Honda Car Forum | |
|
|||
|
On 2008-07-18, jim beam <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote:
> here's my last oil analysis: > > aluminum 3 > chromium 1 > iron 23 > copper 6 > lead 2 > tin 0 > > cSt viscosity at 100C 10.18 > insolubles 0.3% > > what was my change interval? bonus points for the brand of oil. Mobil1 Full Synthetic, 12,000 miles... -- Joe - Linux User #449481/Ubuntu User #19733 joe at hits - buffalo dot com "Hate is baggage, life is too short to go around pissed off all the time..." - Danny, American History X |
|
|||
|
jim beam wrote:
> here's my last oil analysis: > > aluminum 3 > chromium 1 > iron 23 > copper 6 > lead 2 > tin 0 > > cSt viscosity at 100C 10.18 > insolubles 0.3% > > what was my change interval? bonus points for the brand of oil. 12,853 - Castrol GTX |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:02:57 -0700, jim beam wrote:
> here's my last oil analysis: > > aluminum 3 > chromium 1 > iron 23 > copper 6 > lead 2 > tin 0 > > cSt viscosity at 100C 10.18 > insolubles 0.3% > > what was my change interval? bonus points for the brand of oil. 2,850 miles, Pennzoil. -- "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
|
|||
|
"jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote in message news:PcidnVtGcuGOuR3VnZ2dnUVZ_s3inZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... > here's my last oil analysis: > > aluminum 3 > chromium 1 > iron 23 > copper 6 > lead 2 > tin 0 > > cSt viscosity at 100C 10.18 > insolubles 0.3% > > what was my change interval? bonus points for the brand of oil. 1,230 - Amzoil ;-) |
|
|||
|
On Jul 18, 1:02*am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> here's my last oil analysis: > > aluminum 3 > chromium 1 > iron 23 > copper 6 > lead 2 > tin 0 > > cSt viscosity at 100C 10.18 > insolubles 0.3% > > what was my change interval? *bonus points for the brand of oil. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.... Dan D '07 Ody EX Central NJ USA |
|
|||
|
jim beam wrote:
> here's my last oil analysis: > > aluminum 3 > chromium 1 > iron 23 > copper 6 > lead 2 > tin 0 > > cSt viscosity at 100C 10.18 > insolubles 0.3% > > what was my change interval? bonus points for the brand of oil. well, as the keen students of google were quickly able to ascertain, it was indeed 12k miles. full credits to to them, especially to joe who got the oil right, but i award a "good effort" to al for castrol since that is my #2 choice. those numbers are pretty darned good btw, and if you care to check other analysis figures from other engine types others have posted around the web, you'll realize that honda make a darned freakin' good engine based on the iron content. iron is mostly cam wear and numbers in the hundreds are not uncommon for other makes of engine. expanding further on the iron thing, the main reason i got this analysis done this time was because a couple of years ago, i had to do a quickie head gasket change, and simply didn't have the time to practice proper cleanliness. the cam got some grit on it, and thus got some big old scrape marks on it as some grit particles got trapped and dragged on around the lobes. i changed the oil again the following weekend, and left it thinking this would be my opportunity to go for a jdm motor change in the not too distant. well, here we are running mobil 1 a couple of changes later, the motor still runs like a champ, and the cam lobes look exactly identical, all scraped up!!! with a normal oil, i would have expected the worst of it to have worn down by now as part of the normal overall abrasion process. however, it appears that wear, even on these uneven surfaces, is absolutely minute. great oil - i recommend it. |
|
|||
|
jim beam wrote:
> jim beam wrote: >> here's my last oil analysis: >> >> aluminum 3 >> chromium 1 >> iron 23 >> copper 6 >> lead 2 >> tin 0 >> >> cSt viscosity at 100C 10.18 >> insolubles 0.3% >> >> what was my change interval? bonus points for the brand of oil. > > well, as the keen students of google were quickly able to ascertain, it > was indeed 12k miles. full credits to to them, especially to joe who > got the oil right, but i award a "good effort" to al for castrol since > that is my #2 choice. > > those numbers are pretty darned good btw, and if you care to check other > analysis figures from other engine types others have posted around the > web, you'll realize that honda make a darned freakin' good engine based > on the iron content. iron is mostly cam wear and numbers in the > hundreds are not uncommon for other makes of engine. > > expanding further on the iron thing, the main reason i got this analysis > done this time was because a couple of years ago, i had to do a quickie > head gasket change, and simply didn't have the time to practice proper > cleanliness. the cam got some grit on it, and thus got some big old > scrape marks on it as some grit particles got trapped and dragged on > around the lobes. i changed the oil again the following weekend, and > left it thinking this would be my opportunity to go for a jdm motor > change in the not too distant. well, here we are running mobil 1 a > couple of changes later, the motor still runs like a champ, and the cam > lobes look exactly identical, all scraped up!!! with a normal oil, i > would have expected the worst of it to have worn down by now as part of > the normal overall abrasion process. however, it appears that wear, as confirmed by the oil analysis, > even on these uneven surfaces, is absolutely minute. great oil - i > recommend it. |
|
|||
|
"jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote
> jim beam wrote: >> here's my last oil analysis: >> >> aluminum 3 >> chromium 1 >> iron 23 >> copper 6 >> lead 2 >> tin 0 >> >> cSt viscosity at 100C 10.18 >> insolubles 0.3% >> >> what was my change interval? bonus points for the brand >> of oil. > > well, as the keen students of google were quickly able to > ascertain, it was indeed 12k miles. What is it you claim tells a person that the interval was 12k miles? I looked at some of the Blackstone Lab reports for Hondas. What seems most telling about how the engine is doing are (1) how the analysis changes from one oil change to the next (for the given mileage interval) and (2) how the analysis compares to the universal averages for a set interval. |
|
|||
|
"jim beam" <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote
> jim beam wrote: >> here's my last oil analysis: >> >> aluminum 3 >> chromium 1 >> iron 23 >> copper 6 >> lead 2 >> tin 0 >> >> cSt viscosity at 100C 10.18 >> insolubles 0.3% >> >> what was my change interval? bonus points for the brand >> of oil. > > well, as the keen students of google were quickly able to > ascertain, it was indeed 12k miles. What is it you claim tells a person that the interval was 12k miles? I looked at some of the Blackstone Lab reports for Hondas. What seems most telling about how the engine is doing are (1) how the analysis changes from one oil change to the next (for the given mileage interval) and (2) how the analysis compares to the universal averages for a set interval. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| i have an acura and i want to modified it,but im cocern about the gas mileage.will i guess | ivan22 | Acura Technical | 2 | 10 Mar 2008 08:16 pm |
| Can you put a dual exhuast TIP on a 1994 honda accord? I guess the bumper doesnt allow? | hondaman | Honda Technical | 4 | 17 Jan 2008 08:16 pm |
| Is my gas mileage low? | hektor | Honda Technical | 11 | 04 Oct 2007 02:34 pm |
| price guess for honda civic 2006 si | SmithChart | Honda 2 | 13 | 15 Aug 2005 10:35 am |
| Low mileage 93 Del Sol SI: should timing belt change be based on time instead of mileage? | Honda 2 | 2 | 06 Mar 2004 09:40 am | |