Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04 Dec 2003, 11:17 am
razingkane
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default New tire purchasing questions

I've got a 99 Accord EX 4 cyl sedan 89,280 miles. I'm starting to look for
new tires. Currently I have Toyo Spectrums and I really like them. I
figure technology has changed so I should at least look at other
manufactures. Living in Colorado means there's a need for the tires to deal
with snow. Not the deep stuff but light fluff which unfortunately turns to
ice when driven on so there's really not much I can do about that. While
handling is very important to me having a quite tire is important too. I
drive to California 2-3 times a year. The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these tires
or have other recommendation? The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
aspects (MXV4 + energy). Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without messing
anything up?

TIA,

Rick


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04 Dec 2003, 12:52 pm
Pete
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: New tire purchasing questions


"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:76Jzb.8853
> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these

tires
> or have other recommendation?


I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.

The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.


> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
> aspects (MXV4 + energy).


Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.


> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without

messing
> anything up?


You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
slightly due to higher rolling resistance.

Cheers,

Pete


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04 Dec 2003, 01:39 pm
David
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: New tire purchasing questions

I put Turanza LSTs on my 01 Odyssey two weeks ago. No snow out east
yet, but I've put 1000+ miles on now and like them. Quiet, well rated.

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:52:50 +0100, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
>"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>news:76Jzb.8853
>> The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
>> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these

>tires
>> or have other recommendation?

>
>I've heard good things about the Turanza LS as well. Apparently very quiet,
>too. As far as FZ4 - their winter traction is not so good - they're more
>dry performance oriented, albeit still all-season.
>
>The best all-season tire in terms of winter performance is currently Nokian
>WR, in my opinion. I just got a set of those for my g/f's Jetta in
>Wisconsin (she refuses to use dedicated winter tires, so the WR is the next
>best thing), 195/65/15, H-rated.
>
>
>> The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
>> aspects (MXV4 + energy).

>
>Heh... I had the same feelings. The worst all-season tires I've ever had.
>
>
>> Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is there
>> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without

>messing
>> anything up?

>
>You could plus-zero size to 205/60/15. It'll give you slightly more dry
>grip and stability at higher speeds. It may increase fuel consumption
>slightly due to higher rolling resistance.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Pete
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06 Dec 2003, 12:37 pm
IT_Doc
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: New tire purchasing questions

In article <76Jzb.8853$zL1.1902752@news1.news.adelphia.net> ,
razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net says...
> I'm starting to look for
> new tires
>

The November or December issue of Consumer Reports has a comparison of
tires - ice and snow traction are included. The test car was a 6th
generation Accord, so the results are especially relevant.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11 Dec 2003, 10:45 pm
Chris
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: New tire purchasing questions

Don't know why your OEM Michelin's were so bad, but I just put a set of
Michelin HydroEdge tires on my 2000 Civic (185/65/14). HydroEdge tires are
relatively new to the market, and I only have about 1000 miles on 'em, but
so far they seem awesome. Really great handling in rain/wet snow, & living
in Canada, I was comforted to know that the HydroEdge has one of the lowest
freeze-points of any tires out there. It's cold up here!
-chris

"razingkane" <razingkaneDELETEME@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:76Jzb.8853$zL1.1902752@news1.news.adelphia.ne t...
> I've got a 99 Accord EX 4 cyl sedan 89,280 miles. I'm starting to look

for
> new tires. Currently I have Toyo Spectrums and I really like them. I
> figure technology has changed so I should at least look at other
> manufactures. Living in Colorado means there's a need for the tires to

deal
> with snow. Not the deep stuff but light fluff which unfortunately turns

to
> ice when driven on so there's really not much I can do about that. While
> handling is very important to me having a quite tire is important too. I
> drive to California 2-3 times a year. The Bridgestone Turanza LS and Toyo
> Proxes FZ4 are at the top of my list. Anyone running either of these

tires
> or have other recommendation? The OEM Michelins were terrible in all
> aspects (MXV4 + energy). Also, do I have to stay with 195/65/15? Is

there
> any reason to change the tire size, if so, what can I go to without

messing
> anything up?
>
> TIA,
>
> Rick
>
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tire Questions (Bridgestone Potenza RE92) CDMA Honda 2 9 09 Jul 2006 10:12 pm
purchasing 2003 EX Civic.. Help! eschafer@mts.net Honda 3 1 25 Jun 2005 08:44 am
2001 TL Tire Questions Bruno Acura 2 29 Jan 2005 09:43 pm
Need advice for purchasing new Honda Adrian Honda 2 4 09 Nov 2004 11:10 pm
Prelude purchasing advice P Pierre Honda 3 2 06 Jan 2004 06:44 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.