Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 27 Nov 2006, 10:35 am
Walbert
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 1993 Civic LX Needs new engine?

My harmonic balancer went out last week on my '93 civic, and tore up
the end of my crankshaft rather wickedly. The car has 170,000 miles on
it. Nothing has been serviced outside of Honda's standard
replacements, and the aging motor generally just sounds worn and tired,
the head gasket has a small leak, and it seems like it's time to either
change the motor or get rid of the car.

A friend of my roommate has a 2001 civic, which he swapped the d17a2
motor out of sometime around 40,000 miles in order to make room for a
more powerful k20, and is offering it to me at a very reasonable price,
with the ecu.

Has anyone here ever done/heard of this kind of swap?

Is it possible? Is it stupid?

Mainly, if I have this swap done professionally, would the extra labor
required make it worth it to just buy a (much more expensive than the
d17, to me) new d15 and have that swapped in? How many extra man hours
am I looking at, roughly?

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 27 Nov 2006, 11:02 am
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1993 Civic LX Needs new engine?

Walbert wrote:
> My harmonic balancer went out last week on my '93 civic, and tore up
> the end of my crankshaft rather wickedly.


this motor doesn't have an harmonic balancer, just a steel pulley wheel.

> The car has 170,000 miles on
> it.


for a honda, that's maybe half way there. should still be running fine.

> Nothing has been serviced outside of Honda's standard
> replacements,


if the pulley wheel broke loose, the crank nut was not fastened
correctly or it was stripped last time the timing belt was changed.
either way, it's a maintenance error.

> and the aging motor generally just sounds worn and tired,
> the head gasket has a small leak, and it seems like it's time to either
> change the motor or get rid of the car.


whatever the reason, if the crank is damaged, the motor is uneconomic to
repair. buy a used low mileage replacement from japan - there's loads
of companies on the net that import them.

>
> A friend of my roommate has a 2001 civic, which he swapped the d17a2
> motor out of sometime around 40,000 miles in order to make room for a
> more powerful k20, and is offering it to me at a very reasonable price,
> with the ecu.


it's not a plug-n-play replacement. the ecu is obdII and the vehicle
needs extensive re-wiring for instruments, data port, two oxygen
sensors, etc.

>
> Has anyone here ever done/heard of this kind of swap?
>
> Is it possible?


it's possible - the question is, how quickly do you want it running and
at what expense? if you're paying someone else, the labor necessary to
re-wire will negate any saving on buying the motor "cheap" - and the
motor is not that great in the first place. if you want to upgrade, buy
a b16, b18, etc. the upgrade path is well documented and parts are
readily accessible. otherwise, the cheap easy solution is to buy a jdm
replacement for your existing motor and do a straight swap, no mods.

> Is it stupid?
>
> Mainly, if I have this swap done professionally, would the extra labor
> required make it worth it to just buy a (much more expensive than the
> d17, to me) new d15 and have that swapped in? How many extra man hours
> am I looking at, roughly?
>


look into having the labor done by whoever last did your timing belt.
it's their screw up.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 27 Nov 2006, 03:27 pm
Walbert
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1993 Civic LX Needs new engine?


jim beam wrote:
> Walbert wrote:
> > My harmonic balancer went out last week on my '93 civic, and tore up
> > the end of my crankshaft rather wickedly.

>
> this motor doesn't have an harmonic balancer, just a steel pulley wheel.
>
> > The car has 170,000 miles on
> > it.

>
> for a honda, that's maybe half way there. should still be running fine.
>
> > Nothing has been serviced outside of Honda's standard
> > replacements,

>
> if the pulley wheel broke loose, the crank nut was not fastened
> correctly or it was stripped last time the timing belt was changed.
> either way, it's a maintenance error.


The crank nut was still attached firmly and in tact (not stripped) when
the remains of the old pulley were removed. The pulley split in half
around the rubber dampener (excuse my lack of proper terminology),
though it looks as if it made at least a partial rotation around the
crank (the crank is very gouged and the little key piece that inserts
between the pulley and crank was nowhere to be found) before the rubber
section separated. The power steering pump was also seized up, which
I'm lead to believe is the cause of all of this.

With this extra information, would maintenance error still appear to
play a part? It wasn't something I had been suspecting as of yet.

> > and the aging motor generally just sounds worn and tired,
> > the head gasket has a small leak, and it seems like it's time to either
> > change the motor or get rid of the car.

>
> whatever the reason, if the crank is damaged, the motor is uneconomic to
> repair. buy a used low mileage replacement from japan - there's loads
> of companies on the net that import them.
>
> >
> > A friend of my roommate has a 2001 civic, which he swapped the d17a2
> > motor out of sometime around 40,000 miles in order to make room for a
> > more powerful k20, and is offering it to me at a very reasonable price,
> > with the ecu.

>
> it's not a plug-n-play replacement. the ecu is obdII and the vehicle
> needs extensive re-wiring for instruments, data port, two oxygen
> sensors, etc.
>


A friend pointed me to http://www.boomslang.us/, assuring me that I
could install the d17's ECU and use one of their harnesses to attach my
existing sensors, with no more than a few sensors needing to be changed
or added. The person offering me the motor told me mainly to 'pay
close attention to the crank position sensor'. Is this just completely
not the case, and I'm landing myself in a wiring nightmare?

> >
> > Has anyone here ever done/heard of this kind of swap?
> >
> > Is it possible?

>
> it's possible - the question is, how quickly do you want it running and
> at what expense?


I'd like it running before christmas, ideally at the cost of less than
$1000 + cost of motor, doing as much labor as possible by myself, which
would probably entail most, if not all of the ECU replacement/sensor
work.

if you're paying someone else, the labor necessary to
> re-wire will negate any saving on buying the motor "cheap" - and the
> motor is not that great in the first place.


By saying the motor is 'not that great', do you mean that it isn't
going to respond well to a turbocharger and 15 pounds of boost, or
that, even if well maintained, it's longevity would be less that an
equivalent b-series motor? I've only owned this car for the last ten
thousand miles or so, and it being my first Honda, I'm still
familiarizing myself with the brand.

> if you want to upgrade, buy
> a b16, b18, etc. the upgrade path is well documented and parts are


Is the upgrade path I'm talking about documented at all, because
(according to my best googling) I'm beginning to think not.

> readily accessible. otherwise, the cheap easy solution is to buy a jdm
> replacement for your existing motor and do a straight swap, no mods.
>


I'm not really looking for any extra performance... just a car that
will last, and am fine with doing any labor that I have the
tools/ability to complete. (I'm a computer programmer by trade, and am
not much of a stranger to electral/wiring work)

> > Is it stupid?
> >
> > Mainly, if I have this swap done professionally, would the extra labor
> > required make it worth it to just buy a (much more expensive than the
> > d17, to me) new d15 and have that swapped in? How many extra man hours
> > am I looking at, roughly?
> >

>
> look into having the labor done by whoever last did your timing belt.
> it's their screw up.


Would be something only the last owner would know about, though he did
mention having the water pump very recently replaced when I bought it.

Thanks, Jim. I appreciate your feedback a lot. Every other honda
enthusiast I've mentioned this two said something along the lines of
"they're both D series... the d17 is a little bit of an oddball, but
you shouldn't really have too much trouble getting things working".
The negative sides are what I'm really looking to hear.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 27 Nov 2006, 10:40 pm
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1993 Civic LX Needs new engine?

Walbert wrote:
> jim beam wrote:
>> Walbert wrote:
>>> My harmonic balancer went out last week on my '93 civic, and tore up
>>> the end of my crankshaft rather wickedly.

>> this motor doesn't have an harmonic balancer, just a steel pulley wheel.
>>
>>> The car has 170,000 miles on
>>> it.

>> for a honda, that's maybe half way there. should still be running fine.
>>
>>> Nothing has been serviced outside of Honda's standard
>>> replacements,

>> if the pulley wheel broke loose, the crank nut was not fastened
>> correctly or it was stripped last time the timing belt was changed.
>> either way, it's a maintenance error.

>
> The crank nut was still attached firmly and in tact (not stripped) when
> the remains of the old pulley were removed. The pulley split in half
> around the rubber dampener (excuse my lack of proper terminology),
> though it looks as if it made at least a partial rotation around the
> crank (the crank is very gouged and the little key piece that inserts
> between the pulley and crank was nowhere to be found) before the rubber
> section separated. The power steering pump was also seized up, which
> I'm lead to believe is the cause of all of this.
>
> With this extra information, would maintenance error still appear to
> play a part? It wasn't something I had been suspecting as of yet.
>
>>> and the aging motor generally just sounds worn and tired,
>>> the head gasket has a small leak, and it seems like it's time to either
>>> change the motor or get rid of the car.

>> whatever the reason, if the crank is damaged, the motor is uneconomic to
>> repair. buy a used low mileage replacement from japan - there's loads
>> of companies on the net that import them.
>>
>>> A friend of my roommate has a 2001 civic, which he swapped the d17a2
>>> motor out of sometime around 40,000 miles in order to make room for a
>>> more powerful k20, and is offering it to me at a very reasonable price,
>>> with the ecu.

>> it's not a plug-n-play replacement. the ecu is obdII and the vehicle
>> needs extensive re-wiring for instruments, data port, two oxygen
>> sensors, etc.
>>

>
> A friend pointed me to http://www.boomslang.us/, assuring me that I
> could install the d17's ECU and use one of their harnesses to attach my
> existing sensors, with no more than a few sensors needing to be changed
> or added. The person offering me the motor told me mainly to 'pay
> close attention to the crank position sensor'. Is this just completely
> not the case, and I'm landing myself in a wiring nightmare?
>
>>> Has anyone here ever done/heard of this kind of swap?
>>>
>>> Is it possible?

>> it's possible - the question is, how quickly do you want it running and
>> at what expense?

>
> I'd like it running before christmas, ideally at the cost of less than
> $1000 + cost of motor, doing as much labor as possible by myself, which
> would probably entail most, if not all of the ECU replacement/sensor
> work.
>
> if you're paying someone else, the labor necessary to
>> re-wire will negate any saving on buying the motor "cheap" - and the
>> motor is not that great in the first place.

>
> By saying the motor is 'not that great', do you mean that it isn't
> going to respond well to a turbocharger and 15 pounds of boost, or
> that, even if well maintained, it's longevity would be less that an
> equivalent b-series motor? I've only owned this car for the last ten
> thousand miles or so, and it being my first Honda, I'm still
> familiarizing myself with the brand.
>
>> if you want to upgrade, buy
>> a b16, b18, etc. the upgrade path is well documented and parts are

>
> Is the upgrade path I'm talking about documented at all, because
> (according to my best googling) I'm beginning to think not.
>
>> readily accessible. otherwise, the cheap easy solution is to buy a jdm
>> replacement for your existing motor and do a straight swap, no mods.
>>

>
> I'm not really looking for any extra performance... just a car that
> will last, and am fine with doing any labor that I have the
> tools/ability to complete. (I'm a computer programmer by trade, and am
> not much of a stranger to electral/wiring work)
>
>>> Is it stupid?
>>>
>>> Mainly, if I have this swap done professionally, would the extra labor
>>> required make it worth it to just buy a (much more expensive than the
>>> d17, to me) new d15 and have that swapped in? How many extra man hours
>>> am I looking at, roughly?
>>>

>> look into having the labor done by whoever last did your timing belt.
>> it's their screw up.

>
> Would be something only the last owner would know about, though he did
> mention having the water pump very recently replaced when I bought it.
>
> Thanks, Jim. I appreciate your feedback a lot. Every other honda
> enthusiast I've mentioned this two said something along the lines of
> "they're both D series... the d17 is a little bit of an oddball, but
> you shouldn't really have too much trouble getting things working".
> The negative sides are what I'm really looking to hear.
>

ok, you sound like you've done a little homework and are not afraid of
what to do - that's good. but if this were my vehicle, and unless this
new motor was almost free, or i wanted the science project, i'd go down
the j.d.m. road instead. that way:

1. i know it's going to work.
2. there's guaranteed no issues on smog.
3. other than the motor, there's no extra parts to buy.
4. it's cheap - $300-$500.

science projects are great, but they're not for your daily driver.
google for 'jdm import honda motor' and you'll be swamped with options!

and don't install the d17 expecting better performance. i know there's
weight differences, but my stock '89 with a dpfi odb0 d15 /spanks/ my
2000 civic with d16 obdII mpfi, especially on the top end - even though
the d17 is supposedly rated with much more output. if you want
performance, again, go for the b-series or even the d16z6.

one more little thing - not that it would ever bother a law abiding
citizen - is that obdII ecu's store driver data like speed, braking and
driver throttle pedal position info. think what that could mean...

regarding the breakage, maybe it was the steering pump, but i'd have
thought it would just break the belt, not the pulley. describing a
rubber insert does indeed sound like an harmonic balancer, but i've
never seen one on a honda. similarly, it's hard to see how the woodruff
key could be missing - it's captive inside the pulley wheel. most
bizarre. you could post links to photos of the damage to pinypic.com
if you want more comment.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1993 Accord SE Sedan (auto)..does the engine use a type of engineoil cooler ? phil Honda 2 0 19 Dec 2005 06:04 pm
1993 Civic geerbo@webtv.net Honda 2 1 02 Jan 2005 07:28 am
E.C.U Flash codes Rover 216 (1993) Honda engine Gary Honda 2 3 03 Aug 2003 03:37 am
Need advice for Civic 1993 engine swap Ye Myint Honda 3 0 18 Jul 2003 10:39 pm
Re: 1993 Accord front/rear engine seals (resolution) Dan Birchall Honda 3 1 16 Jul 2003 09:04 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.