Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08 Jan 2007, 12:58 pm
xxx@xxx.xxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 84-87 Honda CRX mileage

I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the CRX that
got the great 60? mpg mileage in the middle 80s. Also a place to get mileage
info of other cars would be good too.

Reply to Redgreen202 at yahoo.
--
To reply, remove _
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09 Jan 2007, 09:09 am
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 84-87 Honda CRX mileage

xxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
>
> I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the CRX
> that got the great 60? mpg mileage in the middle 80s. Also a place to
> get mileage info of other cars would be good too.


The CRX HF which was available from '85-7 carbureted and '88-91 fuel
injected. However, I don't know the specific mpg associated with each
model. If it were my choice, I'd probably go with a '90 or '91.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11 Jan 2007, 08:12 am
xxx@xxx.xxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 84-87 Honda CRX mileage

On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:09:46 -0800, Eric <say.no@spam.now> wrote:

>xxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the CRX
>> that got the great 60? mpg mileage in the middle 80s. Also a place to
>> get mileage info of other cars would be good too.

>
>The CRX HF which was available from '85-7 carbureted and '88-91 fuel
>injected. However, I don't know the specific mpg associated with each
>model. If it were my choice, I'd probably go with a '90 or '91.
>
>Eric


Why those years?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11 Jan 2007, 07:46 pm
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 84-87 Honda CRX mileage

xxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
>
> On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:09:46 -0800, Eric <say.no@spam.now> wrote:
>
> >xxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
> >>
> >> I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the
> >> CRX that got the great 60? mpg mileage in the middle 80s. Also a
> >> place to get mileage info of other cars would be good too.

> >
> >The CRX HF which was available from '85-7 carbureted and '88-91 fuel
> >injected. However, I don't know the specific mpg associated with each
> >model. If it were my choice, I'd probably go with a '90 or '91.
> >

>
> Why those years?


I drive an '88 Civic 4 Dr. I prefer the fuel injected system to the
feedback carburetors on the '84-7 Civics. It seems more reliable and
easier to work on (I've done extensive work on both systems). I would
recommend the later years from the '88-91 series since Honda had a few
problems with the early years which were solved with design changes in
the later years. A few examples off the top of my head include the
distributor which was redesigned with better and more reliable pick-up
coils, the head lights which were redesigned with air vents so that they
don't accumulate condensation inside, the spot welds on the pedal clusters
of the early years also have a tendency to break apart, and the rear
suspension lower control arms which were redesigned to be solid steel
instead of pressed and formed sheet metal (however the latter point might be
argued by some folks since the solid arms have a large lower strut bushing
which tends to be problematic and the strut bushing is included with the
struts on the early years).

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12 Jan 2007, 06:03 am
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 84-87 Honda CRX mileage

Eric wrote:
>
> the spot welds on the pedal clusters of the early years also have a
> tendency to break apart


After rereading my post I realized that this statement was not clear. It
was intended to describe the '84-7 Civics and NOT the early years of the
'88-91 Civics which is implied in my earlier post.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12 Jan 2007, 08:47 am
xxx@xxx.xxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 84-87 Honda CRX mileage

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:46:38 -0800, Eric <say.no@spam.now> wrote:

>xxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:09:46 -0800, Eric <say.no@spam.now> wrote:
>>
>> >xxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the
>> >> CRX that got the great 60? mpg mileage in the middle 80s. Also a
>> >> place to get mileage info of other cars would be good too.
>> >
>> >The CRX HF which was available from '85-7 carbureted and '88-91 fuel
>> >injected. However, I don't know the specific mpg associated with each
>> >model. If it were my choice, I'd probably go with a '90 or '91.
>> >

>>
>> Why those years?

>
>I drive an '88 Civic 4 Dr. I prefer the fuel injected system to the
>feedback carburetors on the '84-7 Civics. It seems more reliable and
>easier to work on (I've done extensive work on both systems). I would
>recommend the later years from the '88-91 series since Honda had a few
>problems with the early years which were solved with design changes in
>the later years. A few examples off the top of my head include the
>distributor which was redesigned with better and more reliable pick-up
>coils, the head lights which were redesigned with air vents so that they
>don't accumulate condensation inside, the spot welds on the pedal clusters
>of the early years also have a tendency to break apart, and the rear
>suspension lower control arms which were redesigned to be solid steel
>instead of pressed and formed sheet metal (however the latter point might be
>argued by some folks since the solid arms have a large lower strut bushing
>which tends to be problematic and the strut bushing is included with the
>struts on the early years).
>
>Eric


But the mileage is better on the 84-87 than later years?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12 Jan 2007, 09:10 am
xxx@xxx.xxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 84-87 Honda CRX mileage

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:46:38 -0800, Eric <say.no@spam.now> wrote:

>xxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:09:46 -0800, Eric <say.no@spam.now> wrote:
>>
>> >xxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the
>> >> CRX that got the great 60? mpg mileage in the middle 80s. Also a
>> >> place to get mileage info of other cars would be good too.
>> >
>> >The CRX HF which was available from '85-7 carbureted and '88-91 fuel
>> >injected. However, I don't know the specific mpg associated with each
>> >model. If it were my choice, I'd probably go with a '90 or '91.
>> >

>>
>> Why those years?

>
>I drive an '88 Civic 4 Dr. I prefer the fuel injected system to the
>feedback carburetors on the '84-7 Civics. It seems more reliable and
>easier to work on (I've done extensive work on both systems). I would
>recommend the later years from the '88-91 series since Honda had a few
>problems with the early years which were solved with design changes in
>the later years. A few examples off the top of my head include the
>distributor which was redesigned with better and more reliable pick-up
>coils, the head lights which were redesigned with air vents so that they
>don't accumulate condensation inside, the spot welds on the pedal clusters
>of the early years also have a tendency to break apart, and the rear
>suspension lower control arms which were redesigned to be solid steel
>instead of pressed and formed sheet metal (however the latter point might be
>argued by some folks since the solid arms have a large lower strut bushing
>which tends to be problematic and the strut bushing is included with the
>struts on the early years).


Do they have fixes for those now?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12 Jan 2007, 02:56 pm
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 84-87 Honda CRX mileage

xxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
>
> Do they have fixes for those now?


I believe that my prior post clearly describes the fixes (though the control
arm bushing design still persists though most problems can be avoided by
using antiseize compound on the lower strut bolt, indeed I can't think of a
suspension bolt that shouldn't be reinstalled with antiseize).

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12 Jan 2007, 02:56 pm
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 84-87 Honda CRX mileage

xxx@xxx.xxx wrote:

> But the mileage is better on the 84-87 than later years?


As I stated in my first response, I don't know the specific mpg for each of
the model years. I can tell you that my '88 Civic DX 4 dr typically gets
between 37 and 41 mpg with about 2/3 or so of my driving being freeway
miles. This mileage is typical of what other people have reported on this
newsgroup for this model (for example, search at groups.google.com for
Elle's old posts). Given this information, I would imagine that the CRX
HF's mileage would be even higher since practically the whole car has been
lightened to obtain H_igh F_uel efficiency. There's a trade off though.
One of the most noticeable to me when driving these cars is that the level
of road noise is much higher than other Civics due to there being less noise
insulation. However, if you're one of those people who always drive around
with the stereo on 11 than that might not matter much.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12 Jan 2007, 07:53 pm
Flatlander47
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 84-87 Honda CRX mileage

Eric <say.no@spam.now> wrote:

>>xxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
>>
>>> But the mileage is better on the 84-87 than later years?

>>
>>As I stated in my first response, I don't know the specific mpg for each of
>>the model years. I can tell you that my '88 Civic DX 4 dr typically gets
>>between 37 and 41 mpg with about 2/3 or so of my driving being freeway
>>miles. This mileage is typical of what other people have reported on this
>>newsgroup for this model (for example, search at groups.google.com for
>>Elle's old posts). Given this information, I would imagine that the CRX
>>HF's mileage would be even higher since practically the whole car has been
>>lightened to obtain H_igh F_uel efficiency. There's a trade off though.
>>One of the most noticeable to me when driving these cars is that the level
>>of road noise is much higher than other Civics due to there being less noise
>>insulation. However, if you're one of those people who always drive around
>>with the stereo on 11 than that might not matter much.
>>
>>Eric


We have an '87 CRX. If you live anywhere that it gets cold, I wouldn't buy
one of those on a bet due to the fact that it's carbureted. Get one of the
fuel injected models. I haven't kept mileage numbers lately. I'd guess
it's getting in the low to mid-30s around town. It's been very reliable
with 144K on it now and no major maintenance.

We have the standard CRX in which performance is marginal. I would guess
the HF is really underpowered.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Honda Fit Mileage? lymecheck@hotmail.com Honda 2 22 08 Aug 2007 07:43 am
84-87 Honda CRX mileage xxx@xxx.xxx Honda 3 9 07 Feb 2007 04:43 pm
84-87 Honda CRX mileage xxx@xxx.xxx Honda 1 0 08 Jan 2007 12:59 pm
Honda Mileage Peter H Honda 2 13 27 Jan 2004 09:04 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers




Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 © 2011, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.