Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
a wrote:
> Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote: >> In article <_FRii.14820$Io4.11389@edtnps89>, a <a@a.ca> wrote: >> >>> I have an '02 4cyl and, while a great trouble free car, it's a dog in terms >>> of power... >> >> I had an 00 Accord 4 cylinder, and it was a fantastic car with PLENTY of >> power. >> >> 'Course, I outfitted mine properly: with a manual transmission. >> >> In addition, that baby got 35mpg in the dead of summer on a road trip, >> AC on full blast, going through the mountains. >> > > Nothing wrong - mine is a 5 speed. > > You're 35mpg is horse shit, though. > > a I believe him. I routinely got 33mpg with a '93 Accord automatic. |
|
|||
|
Seth wrote:
> "a" <a@a.ca> wrote in message news:iYUii.21769$tB5.3923@edtnps90... >> Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote: >>> In article <_FRii.14820$Io4.11389@edtnps89>, a <a@a.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> I have an '02 4cyl and, while a great trouble free car, it's a dog >>>> in terms of power... >>> >>> I had an 00 Accord 4 cylinder, and it was a fantastic car with PLENTY >>> of power. >>> >>> 'Course, I outfitted mine properly: with a manual transmission. >>> >>> In addition, that baby got 35mpg in the dead of summer on a road >>> trip, AC on full blast, going through the mountains. >>> >> >> Nothing wrong - mine is a 5 speed. >> >> You're 35mpg is horse shit, though. > > > How so? I get almost 30mpg out of an '01 V6 with automatic. > How so? Because I don't believe his story, that's how so. Just because you *almost* get 30 mpg (what's *almost* 30mpg? 25? 29? 22? What?) doesn't mean jack in relation to someone else getting X+ mpg with their car. a |
|
|||
|
High Tech Misfit wrote:
> a wrote: > >> Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote: >>> In article <_FRii.14820$Io4.11389@edtnps89>, a <a@a.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> I have an '02 4cyl and, while a great trouble free car, it's a dog in terms >>>> of power... >>> I had an 00 Accord 4 cylinder, and it was a fantastic car with PLENTY of >>> power. >>> >>> 'Course, I outfitted mine properly: with a manual transmission. >>> >>> In addition, that baby got 35mpg in the dead of summer on a road trip, >>> AC on full blast, going through the mountains. >>> >> Nothing wrong - mine is a 5 speed. >> >> You're 35mpg is horse shit, though. >> >> a > > I believe him. I routinely got 33mpg with a '93 Accord automatic. Good for you - on road trips through the Swiss f-ing alps with the AC on? No? a |
|
|||
|
"a" <a@a.ca> wrote in message news:yDVii.28160$xk5.26728@edtnps82...
> Seth wrote: >> "a" <a@a.ca> wrote in message news:iYUii.21769$tB5.3923@edtnps90... >>> Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote: >>>> In article <_FRii.14820$Io4.11389@edtnps89>, a <a@a.ca> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have an '02 4cyl and, while a great trouble free car, it's a dog in >>>>> terms of power... >>>> >>>> I had an 00 Accord 4 cylinder, and it was a fantastic car with PLENTY >>>> of power. >>>> >>>> 'Course, I outfitted mine properly: with a manual transmission. >>>> >>>> In addition, that baby got 35mpg in the dead of summer on a road trip, >>>> AC on full blast, going through the mountains. >>>> >>> >>> Nothing wrong - mine is a 5 speed. >>> >>> You're 35mpg is horse shit, though. >> >> >> How so? I get almost 30mpg out of an '01 V6 with automatic. >> > > How so? Because I don't believe his story, that's how so. Just because > you *almost* get 30 mpg (what's *almost* 30mpg? 25? 29? 22? What?) > doesn't mean jack in relation to someone else getting X+ mpg with their > car. Consistently in the mid 29's is almost 30. Sometimes 29.2, sometimes 29.8. That's with a V6 with an auto. It's entirely believable to get 35 with an i4 manual. Yes, it does mean jack when comparing the 2 cause almost 30 on the car that is known to consistently get worse mileage means better mileage is to be expected form the other one. |
|
|||
|
"a" <a@a.ca> wrote in message news:8BVii.28159$xk5.21109@edtnps82...
> Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote: >> In article <iYUii.21769$tB5.3923@edtnps90>, a <a@a.ca> wrote: >> >>>> I had an 00 Accord 4 cylinder, and it was a fantastic car with PLENTY >>>> of power. >>>> >>>> 'Course, I outfitted mine properly: with a manual transmission. >>>> >>>> In addition, that baby got 35mpg in the dead of summer on a road trip, >>>> AC on full blast, going through the mountains. >>>> >>> Nothing wrong - mine is a 5 speed. >>> >>> You're 35mpg is horse shit, though. >> >> Nope. It happened on the way out, so I made sure to measure on the way >> back. >> >> Damn. What a car. >> > > Well, until Ernst & Young can audit your mileage, I'm still calling horse > shit. A road trip - through the mountains - AC on full... up hill BOTH > ... > > "It happened on the way out" - so you knew it happened on the way "out". > How? If you only measured it on the way *back* ...? > > Get real. I like my Accord, but I'm not delusional. Well, I happen to work for EY. Maybe someone can lend me theirs and I'll test the i4/manual for a month on my 75 mile each way commute. |
|
|||
|
Seth wrote:
> "a" <a@a.ca> wrote in message news:8BVii.28159$xk5.21109@edtnps82... >> Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote: >>> In article <iYUii.21769$tB5.3923@edtnps90>, a <a@a.ca> wrote: >>> >>>>> I had an 00 Accord 4 cylinder, and it was a fantastic car with >>>>> PLENTY of power. >>>>> >>>>> 'Course, I outfitted mine properly: with a manual transmission. >>>>> >>>>> In addition, that baby got 35mpg in the dead of summer on a road >>>>> trip, AC on full blast, going through the mountains. >>>>> >>>> Nothing wrong - mine is a 5 speed. >>>> >>>> You're 35mpg is horse shit, though. >>> >>> Nope. It happened on the way out, so I made sure to measure on the >>> way back. >>> >>> Damn. What a car. >>> >> >> Well, until Ernst & Young can audit your mileage, I'm still calling >> horse shit. A road trip - through the mountains - AC on full... up >> hill BOTH ... >> >> "It happened on the way out" - so you knew it happened on the way >> "out". How? If you only measured it on the way *back* ...? >> >> Get real. I like my Accord, but I'm not delusional. > > > Well, I happen to work for EY. Maybe someone can lend me theirs and > I'll test the i4/manual for a month on my 75 mile each way commute. > I'll let you drive you mine - I've got an 02 with the F23A1 engine. I've got just under 50,000km on it (30,860mi). Next time you're near Halifax, NS, Canada (eh!) I'll gladly lend you my car. a |
|
|||
|
In article <yDVii.28160$xk5.26728@edtnps82>, a <a@a.ca> wrote:
> >>> In addition, that baby got 35mpg in the dead of summer on a road > >>> trip, AC on full blast, going through the mountains. > >>> > >> > >> Nothing wrong - mine is a 5 speed. > >> > >> You're 35mpg is horse shit, though. > > > > > > How so? I get almost 30mpg out of an '01 V6 with automatic. > > > > How so? Because I don't believe his story, that's how so. Just because > you *almost* get 30 mpg (what's *almost* 30mpg? 25? 29? 22? What?) doesn't > mean jack in relation to someone else getting X+ mpg with their car. Sure it does. If an 01 V6 automatic trans car gets 30, it's well within his realm of believability that a 4 cylinder manual trans car gets 35 in the same circumstances. |
|
|||
|
In article <rEVii.28162$xk5.15548@edtnps82>, a <a@a.ca> wrote:
> >>> In addition, that baby got 35mpg in the dead of summer on a road trip, > >>> AC on full blast, going through the mountains. > >>> > >> Nothing wrong - mine is a 5 speed. > >> > >> You're 35mpg is horse shit, though. > >> > >> a > > > > I believe him. I routinely got 33mpg with a '93 Accord automatic. > > Good for you - on road trips through the Swiss f-ing alps with the AC on? > No? It happened. Get over it. Why does it bother you that this happened? |
|
|||
|
In article <8BVii.28159$xk5.21109@edtnps82>, a <a@a.ca> wrote:
> >> You're 35mpg is horse shit, though. > > > > Nope. It happened on the way out, so I made sure to measure on the way > > back. > > > > Damn. What a car. > > > > Well, until Ernst & Young can audit your mileage, I'm still calling horse > shit. A road trip - through the mountains - AC on full... up hill BOTH ... > > "It happened on the way out" - so you knew it happened on the way "out". > How? If you only measured it on the way *back* ...? No, I stopped after the mountains to get gas. I routinely check my mileage every time. I saw 35...and decided that I really should make double sure to check on the way back, to see if that was a fluke or not. And it happened on the way back, too. Your mother didn't breast feed you or something. |
|
|||
|
Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> In article <yDVii.28160$xk5.26728@edtnps82>, a <a@a.ca> wrote: > >>>>> In addition, that baby got 35mpg in the dead of summer on a road >>>>> trip, AC on full blast, going through the mountains. >>>>> >>>> Nothing wrong - mine is a 5 speed. >>>> >>>> You're 35mpg is horse shit, though. >>> >>> How so? I get almost 30mpg out of an '01 V6 with automatic. >>> >> How so? Because I don't believe his story, that's how so. Just because >> you *almost* get 30 mpg (what's *almost* 30mpg? 25? 29? 22? What?) doesn't >> mean jack in relation to someone else getting X+ mpg with their car. > > Sure it does. If an 01 V6 automatic trans car gets 30, it's well within > his realm of believability that a 4 cylinder manual trans car gets 35 in > the same circumstances. > "realm of believability" ?? You serious? Either it *does* or it *doesn't*. Believability has nothing to do with it. But FWIW, I don't believe it. a |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Another Civic Loser bites it | Common Sense | Honda 2 | 0 | 27 Jun 2005 06:26 pm |
| Another Civic Loser bites it | jgrove24@hotmail.com | Honda 2 | 3 | 22 Jun 2005 01:06 am |
| red dust in the distributor cap??? | lamont1 | Honda 2 | 5 | 20 Oct 2004 02:52 pm |
| Ball Joint Dust Boot | Jingyuan | Honda 3 | 8 | 01 Sep 2004 03:00 pm |
| Dust Free Brake Pads??? | Jeff | Honda 3 | 4 | 25 Apr 2004 04:06 pm |