K is just too long IMHO.
> T-belt at 90,000.
>
>
> nospam wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm looking for owner reviews of the Honda Pilot, as I'm considering
> > buying one of the new 2004's. I'm comparing to Highlanders, Tauregs,
> > and 4Runners...
> >
> > Any help/suggestions?

>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 15 Dec 2003, 12:18 pm
Richard C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pilot vs. competitors?

At 30,000+ I feel it's cheap insurance. We generally keep our vehicles
10+ years.

tflfb wrote:
> That's allot of oil change maintenance.
>
> Tom.
> "Richard C" <noone@triad.rr.com> wrote in message
> news%5Db.117674$Vu5.7639286@twister.southeast.rr .com...
>
>>My wife has a 2003 Pilot that she's had a little over a year with no
>>problems. One recall for a recalibrated SRS control unit. It just turned
>>15,000, I follow the 'traditional' Honda maintenance format in all our
>>Hondas. The service manual recommendations may get the CoO (cost of
>>ownership) down for the Consumer Reports types but it looks negligent to

>
> me.
>
>>Oil & Filter with tire rotation each 3,750
>>Lube locks, hinges, window rubbers each 7,500
>>Trans fluid change every 15,000
>>Diff (VTM-4) fluid change every 30,000 (after the initial 7,500 mile
>>break-in change)
>>Air Filter and Brake Fluid change every 30,000.
>>Plugs at 60,000 for platinum NGK's. 105K is just too long IMHO.
>>T-belt at 90,000.
>>
>>
>>nospam wrote:
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>I'm looking for owner reviews of the Honda Pilot, as I'm considering
>>>buying one of the new 2004's. I'm comparing to Highlanders, Tauregs,
>>>and 4Runners...
>>>
>>>Any help/suggestions?

>>

>
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'03 Pilot Ci Honda 1 0 03 Oct 2006 01:24 pm
Add NAV to 03 Pilot LX? Rocky Honda 2 14 05 Mar 2006 04:52 pm
Pilot Edward Hayes Honda 2 3 18 Jul 2004 06:11 pm
MDX vs Pilot BobT Honda 2 2 17 Jul 2004 03:10 am
MDX or Pilot?? WKH Honda 2 18 04 Oct 2003 01:17 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.