Honda Car Forum

Swinton - Car Insurance

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Honda Parts Search  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08 Nov 2003, 01:44 am
Dave Kelsen
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2003 Accord rotors

Just thought I'd relate a positive story for once. Having read about
some others here who had had a similar problem, I took some research and
documentation to my dealer, along with my car, a 2003 Accord LX 4 door 4
cylinder, because at 9 months old the whole car shook when braking from
high speed. It clearly needed the rotors turned.

I informed the service manager at the dealer that although my car had
30,000 miles on the clock, they were highway miles (obviously, in only
nine months), and the brakes were used very rarely and very sparingly.
As a result, I believed that Honda should pay for the fix. He said he
couldn't promise anything, but he'd check with Honda. I told him to go
ahead, and I would pay if I had to, as the job needed to be done.

When I picked up my car, the rotors had been turned, the pads had been
replaced, and there was no charge. The service manager said that there
had been some bulletins on the problem.

I don't have too many good experiences at the dealer. This was excellent.


RFT!!!
Dave Kelsen
--
If I'm going to hell anyway, why should it matter if it's in a handbasket?

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08 Nov 2003, 07:26 am
Knuckles Muldoon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2003 Accord rotors

On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 06:44:58 GMT, Dave Kelsen <kelsen@elmore.rr.com>
wrote:

>Just thought I'd relate a positive story for once. Having read about
>some others here who had had a similar problem, I took some research and
>documentation to my dealer, along with my car, a 2003 Accord LX 4 door 4
>cylinder, because at 9 months old the whole car shook when braking from
>high speed. It clearly needed the rotors turned.
>
>I informed the service manager at the dealer that although my car had
>30,000 miles on the clock, they were highway miles (obviously, in only
>nine months), and the brakes were used very rarely and very sparingly.
>As a result, I believed that Honda should pay for the fix. He said he
>couldn't promise anything, but he'd check with Honda. I told him to go
>ahead, and I would pay if I had to, as the job needed to be done.
>
>When I picked up my car, the rotors had been turned, the pads had been
>replaced, and there was no charge. The service manager said that there
>had been some bulletins on the problem.
>
>I don't have too many good experiences at the dealer. This was excellent.
>
>
>RFT!!!
>Dave Kelsen



I had the exact same problem, but at 30,000kms. They weren't going to
do it under warranty until I bitched to Honda. My concern is, is this
going to happen every 30,000kms? Pads should not wear out after
30,000kms! I asked my mechanic to find alternatives if Honda wasn't
going to cover it and he checked, but there are no aftermarket yet.

Jody
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09 Nov 2003, 05:01 pm
Alex Moloney
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2003 Accord rotors

i took my 2003 accord to get its second service done at 16000 kms and they
said i need my rear pads replaced as they were at 15% - i paid to get it
done - i then asked a buddy of mine who's a mechanic and said that the
fronts always wear out before the rears and shouldn't need replacing after
only 16000 kms

talked to my dealer and they are going to refund the money after i kicked up
a bit of a fuss
the dealer said the pads are a new type? and softer and therefore wear out
quicker - but admitted they shoudn't wear out as quick as they did

alex

"Knuckles Muldoon" <mortimersnurd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:r6lpqv4epsdka3794lrrdh2thnn0p9h5k1@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 06:44:58 GMT, Dave Kelsen <kelsen@elmore.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Just thought I'd relate a positive story for once. Having read about
> >some others here who had had a similar problem, I took some research and
> >documentation to my dealer, along with my car, a 2003 Accord LX 4 door 4
> >cylinder, because at 9 months old the whole car shook when braking from
> >high speed. It clearly needed the rotors turned.
> >
> >I informed the service manager at the dealer that although my car had
> >30,000 miles on the clock, they were highway miles (obviously, in only
> >nine months), and the brakes were used very rarely and very sparingly.
> >As a result, I believed that Honda should pay for the fix. He said he
> >couldn't promise anything, but he'd check with Honda. I told him to go
> >ahead, and I would pay if I had to, as the job needed to be done.
> >
> >When I picked up my car, the rotors had been turned, the pads had been
> >replaced, and there was no charge. The service manager said that there
> >had been some bulletins on the problem.
> >
> >I don't have too many good experiences at the dealer. This was

excellent.
> >
> >
> >RFT!!!
> >Dave Kelsen

>
>
> I had the exact same problem, but at 30,000kms. They weren't going to
> do it under warranty until I bitched to Honda. My concern is, is this
> going to happen every 30,000kms? Pads should not wear out after
> 30,000kms! I asked my mechanic to find alternatives if Honda wasn't
> going to cover it and he checked, but there are no aftermarket yet.
>
> Jody



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10 Nov 2003, 05:57 am
Knuckles Muldoon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2003 Accord rotors

On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 22:01:19 GMT, "Alex Moloney"
<alexmoloney@rogers.com> wrote:

>i took my 2003 accord to get its second service done at 16000 kms and they
>said i need my rear pads replaced as they were at 15% - i paid to get it
>done - i then asked a buddy of mine who's a mechanic and said that the
>fronts always wear out before the rears and shouldn't need replacing after
>only 16000 kms
>
>talked to my dealer and they are going to refund the money after i kicked up
>a bit of a fuss
>the dealer said the pads are a new type? and softer and therefore wear out
>quicker - but admitted they shoudn't wear out as quick as they did
>
>alex
>
>"Knuckles Muldoon" <mortimersnurd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:r6lpqv4epsdka3794lrrdh2thnn0p9h5k1@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 06:44:58 GMT, Dave Kelsen <kelsen@elmore.rr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Just thought I'd relate a positive story for once. Having read about
>> >some others here who had had a similar problem, I took some research and
>> >documentation to my dealer, along with my car, a 2003 Accord LX 4 door 4
>> >cylinder, because at 9 months old the whole car shook when braking from
>> >high speed. It clearly needed the rotors turned.
>> >
>> >I informed the service manager at the dealer that although my car had
>> >30,000 miles on the clock, they were highway miles (obviously, in only
>> >nine months), and the brakes were used very rarely and very sparingly.
>> >As a result, I believed that Honda should pay for the fix. He said he
>> >couldn't promise anything, but he'd check with Honda. I told him to go
>> >ahead, and I would pay if I had to, as the job needed to be done.
>> >
>> >When I picked up my car, the rotors had been turned, the pads had been
>> >replaced, and there was no charge. The service manager said that there
>> >had been some bulletins on the problem.
>> >
>> >I don't have too many good experiences at the dealer. This was

>excellent.
>> >
>> >
>> >RFT!!!
>> >Dave Kelsen

>>
>>
>> I had the exact same problem, but at 30,000kms. They weren't going to
>> do it under warranty until I bitched to Honda. My concern is, is this
>> going to happen every 30,000kms? Pads should not wear out after
>> 30,000kms! I asked my mechanic to find alternatives if Honda wasn't
>> going to cover it and he checked, but there are no aftermarket yet.
>>
>> Jody

>



I have a 1996 Dodge Neon with 228,000kms on it (my daughter now
drives) it still has original back pads!

As soon as aftermarket cross drilled/slotted rotors are available, I'm
grabbing them. And pads that don't throw so much dust!

Jody
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 18 Apr 2004, 05:30 pm
James M. Kelly
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2003 Accord rotors

The lug nuts need to be hand torqued with a torque wrench and not done with
one of those color coded snap-on air gun sockets. You should have been
given new rotors and not having the old ones turned. When you have your
tires rotated, specify you want the lug nuts hand torqued. Have it put on
the bill pay extra for it--it is insurance that the shuddering will go away.
The 98 Nissan Maxima had a service bulletin about this issue. When a dealer
turns a rotor it is pure profit for them. New rotors cost about $50. each
"Dave Kelsen" <kelsen@elmore.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Kh0rb.808$O2.36794@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
> Just thought I'd relate a positive story for once. Having read about
> some others here who had had a similar problem, I took some research and
> documentation to my dealer, along with my car, a 2003 Accord LX 4 door 4
> cylinder, because at 9 months old the whole car shook when braking from
> high speed. It clearly needed the rotors turned.
>
> I informed the service manager at the dealer that although my car had
> 30,000 miles on the clock, they were highway miles (obviously, in only
> nine months), and the brakes were used very rarely and very sparingly.
> As a result, I believed that Honda should pay for the fix. He said he
> couldn't promise anything, but he'd check with Honda. I told him to go
> ahead, and I would pay if I had to, as the job needed to be done.
>
> When I picked up my car, the rotors had been turned, the pads had been
> replaced, and there was no charge. The service manager said that there
> had been some bulletins on the problem.
>
> I don't have too many good experiences at the dealer. This was excellent.
>
>
> RFT!!!
> Dave Kelsen
> --
> If I'm going to hell anyway, why should it matter if it's in a handbasket?
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2003 Honda Accord Break Rotors hokie_dawg Honda 2 4 24 Jan 2007 12:20 pm
2003 Honda Accord Break Rotors hokie_dawg Honda 3 9 24 Jan 2007 12:20 pm
Removing '91 Accord Rotors ???? HELP! G-Man Honda 2 4 06 Mar 2004 01:20 pm
90 accord rotors and boots Mark30h Honda 3 6 26 Sep 2003 03:05 am
disk rotors 2003 accord Thudd Honda 3 8 24 Sep 2003 07:21 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 © 2007, Crawlability, Inc.