Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02 Dec 2003, 08:53 am
Peter Lowrie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default About LED indicators and tail-lights

Good Morning

Firstly, may I be excused for this blatant cross-post, however the
discussion that follows may be of interest to readers with regard to the
burgeoning use of Light Emitting Diodes in automotive applications that
spans the gamut of manufacturers...

The item I am going to detail has many other uses in addition to
tail-lights, courtesy lights, indicators et al, including but not limited
to traffic lights - see, this is on topic - IR illumination, industrial LED
signalling applications and many, many more.

Updates and further information may be obtained in other groups including
sci.engr.lighting.

Scenario: You want brake lights to double as tail-lights using the same LED
array, how do you do it?

http://www.geocities.com/ledaccelerator details a new invention that
provides a method to make otherwise dull LED's much brighter, allows LED's
to be used at two luminosity levels so making the ubiquitous LED a lot more
useful...And allows LED's to be overpowered without letting the smoke out
(blowing up).

The invention, or rights to it are for sale probably rendering this post as
an advertisement. In any case I will respond to responsible criticism.

Thank you for your indulgence.

Peter Lowrie
++64-4-9766712

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03 Dec 2003, 10:43 am
Alien Zord
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: About LED indicators and tail-lights

"Peter Lowrie" <peterlowrie@consultant.com> wrote in message
news:rP0zb.10986$ws.1018473@news02.tsnz.net...
> snip <
> http://www.geocities.com/ledaccelerator details a new invention that
> provides a method to make otherwise dull LED's much brighter, allows LED's
> to be used at two luminosity levels so making the ubiquitous LED a lot

more
> useful...And allows LED's to be overpowered without letting the smoke out
> (blowing up).
> snip <
>
>

And what a load of rubbish it all is.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03 Dec 2003, 12:39 pm
Lee Cremeans
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: About LED indicators and tail-lights

Alien Zord wrote:
> "Peter Lowrie" <peterlowrie@consultant.com> wrote in message
> news:rP0zb.10986$ws.1018473@news02.tsnz.net...
>
>>snip <
>>http://www.geocities.com/ledaccelerator details a new invention that
>>provides a method to make otherwise dull LED's much brighter, allows LED's
>>to be used at two luminosity levels so making the ubiquitous LED a lot

>
> more
>
>>useful...And allows LED's to be overpowered without letting the smoke out
>>(blowing up).
>>snip <
>>
>>

> And what a load of rubbish it all is.


What it sounds like he's doing is using a chopper circuit to run 5V LEDs
on another power source at perhaps a slight overvoltage. It's Voltage
Regulation 101, and really nothing special from what I can tell.

Besides, you can do the two-level brightness thing with a divider
network if you were so inclined. Resistors are cheap.

-lee
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03 Dec 2003, 01:06 pm
René
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: About LED indicators and tail-lights

Lee Cremeans wrote:
> Besides, you can do the two-level brightness thing with a divider
> network if you were so inclined. Resistors are cheap.


Faced with coming up with a solution for "visible taillight/bright
brake brakelight combo unit based on LEDs", I'd just go with two
different grids of LEDs. 30% of all LEDs in the housing are ON for the
normal taillight function, the remaining 70% will be switched on once
the brakes are activated.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03 Dec 2003, 01:38 pm
Alien Zord
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: About LED indicators and tail-lights

"Lee Cremeans" <lee@lcremeans.homeip.net> wrote in message
news:X6-dndu8_JYrglOiRVn-jA@speakeasy.net...
> Alien Zord wrote:
> > "Peter Lowrie" <peterlowrie@consultant.com> wrote in message
> > news:rP0zb.10986$ws.1018473@news02.tsnz.net...
> >
> >>snip <
> >>http://www.geocities.com/ledaccelerator details a new invention that
> >>provides a method to make otherwise dull LED's much brighter, allows

LED's
> >>to be used at two luminosity levels so making the ubiquitous LED a lot

> >
> > more
> >
> >>useful...And allows LED's to be overpowered without letting the smoke

out
> >>(blowing up).
> >>snip <
> >>
> >>

> > And what a load of rubbish it all is.

>
> What it sounds like he's doing is using a chopper circuit to run 5V LEDs
> on another power source at perhaps a slight overvoltage. It's Voltage
> Regulation 101, and really nothing special from what I can tell.
>
> Besides, you can do the two-level brightness thing with a divider
> network if you were so inclined. Resistors are cheap.
>
>

The OP has cross-posted this in many NGs including some electronics ones and
it transpires that he does not even know a basic Ohm's law. He's no doubt
picked up a current pulsing circuit (PWM of some form) from some beginners
guide to electronics book and pretends that its his own 'invention' and is
trying to sell it for a close to a million bucks.
http://www.geocities.com/ledaccelerator/outright.html
What a laugh. In another post he claims to have invented an engine running
on water:
http://www.google.com/groups?q=autho...snz.net&rnum=3
Come to think of it, our forefathers did that! Its called the water wheel!


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03 Dec 2003, 10:22 pm
clare @ snyder.on .ca
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: About LED indicators and tail-lights

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:06:29 GMT, "René"
<garbagejunkandcrap@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Lee Cremeans wrote:
>> Besides, you can do the two-level brightness thing with a divider
>> network if you were so inclined. Resistors are cheap.

>
>Faced with coming up with a solution for "visible taillight/bright
>brake brakelight combo unit based on LEDs", I'd just go with two
>different grids of LEDs. 30% of all LEDs in the housing are ON for the
>normal taillight function, the remaining 70% will be switched on once
>the brakes are activated.


LEDs can be overdriven significantly with a PWM type supply, as the
AVERAGE current is what is most critical. Higher current short term
pulses make the led much brighter than the lower constant current. The
led does not blow because the AVERAGE current is still less than the
rated current.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04 Dec 2003, 03:35 pm
Peter Lowrie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: About LED indicators and tail-lights

clare @ snyder.on .ca wrote:

> LEDs can be overdriven significantly with a PWM type supply, as the
> AVERAGE current is what is most critical. Higher current short term
> pulses make the led much brighter than the lower constant current. The
> led does not blow because the AVERAGE current is still less than the
> rated current.


Clare,

A phenominally astute observation - not one other person has figured this
out. You are to be applauded! But with respect to the way the module works
in practice - that is just less than 1/2 of the equation.

Peter Lowrie
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04 Dec 2003, 03:41 pm
Brian Smith
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: About LED indicators and tail-lights


"Peter Lowrie" <peterlowrie@consultant.com> wrote in message
news:rP0zb.10986$ws.1018473@news02.tsnz.net...

<snipped>

> Scenario: You want brake lights to double as tail-lights using the same

LED
> array, how do you do it?


You purchase the LED fixture designed to do that particular job. They've
been available here for years.

--
Brian
www.accesswave.ca/~orion



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06 Dec 2003, 02:25 am
Peter Lowrie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Oh really

Alien Zord wrote:

> "Peter Lowrie" <peterlowrie@consultant.com> wrote in message
> news:rP0zb.10986$ws.1018473@news02.tsnz.net...
>> snip <
>> http://www.geocities.com/ledaccelerator details a new invention that
>> provides a method to make otherwise dull LED's much brighter, allows

LED's
>> to be used at two luminosity levels so making the ubiquitous LED a lot

> more
>> useful...And allows LED's to be overpowered without letting the smoke out
>> (blowing up).
>> snip <
>>
>>

> And what a load of rubbish it all is.


<FMywb.9505$ws.848493@news02.tsnz.net>
<bpue8e$1skdgj$2@ID-183327.news.uni-berlin.de> <3fc32e19@clear.net.nz>

Adam Aglionby wrote:

> As some of you may have noticed I have been a vocal critic of Mr Lowrie

and his claimed LED Accelerator.

> In sci.engr.lighting I offered to send Mr Lowrie, with return postage

paid,a disposable camera to take photographs of this development.

> Mr Lowrie retains copyright of his photographs but I have licence to use

them with appropriate credit in any commentary I may have on the device.

> Mr Lowrie has accepted this offer and has told me that the photographs

will include Voltage, Current Lux and nM meter readings with his device
connected.

> I remain verey very sceptical about this device but will make whatever

photographs I obtain available to sci.engr.lighting, sci.electronics.design
and www.candlepowerforums.com

Adam

Peter Lowrie follows up:

http://www.geocities.com/ledaccelerator/9/index.html
....Is what it's all about.

So that's all good and proper, thank you Adam. As it turns out you are not
only a scholar but a gentleman also. Scott Stephens has been scratching his
head, Daniel Stern ever the businessman trusts no-one and Clives LED
teleporter sounds amazing...LOL.

Still a prototype sits atop the oscilloscope over there on the corner of my
table as it has been for about four weeks now shining away in two modes -
'accelerated' and non. Not one LED has gone Poof, snap, crackle or Pop!

Whereas component values won't be displayed, I'll also shoot a temperature
measurement on the bright LED's for you. Adam didn't mention input voltages
which I will be able to show in photographs - that the unit is running from
a 9 volt supply. Hope is I can photograph it all in such a manner as to not
give a secret away and clear enough so that Daniel will be able to trace
the test leads back to instruments thus verifying that no skulduggery is
afoot. I do not want to lead you gentlemen astray and given the pressure
exerted by way of your (and other posters) various dubious assertions of
malfeasance and snake charming, methinks any lesser mortal or fraudster
would have shrunk back into some dark recess, disappearing from view by
now.

You all have available comprehensive information from links on the site
regarding my various exploits, endeavours and accomplishments by way of a
downloadable CV. Terms like; open book, spring to mind.

Oh, by the way, an offer arrived yesterday which I will consider in due
course. :-)

Yours etc
Peter Lowrie

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08 Dec 2003, 03:51 pm
Dave Wood
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: About LED indicators and tail-lights

How revolutionary. It would look nice next to my worm hole generator on my
work bench. I too have an oscilloscope not only that I know how to use it.
Funny I also got an LED to glow really brightly powered from a 0-30V PSU,
although what that has to do with thermocouples has me and Dr Who at a loss.
A bit of experimentation showed I could get it very bright it only cost me a
few blown LEDs. The reduced life span is not a worry as they are cheap and
last years anyway. A PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) could also do the job a
quite high overvoltage could be achieved and the pulse width changed to
prevent the LED overheating. As Ohms law tells us this will chuck more
current through the device until it melts, shorten pulse width to allow
enough cool et voila. The human eye is all that is required to do the rest.
How do you think a TV works? It is not a steady picture but one dot moved
very quickly, the human eye can only detect flashes of less than 25Hz that
and the phosphor coating so the picture looks steady. After reading this I
tried the same in my garage and blow me down with a feather it works. The
LED is brighter to the human eye. I'll give you $1 for it. Unlike my worm
hole generator which at the moment is only lacking around $25Bn and a
compact singularity power source.
Odd you haven't got funding for this yet is it not. A quick trip to Philips
and a demo should secure funds. Where do you thing they got the idea for
Stargate (tm) the series, after a trip to my garage of course. However
theirs is not real and they had to fudge it with an Alien device to make it
work.
Oh on another note, a friend of mine has a torch that does exactly this to
overdrive an array of LEDs they do flash but most of the time look rock
steady and very bright. It cost only a few $s from Hong Kong.
I hope you find an investor, then I hope they get killed in a freak accident
so they do not pass the stupid or gullible gene on to another generation. Oh
how fickle humans are.

Try harder next time
Dave


"Alien Zord" <rem.alienzord@dsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:bql0b3$238t89$1@ID-172721.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "Peter Lowrie" <peterlowrie@consultant.com> wrote in message
> news:rP0zb.10986$ws.1018473@news02.tsnz.net...
> > snip <
> > http://www.geocities.com/ledaccelerator details a new invention that
> > provides a method to make otherwise dull LED's much brighter, allows

LED's
> > to be used at two luminosity levels so making the ubiquitous LED a lot

> more
> > useful...And allows LED's to be overpowered without letting the smoke

out
> > (blowing up).
> > snip <
> >
> >

> And what a load of rubbish it all is.
>
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'91 Accord: no dashboard lights, nor tail lights. wannadoitmyself Honda 3 3 17 Jul 2006 03:07 pm
Re: tail lights TSTRONG Honda 3 0 15 Jan 2006 06:15 am
tail lights basehit20 Honda 3 3 12 Nov 2005 10:32 pm
TAIL LIGHTS TaniC Honda 2 1 24 Mar 2005 05:32 pm
Re: Foggy tail lights... Chris & Brandie Honda 2 1 02 Jul 2003 02:22 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.