Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 29 Mar 2007, 08:38 pm
Allnews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default michelin harmony vs hydroedge

Realize this is a bit off topic, but want to buy long lasting tires (I put
lots of mileage) that are quiet too.
Placing them on my '05 Accord. Original Michelin were very quiet but
HORRIBLE in rain and I got very little mileage out of these.
Torn btw. harmony & hydroedge. Hydroedge reportedly has higher mileage but
more noise, especially as it wears...
Any recommendations?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 30 Mar 2007, 05:54 am
rjdriver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: michelin harmony vs hydroedge


"Allnews" <spamenot@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:_RZOh.17201$PV3.177377@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> Realize this is a bit off topic, but want to buy long lasting tires (I put
> lots of mileage) that are quiet too.
> Placing them on my '05 Accord. Original Michelin were very quiet but
> HORRIBLE in rain and I got very little mileage out of these.
> Torn btw. harmony & hydroedge. Hydroedge reportedly has higher mileage
> but more noise, especially as it wears...
> Any recommendations?
>


If 60000 miles is enough for you, look into the Bridgestone Turanza LS-H.
Don't expect great snow performance, but in all other wet dry conditions,
these are excellent. A bit pricey, so shop around.


Bob


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 30 Mar 2007, 09:22 am
kwatq
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: michelin harmony vs hydroedge

I have HydroEdge on my 2005 CR-V. They are great in the wet. I don't
notice any more noise, on the contrary compared to the original Bridgstone
crap.



On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:54:50 -0400, rjdriver wrote:


> "Allnews" <spamenot@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
> news:_RZOh.17201$PV3.177377@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>> Realize this is a bit off topic, but want to buy long lasting tires (I
>> put lots of mileage) that are quiet too.
>> Placing them on my '05 Accord. Original Michelin were very quiet but
>> HORRIBLE in rain and I got very little mileage out of these. Torn btw.
>> harmony & hydroedge. Hydroedge reportedly has higher mileage but more
>> noise, especially as it wears... Any recommendations?
>>
>>

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 30 Mar 2007, 12:57 pm
JeB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: michelin harmony vs hydroedge

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:38:02 GMT, "Allnews" <spamenot@nbnet.nb.ca>
wrote:

>Realize this is a bit off topic, but want to buy long lasting tires (I put
>lots of mileage) that are quiet too.
>Placing them on my '05 Accord. Original Michelin were very quiet but
>HORRIBLE in rain and I got very little mileage out of these.
>Torn btw. harmony & hydroedge. Hydroedge reportedly has higher mileage but
>more noise, especially as it wears...
>Any recommendations?
>


I've got Harmonys on a '94 Toyota Pickup. I don't think I'll drive
them down to the wear bars as I do some serious commuting. However
they will probably give me 65-70k miles. I've had no traction
problems with them and I drive them hard in the rain on occasion. As
far as noise, I know our Civic is bad for road noise so I don't what
if anything you can do about that. They aren't noisy on my truck.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 30 Mar 2007, 05:28 pm
Brian Smith
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: michelin harmony vs hydroedge


"Allnews" <spamenot@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:_RZOh.17201$PV3.177377@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> Realize this is a bit off topic, but want to buy long lasting tires (I put
> lots of mileage) that are quiet too.
> Placing them on my '05 Accord. Original Michelin were very quiet but
> HORRIBLE in rain and I got very little mileage out of these.
> Torn btw. harmony & hydroedge. Hydroedge reportedly has higher mileage
> but more noise, especially as it wears...
> Any recommendations?


I was wondering if the Hydroedge were a quiet tire myself. I had the
Harmony tires on my '01 Accord and I got 120,000 km on them before they were
down to the tread wear marks.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 30 Mar 2007, 07:33 pm
JXStern
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: michelin harmony vs hydroedge

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:38:02 GMT, "Allnews" <spamenot@nbnet.nb.ca>
wrote:

>Realize this is a bit off topic, but want to buy long lasting tires (I put
>lots of mileage) that are quiet too.
>Placing them on my '05 Accord. Original Michelin were very quiet but
>HORRIBLE in rain and I got very little mileage out of these.
>Torn btw. harmony & hydroedge. Hydroedge reportedly has higher mileage but
>more noise, especially as it wears...


Yah, drove my newish 2007 Accord EX in the rain for about the first
time the other day (it never rains in southern California), and
noticed the poor traction. Tires on previous Accord, most recently
2004, did much better, I think, and were still solid past 45k miles.

I know that's no help to you know, just concurring on the observation.
Must have changed something between 2004 and 2005.

J.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 31 Mar 2007, 12:33 am
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: michelin harmony vs hydroedge

Allnews wrote:
> Realize this is a bit off topic, but want to buy long lasting tires (I put
> lots of mileage) that are quiet too.
> Placing them on my '05 Accord. Original Michelin were very quiet but
> HORRIBLE in rain and I got very little mileage out of these.
> Torn btw. harmony & hydroedge. Hydroedge reportedly has higher mileage but
> more noise, especially as it wears...
> Any recommendations?
>
>

i found hydroedge to be a brutally harsh ride in a 2000 civic. great in
all other respects though.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 31 Mar 2007, 03:02 am
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: michelin harmony vs hydroedge

rjdriver wrote:
>
> If 60000 miles is enough for you, look into the Bridgestone Turanza LS-H.
> Don't expect great snow performance, but in all other wet dry conditions,
> these are excellent. A bit pricey, so shop around.


I have Turanza LS-T tires on my '88 Civic and I got 70,000 mi out of my last
set (I'm now on my 2nd set). They do fine in the rain but not in the snow.
For that I have a set of snow tires on an extra set of rims to swap over for
the 2 or 3 times a year I might need them.

Eric
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 31 Mar 2007, 10:15 am
ACAR
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: michelin harmony vs hydroedge

On Mar 29, 9:38 pm, "Allnews" <spame...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:
> Realize this is a bit off topic, but want to buy long lasting tires (I put
> lots of mileage) that are quiet too.
> Placing them on my '05 Accord. Original Michelin were very quiet but
> HORRIBLE in rain and I got very little mileage out of these.
> Torn btw. harmony & hydroedge. Hydroedge reportedly has higher mileage but
> more noise, especially as it wears...
> Any recommendations?


My suggestion is not to worry about the "long lasting" part but
concentrate on the performance aspects that are important to you. You
can use the Tire Rack's survey results for that type of analysis (be
sure to read the user comments as they often provide good information
on how the tires perform on different types of cars). My experience
with long lasting tires is that after several years their performance
begins to suffer in significant ways regardless of how much tread is
left. I'd have been better off buying higher performance tires with a
warranty of 40,000 to 60,000 miles than paying for the 70,000 to
80,000 mile warranty. In the overall cost of auto upkeep, tires are
really cheap - buy the best you can afford. Perhaps the Michelin Pilot
Exalto A/S or Bridgestone Potenza Pole Position or the Goodyear
Assurance TripleTred depending upon your driving style.

YMMV

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 31 Mar 2007, 10:49 am
Dave L
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: michelin harmony vs hydroedge


"ACAR" <getoutanpush@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1175354145.472322.293030@d57g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...
> On Mar 29, 9:38 pm, "Allnews" <spame...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:
>> Realize this is a bit off topic, but want to buy long lasting tires (I
>> put
>> lots of mileage) that are quiet too.
>> Placing them on my '05 Accord. Original Michelin were very quiet but
>> HORRIBLE in rain and I got very little mileage out of these.
>> Torn btw. harmony & hydroedge. Hydroedge reportedly has higher mileage
>> but
>> more noise, especially as it wears...
>> Any recommendations?

>
> My suggestion is not to worry about the "long lasting" part but
> concentrate on the performance aspects that are important to you. You
> can use the Tire Rack's survey results for that type of analysis (be
> sure to read the user comments as they often provide good information
> on how the tires perform on different types of cars). My experience
> with long lasting tires is that after several years their performance
> begins to suffer in significant ways regardless of how much tread is
> left. I'd have been better off buying higher performance tires with a
> warranty of 40,000 to 60,000 miles than paying for the 70,000 to
> 80,000 mile warranty. In the overall cost of auto upkeep, tires are
> really cheap - buy the best you can afford. Perhaps the Michelin Pilot
> Exalto A/S or Bridgestone Potenza Pole Position or the Goodyear
> Assurance TripleTred depending upon your driving style.
>
> YMMV



I was thinking the exact thing with the Michelin Pilot Exalto A/S, but
comparing them with the Bridgestone Potenza RE960. I've tried a couple sets
of the Potenza RE950s on my old car, and have never had a better tire in the
rain. Excellent, along with dry. Snow was not good, but worked in light
snow. I hear the RE960s which replaced them are better.

My '05 Accord LX has the OEM Michelin Energy, and agree - they have a LOT to
be desired.
Agree - www.tirerack.com - excellent source for reader surveys and test
track reviews.

-Dave


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Michelin Tires Sean D Honda 3 3 11 Oct 2005 05:22 pm
new tires for Civic; Micheline Hydroedge? chibitul Honda 2 12 12 Oct 2003 09:15 am
new tires for Civic; Micheline Hydroedge? chibitul Honda 3 12 12 Oct 2003 09:15 am
Bridgestone Dueler H/L vs Michelin Harmony on 2002 CR-V Drew D. Saur Honda 3 4 05 Aug 2003 04:48 pm
Michelin Tires for '99 TL? Gabriel Afana Acura 2 03 Jul 2003 11:43 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.