Honda Car Forum

On Aug 19, 10:34*am, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:49:53 -0700, Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>> The majority of my posts are not archived
> >> eh? *then use a decent news feed.
> > Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
>
> Wow. *Talk about ignorance. *I guess you've never heard of the Google
> newsgroup archive, eh?

Yeah, let's talk about ignorance since you are showing yours, eh?

Post through Google and you can go back and delete them later, months
later, thus REMOVING them from the Google archive. POOF, they're gone,
just like that.

>This should be interesting for you to check:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q...hl=en&as_epq=&...

Yeah, it's interesting in that about 1100 posts are missing because I
deleted them, nice try though.

On Aug 19, 9:26*am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> Siskuwihane wrote:
> > On Aug 19, 12:11 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>> On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> mark wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi group,
> >>>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
> >>>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
> >>>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
> >>>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had to pay for?
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
> >>>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
> >>>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
> >>>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
> >>>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
> >>>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free report for
> >>>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
> >>>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
> >>>>> Is that a requirement?
> >>>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
> >>>> actually, it's not.
> >>>>> but some on here have to
> >>>>> act like total dickheads whenever it's requested.
> >>>> like being a freeloader's not?
> >>>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
> >>>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
> >>>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
> >>>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to thisgroup?- Hide quoted text -
> >>> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
> >>> user name, your point?
> >> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a free ride.
>
> > The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
> > some percieved misdeed.
> >> > The majority of my posts are not archived
>
> >> eh? then use a decent news feed.
>
> > Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
>
> jeepers, that's one of the dumbest statements of fundamental
> misunderstanding i've ever ever read on usenet. *and that's saying
> something.
>

See my reply to your buddy and learn something.

Siskuwihane wrote:
> On Aug 19, 9:26�am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>> On Aug 19, 12:11 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> mark wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
>>>>>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
>>>>>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had to pay for?
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
>>>>>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
>>>>>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
>>>>>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
>>>>>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
>>>>>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free report for
>>>>>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
>>>>>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
>>>>>>> Is that a requirement?
>>>>>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
>>>>>> actually, it's not.
>>>>>>> but some on here have to
>>>>>>> act like total dickheads whenever it's requested.
>>>>>> like being a freeloader's not?
>>>>>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
>>>>>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
>>>>>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
>>>>>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to this group?- Hide quoted text -
>>>>> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
>>>>> user name, your point?
>>>> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a free ride.
>>> The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
>>> some percieved misdeed.
>>>>> The majority of my posts are not archived
>>>> eh? then use a decent news feed.
>>> Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
>> jeepers, that's one of the dumbest statements of fundamental
>> misunderstanding i've ever ever read on usenet. �and that's saying
>> something.
>>
>
> See my reply to your buddy and learn something.

you don't understand. google is not the only usenet archive and
deletion from google's public database doesn't mean it's still not
accessible. fact is, your posting activities are most definitely still
on "real" usenet servers all across the globe. maybe you should think
about that next time you post...

On Aug 19, 10:34*pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> Siskuwihane wrote:
> > On Aug 19, 9:26 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>> On Aug 19, 12:11 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> mark wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi group,
> >>>>>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
> >>>>>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
> >>>>>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
> >>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had topay for?
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
> >>>>>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
> >>>>>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
> >>>>>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
> >>>>>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
> >>>>>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free report for
> >>>>>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
> >>>>>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
> >>>>>>> Is that a requirement?
> >>>>>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
> >>>>>> actually, it's not.
> >>>>>>> but some on here have to
> >>>>>>> act like total dickheads whenever it's requested.
> >>>>>> like being a freeloader's not?
> >>>>>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
> >>>>>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
> >>>>>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
> >>>>>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to this group?- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
> >>>>> user name, your point?
> >>>> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a freeride.
> >>> The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
> >>> some percieved misdeed.
> >>>>> The majority of my posts are not archived
> >>>> eh? then use a decent news feed.
> >>> Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
> >> jeepers, that's one of the dumbest statements of fundamental
> >> misunderstanding i've ever ever read on usenet. and that's saying
> >> something.
>
> > See my reply to your buddy and learn something.
>
> you don't understand. *google is not the only usenet archive and
> deletion from google's public database doesn't mean it's still not
> accessible. *fact is, your posting activities are most definitely still
> on "real" usenet servers all across the globe.

Yes, you are the only person who knows usenet and are a mission to
make others "understand".

No one gives a crap about those other archives, their retention rates
suck. That's why your cackling crow sidekick went straight for
Google, as expected.

>*maybe you should think about that next time you post...- Hide quoted text -

Don't have to, I'm not netcopping and indescrimately jumping on others
for percieved net infractions.

Go ahead and continue if you must (and you will because that's what
netcops and trolls do).

Siskuwihane wrote:
> On Aug 19, 10:34�pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>> On Aug 19, 9:26 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 19, 12:11 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>>>>>> On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> mark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had to pay for?
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
>>>>>>>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
>>>>>>>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
>>>>>>>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
>>>>>>>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free report for
>>>>>>>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
>>>>>>>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
>>>>>>>>> Is that a requirement?
>>>>>>>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
>>>>>>>> actually, it's not.
>>>>>>>>> but some on here have to
>>>>>>>>> act like total dickheads whenever it's requested.
>>>>>>>> like being a freeloader's not?
>>>>>>>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
>>>>>>>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
>>>>>>>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
>>>>>>>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to this group?- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
>>>>>>> user name, your point?
>>>>>> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a free ride.
>>>>> The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
>>>>> some percieved misdeed.
>>>>>>> The majority of my posts are not archived
>>>>>> eh? then use a decent news feed.
>>>>> Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
>>>> jeepers, that's one of the dumbest statements of fundamental
>>>> misunderstanding i've ever ever read on usenet. and that's saying
>>>> something.
>>> See my reply to your buddy and learn something.
>> you don't understand. �google is not the only usenet archive and
>> deletion from google's public database doesn't mean it's still not
>> accessible. �fact is, your posting activities are most definitely still
>> on "real" usenet servers all across the globe.
>
> Yes, you are the only person who knows usenet and are a mission to
> make others "understand".
>
> No one gives a crap about those other archives, their retention rates
> suck.

no so - some free servers don't retain long, but others are great archives.


> That's why your cackling crow sidekick went straight for
> Google, as expected.

no, you were the one crowing about "deleting" your posts. i simply
pointed out that you didn't understand the reality of your actions.



>
>> �maybe you should think about that next time you post...- Hide quoted text -
>
> Don't have to, I'm not netcopping and indescrimately jumping on others
> for percieved net infractions.

eh? suddenly, you're the victim of your own argument but it's someone
else's fault? that's stupid.

>
> Go ahead and continue if you must (and you will because that's what
> netcops and trolls do).

go ahead and disassociate yourself from your own problems there big guy!

On Aug 20, 9:33*am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> Siskuwihane wrote:
> > On Aug 19, 10:34 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>> On Aug 19, 9:26 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 19, 12:11 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> mark wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi group,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had to pay for?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
> >>>>>>>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free reportfor
> >>>>>>>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
> >>>>>>>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
> >>>>>>>>> Is that a requirement?
> >>>>>>>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
> >>>>>>>> actually, it's not.
> >>>>>>>>> but some on here have to
> >>>>>>>>> act like total dickheads whenever it's requested.
> >>>>>>>> like being a freeloader's not?
> >>>>>>>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
> >>>>>>>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
> >>>>>>>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
> >>>>>>>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to this group?- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
> >>>>>>> user name, your point?
> >>>>>> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a free ride.
> >>>>> The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
> >>>>> some percieved misdeed.
> >>>>>>> The majority of my posts are not archived
> >>>>>> eh? then use a decent news feed.
> >>>>> Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
> >>>> jeepers, that's one of the dumbest statements of fundamental
> >>>> misunderstanding i've ever ever read on usenet. and that's saying
> >>>> something.
> >>> See my reply to your buddy and learn something.
> >> you don't understand. google is not the only usenet archive and
> >> deletion from google's public database doesn't mean it's still not
> >> accessible. fact is, your posting activities are most definitely still
> >> on "real" usenet servers all across the globe.
>
> > Yes, you are the only person who knows *usenet and are a mission to
> > make others "understand".
>
> > No one gives a crap about those other archives, their retention rates
> > suck. *
>
> no so - some free servers don't retain long, but others are great archives.
>
> > That's why your cackling crow sidekick went straight for
> > Google, as expected.
>
> no, you were the one crowing about "deleting" your posts. *i simply
> pointed out that you didn't understand the reality of your actions.
>
>
>
> >> maybe you should think about that next time you post...- Hide quoted text -
>
> > Don't have to, I'm not netcopping and indescrimately jumping on others
> > for percieved net infractions.
>
> eh? *suddenly, you're the victim of your own argument but it's someone
> else's fault? *that's stupid.
>
>
>
> > Go ahead and continue if you must (and you will because that's what
> > netcops and trolls do).
>
> go ahead and disassociate yourself from your own problems there big guy!-Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Cackle! Cackle!

You never disappoint.