Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07 Oct 2008, 08:21 am
dgk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Two new tires, front or back?

On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:48:02 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
<Siskuwihane1@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Oct 6, 10:39*pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>> > On Oct 6, 3:20 pm, dgk <d...@somewhere.com> wrote:
>> >> I was going to get two new tires for my 91 Accord at Costco. They will
>> >> only mount new tires on the rear if you only get two. Apparently a
>> >> study tells them that the better tires should be on the rear to
>> >> prevent fishtailing. Odd, I would think that the front would be
>> >> better, having the steering, power, and brakes. So which is better?

>>
>> > New on the rear and here's why...

>>
>> > From Tire Rack:

>>
>> >http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=52

>>
>> > Intuition suggests that since the front tires wore out first and
>> > because there is still about half of the tread remaining on the rear
>> > tires, the new tires should be installed on the front axle. This will
>> > provide more wet and wintry traction; and by the time the front tires
>> > have worn out for the second time, the rear tires will be worn out,
>> > too. However in this case, intuition isn't right...and following it
>> > can be downright dangerous.

>>
>> > When tires are replaced in pairs in situations like these, the new
>> > tires should always be installed on the rear axle and the partially
>> > worn tires moved to the front. The reason is because new tires on the
>> > rear axle help the driver more easily maintain control on wet roads
>> > since deeper treaded tires are better at resisting hydroplaning.

>>
>> > Members of Tire Rack team had the chance to experience this phenomenon
>> > at Michelin's Laurens Proving Grounds. Participants were allowed to
>> > drive around a large radius, wet curve in vehicles fitted with tires
>> > of different tread depths -- one vehicle with new tires on the rear
>> > and half-worn tires on the front and the other with the new tires in
>> > the front and half-worn tires on the rear.

>>
>> > It didn't take long for this hands-on experience to confirm that the
>> > "proving grounds" name for the facility was correct. The ability to
>> > sense and control predictable understeer with the new tires on the
>> > rear and the helplessness in trying to control the surprising
>> > oversteer

>>
>> oversteer on a honda???? *obviously they're not talking about fwd vehicles.

>
>Obviously they are talking about old tire position and wet conditons
>causing the oversteer (which is fully explained in the link that was
>provided). Michelin tests were done using FWD vehicles and are
>available on their website videos.
>
>http://www.michelinman.ca/care/buy_how.html#a3
>
>Contact them if you want to argue the results.
>
>
>


How about if I don't use michelin tires? Nah, I suppose it's the same.

I did skid a few weeks ago on a wet road while approaching an exit too
fast, which was one reason I was thinking of new tires. The article
explained it well; the front is hydroplaning a bit and it was easy to
control. Many years ago I fishtailed going around a curve and it was
much harder to control. For those familiar with New York roads, it was
that nasty curve heading into the Bronx over the Whitestone Bridge,
past the tool booths, leading onto the Cross Bronx Expressway.

There are often spinouts on that curve.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07 Oct 2008, 08:24 am
Brian Smith
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Two new tires, front or back?

dgk wrote:
>
> I did skid a few weeks ago on a wet road while approaching an exit too
> fast, which was one reason I was thinking of new tires. The article
> explained it well; the front is hydroplaning a bit and it was easy to
> control. Many years ago I fishtailed going around a curve and it was
> much harder to control. For those familiar with New York roads, it was
> that nasty curve heading into the Bronx over the Whitestone Bridge,
> past the tool booths, leading onto the Cross Bronx Expressway.
>
> There are often spinouts on that curve.


Slow down and drive responsibly.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08 Oct 2008, 02:29 am
z
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Two new tires, front or back?

On Oct 6, 3:37*pm, "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLE...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> New tires on rear is correct.
>
> "dgk" <d...@somewhere.com> wrote in message
>
> newsvoke4pjigefmdsp259pithjjqoe7q1gf2@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> >I was going to get two new tires for my 91 Accord at Costco. They will
> > only mount new tires on the rear if you only get two. Apparently a
> > study tells them that the better tires should be on the rear to
> > prevent fishtailing. Odd, I would think that the front would be
> > better, having the steering, power, and brakes. So which is better?

>
> > I decided my tires are good enough for a while longer and left. I had
> > gotten a flat and decided that maybe I should just get new tires.
> > Oddly, the place I went to to fix the flat (Costco would only fix
> > flats on their tires!) couldn't find a hole. I must have bumped a curb
> > or something and caused the leak.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -


the exception being when you are getting tires which aren't the same
as the old ones, and have less grip; like when you have purchased the
road hazard warranty from firestone and two tires get hazarded at the
same time but for some reason the factory hasn't got any potenzas
available anywhere so they give you a couple of other bridgestones to
fulfill your road hazard warranty, but i digress.

anyway, they insisted on putting the new tires on the rear, and it was
definitely squiggly feeling, especially in the rain; putting the new
tires on the front and the old potenzas on the rear improved the
stability a lot at the cost of the front losing grip and the car
having serious terminal understeer, especially in the wet.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08 Oct 2008, 06:06 am
dgk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Two new tires, front or back?

On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:24:13 -0300, Brian Smith
<Halifax@NovaScotia.Canada> wrote:

>dgk wrote:
>>
>> I did skid a few weeks ago on a wet road while approaching an exit too
>> fast, which was one reason I was thinking of new tires. The article
>> explained it well; the front is hydroplaning a bit and it was easy to
>> control. Many years ago I fishtailed going around a curve and it was
>> much harder to control. For those familiar with New York roads, it was
>> that nasty curve heading into the Bronx over the Whitestone Bridge,
>> past the tool booths, leading onto the Cross Bronx Expressway.
>>
>> There are often spinouts on that curve.

>
> Slow down and drive responsibly.


Yup, I've been driving for 40 years so I'm pretty calm these days.
Still, it's best to have good tires.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08 Oct 2008, 07:20 am
Brian Smith
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Two new tires, front or back?

dgk wrote:
>
> Yup, I've been driving for 40 years so I'm pretty calm these days.
> Still, it's best to have good tires.


Agreed. But even with good tires, there is no substitute for driving
within the capability of yourself, the vehicle and the weather and road
conditions.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what size speakers go into a 97 honda civic ex front and back? Jesse W Honda Technical 2 06 Nov 2007 02:17 am
Screeching Noise Coming From Back Tires??? djmikey08 Acura Technical 3 01 Nov 2007 04:48 pm
99 Honda Crv has vibration in front tires at high speed but i had tires balanced, what is causing... gemeneye25@prodigy.net Honda Technical 5 28 Oct 2007 03:51 pm
Wider tires on back of 2001 Prelude? (215s) Bad??? Rob B Honda 3 6 17 Apr 2005 11:04 pm
Legend seat wont go back or front... WillyBigg Acura 0 15 Aug 2003 07:18 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.